Our overall test execution time for every release was very high, since we shifted to remote working. We had to find a solution that would help us radically reduce our test execution time and help us with faster deployments. Moreover our UI had multiple API dependencies which prompted us to leverage browser automation testing. By running tests in parallel on the lambdatest platform we reduced our testing time from 50 minutes to 10 minutes. This really helped the team in getting faster feedback, in a better way using LambdaTest integrations and put more focus on code quality.

LambdaTest solved our core challenge of reducing the test execution time further improving the feedback loop significantly. The ability to run tests in parallel on a cloud infrastructure is smooth. We could quickly and continuously execute hundreds of tests in our builds with the help of Circle CI LambdaTest integration. UI is very intuitive , features like test analytics, custom tags makes the job for my team easy to filter out tests results for the team.

There were a few stability issues while using simulators and we expressed the concern to the support team. Would be great to replace simulators with real devices for better efficiency.

Overall Good Experience

Real Time device available.Easy to find the device along with the latest versionBug Capturing

Sometimes it don't support the heavy page load. Loading issue problem. Slow work

I can test the application in any mobile device using it is a very good testing tool, but it has some flaws. For eg :- UI changes are not visible, very slow and ect..ectbut overall tool is very good but need to improve some quality's

interface, screen recording functionality

screen shot, home page button

1. A great collection of real devices 2. Easy to use and navigate

Pricing can be more flexible for low usage.

10/10 is the minimum, at least on our use-case. The UI/UX is surprisingly better and the "boot" time to the VM and browser is a lot faster than BrowserStack.Not that BrowserStack isn't a good product. It is. But Lambdatest take it to another level.

The price-performance ratio. For about 50% of similar plan on BrowserStack, I get an astonishing fast and complete experience.

No cons. I wish I had discovered Lambdatest sooner.

Their customer service is very good and their pricing is reasonable for all that they offer.

We don't need to maintain our own grid for every conceivable OS and browser version. LambdaTest does all of that for you.

We have found some issues related to webdrivers and we have to use custom translations for Firefox and Safari browser and we are still unable to successfully run all of our tests on Safari browser.

Neutral

I like the variety of devices provided on lambda test and Location options.

It does not show real ip and give organic testing

LambaTest allowed us to perform testing on OS/Browser combinations that we do not possess and that would be otherwise be costly to obtain. It allowed us to ship a better product with little additional effort.

The ease with which you can test on wildly different environments, and the amount of possible environments combinations are great. This get you covered for your whole user base

Sometimes the speed of environment deploying is not great, though it is a rather minor issue.

I used to test my final landing pages, I don't have an iPhone with me then I have to test using LambdaTest, I really liked how quickly I can test my website, without any problem.

I think you can have some special prices for only mobile tests or something like that because I really don't need to use the another resources, only the iOS Browser website test and the website picture take.

I love it, I need to explore more on local testing with this.

Is a great alternative to BS, it is a great tool for web testing

I have spent a lot of time with it, so I don't have cons at the moment.

Overall, I would highly recommend Lambdatest to anyone in need of a reliable, easy-to-use cross-browser testing platform. The platform's extensive range of features and its ability to seamlessly integrate with existing business processes make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their testing process and ensure the highest level of quality

Lambdatest is an excellent cross-browser testing platform that I have been using for a while now. The platform has a range of features that have been incredibly impactful for my testing needs. One of the most impactful features for me is the ability to test my web applications across a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and devices, all from a single platform. This has been incredibly helpful in ensuring that my web applications are functional and accessible for all users, regardless of their device or browser preferences

One potential downside of the platform is that it can be somewhat pricey, especially for smaller businesses or individual users who only need to test a limited number of web applications. The platform offers a range of pricing plans based on the number of concurrent sessions and the length of the subscription, but these plans can be quite expensive compared to some of the platform's competitors.

Our team uses LambdaTest to develop websites, software or other digital applications as part of the software testing process. One of the most important features is automated screenshot testing that helped us to identify browser compatibility issues of our websites by capturing instant automated screenshots across multiple real browsers and OS combinations. This is extremely helpful when you discover a design flaw in a particular browser and notify the developer. We could also capture the automated screenshots that are behind the login authentication. Besides, the bonus tool automated screenshot scheduler helped save our time to capture screenshots at regular intervals without logging into LambdaTest.

Parallel Testing with selenium and cypress both. Automated screenshots and sharing across integrations. Complimentary LT Browser access. Test responsive design for both major mobile and desktop platforms. Smart testing to identify visual regression bugs by offering pixel-to-pixel comparison.

Real device support is not there for mobile website testing. No native app testing support.

it was a 9/10

ease of understanding, easy to use for beginners

support is not that good, still not that important of an issue

Lambdatest is one of those tools that just works. I don't need it all the time but when I do, it's invaluable to have.

It's easy to use and spin up test environments when users report bugs. The automated testing and screenshot features are also huge timesavers.

There's nothing to list. It just works.

Being able to test on multiple browsers all in one place makes my job easier, and their customer service is always fast to respond and super helpful.

Real-time testing is available on the free version, and the paid version allows for multiple paralyzations. They offer automation testing on the paid version.

There were specific tests that I ran on Safari that passed but didn't pass on an actual device which makes me a little bit skeptical about their simulators; however, that was only about 10% of the time, which is to be expected with most simulators out there.

We were able to very easily move our TestCafe automation from CrossBrowserTesting to LambdaTest which was a big benefit as we did not have to take a large amount of time to make the transition and keep us away from more important product work. So far, LambdaTest has been very reliable and has no required much babysitting which is very much appreciated.

LambdaTest enables us to run automated test suites against all the browsers our users use in a reliable and fast manner.

The manual testing option sometimes allows me to choose browsers and versions that do not actually work so I have to try and find one that does. This is especially true when working with older browsers.

It has a lot of browsers and real devices, is easy to use the tunnel

The dev tools are really slow and it gets tricky to click

Lambda Test saves your testing time and easy to test across multiple platforms simultaneously based on UI and alignment etc.

You can test multiple platforms like Apple, Windows, Tabs, Mobile browsers, etc same time for your website, and you can also include your favorite ones in a setup and test from that. Some feature requests that we asked from Lambda Test also, they implemented, like Jira integration feature with some additional inputs.

Some browsers render different, for e.g. some mobiles, compared to real devices. But that was minimal & rare i guess.

I liked it because it has helped me report and fix many existing UI issues and has helped in automation.

The most important feature I like about Lambdatest is that it is very user-friendly due to its good UI, plus it provides all the latest devices to use even updating its browser versions. It even gives inspect type function to check the functionality in different devices which is useful for me.

It doesn't provide types of laptop devices which is not good, it should provide as it provides various mobile devices rest of the functions are good.

Lambda Test is one of the market leading cross browser testing tool, can start immediately with a free account. The automation process is very strong, specially with Selenium grid. LambdaTest plugins and Integration facility is extremely impressive, can integrate with different types of tools like project management, CI/CD, codeless automation, team communication, test management, etc. I’m using this tool for our developed web application’s cross browser testing. Though I’m using the free version but I’m completely satisfied with this tool and I just impressed with their infrastructure, love it.

i) Fully automated and live interactive. ii) The interface is very smart and easy to understand. Iii) Vast collection of browser and mobile devices for real time testing. iv) Have facility to take scheduled screenshot. v) Supported different programming languages for running automation script. vi) Can distribute the account among the team members for simultaneous testing.

i) Sometimes the application loading slowly, need very strong internet connection to explore the tool. Ii) The price of web automation monthly plan is quite high.

Various devices available for app testing and multi browsers available for website testing in real time

Some times the support is not on time and small laptops are also not available for real device testing

Our customers started reporting that our websites stuck in lower verisons of IE and Firefox. So we thought to get it tested and yes they stuck!. Thanks to LambdaTest with its enrich features we were able to build a compatible website.

We have used many cross browser testing tools but we stuck with LambdaTest from the very first use. We are a startup and it's very hard for us to go for costly plans in the market but thanks to LambdaTest and its startup program. It is so nice of them to provide discounts for startups along with all the features. Long way to go LambdaTest.

There's nothing to dislike. I really love the product.

Overall, it's been great!

As a website PM who often is involved with site QA testing, I am incredibly glad to have the ability to instantly switch between virtually any browser, device, OS, etc of note in order to test my site. Simply put, I just wouldn't have the resources to do that very well if I didn't use Lambda Test.

On rare occasions LT could be a bit slow to load the test environments (~15 seconds), which could be a problem when hundreds of browser/device/OS combos need to be tested quickly.

Using LambdaTest automation we could run all our functionality tests suits across multiple browsers and OS. Helped us identify UI misalignment specific to browsers or functionality failure due to incompatibility with a particular browser. The good part is you can automate screenshots and get insights into where and which browser your website’s UI is going off. Then we can use the live feature to identify and debug the compatibility issue. We strongly believe customer experience is the key and that could impede your product growth. With lambdatest, we could see improvements in identifying errors before our customer does.

Offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation which is amazing! You can select browsers, os, country and start testing instantly. As said we perform multiple tests for browsers coverage, so we have scaled up our testing pipeline and are now running multiple tests in parallel. This scaling up was way too easy. No more adding VMs for testing locally.Further, offers integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our cycle easier.

Mobile application testing would be helpful for us.We have been asking the support team for this feature but it's yet to be implemented. Would also like to see more devices for screenshot testing.