Home

/

Continuous Integration Software

/

Travis CI

Software Advice offers objective insights based on verified user reviews and independent product and market research. When our advisors match you to a software provider, we may earn a referral fee.

Travis CI 2026: Benefits, Features & Pricing

On this page
  • Overview
  • Pricing and Plans
  • Features
  • Integrations
  • User Reviews

Overview

Travis CI
Travis CI
4.1
(129)

Pricing

Starting at $69.00 per month

About Travis CI

Travis CI is a cloud-based continuous integration platform designed to help developers test projects and update production or staging as the tests pass. Key features include authentication, change management, role-based permissions, data synchronization, continuous deployment, custom development and testing management.

Teams using Travis CI can push their codes to the cloud platform and gain greater control over security by integrating the system with Github.com. The solution uses OAuth for authentication, which enables managers to sync user permissions to ensure team members only have access to the necessary repositories. Supervisors can use SAML and LDAP to manage user access. The platform utilizes a 'clean room', which lets businesses, where each build is run in a clean, new consistent environment.

Travis CI Screenshots

0
0
1
2

Travis CI Pricing and Plans

Starting price: $69.00 per month
Free Trial
Free Version

Basic

$69.00

per feature, per month

No plan information available

    Travis CI Features

    • Popular features found in Continuous Integration
      Automated Testing
      Continuous Delivery
      Continuous Deployment
      Debugging
    • More features of Travis CI
      Access Controls/Permissions
      API
      Approval Workflow
      Authentication
      Build Log
      Change Management
      Collaboration Tools
      Configuration Management
      Continuous Integration
      Dashboard
      Data Synchronization
      KPI Monitoring
      Projections
      Quality Assurance
      Release Management
      Reporting/Analytics
      Role-Based Permissions
      Testing Management
      Version Control

    Travis CI Integrations

    Project Monitor
    Project Monitor
    User.com
    User.com
    GitHub
    GitHub

    Travis CI User Reviews

    Overall Rating

    4.1

    Ratings Breakdown

    5

    47%

    4

    29%

    3

    17%

    2

    2%

    1

    5%

    Secondary Ratings

    Ease of Use

    3.9

    Value for money

    3.9

    Customer support

    3.3

    Functionality

    4.2

    Ian's profile

    Ian M.

    Verified reviewer

    Internet

    2-10 employees

    Used monthly for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed February 2020

    CI tool that has a lot of value for the money

    5

    I started using Travis initially because I needed a way to have consistent builds of our desktop software (built on Electron). Travis has just the tools I needed to make this happen. Doing local builds of the software was processor intensive, I had to go check the status of the build and I was always changing software on my local machine so sometimes builds would fail because I changed something. Travis has completely containerized build machines so you get the same result every time. We now use it for building all our software. I don't know what we'd do without it.

    Ratings Breakdown

    4
    Ease of use
    5
    Value for money
    5
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    * Affordable (it's priced based on users/seats) * Documentation is solid and easy to follow. I've never needed to contact support. There's good online Q&A since Travis has a large user base. * Versatile (whatever software you're building, there's a recipe for it) * Github integration : you get realtime build status RIGHT in Github which is awesome, once you get your system set up, you rarely ever visit Travis again. It just works.
    Cons:
    There's really nothing I didn't like about Travis. Some of the quirks of Electron were the trickiest things to figure out, but that's not Travis's fault. There's a little learning curve when you go from building locally to building remotely with Travis where you need to understand how to set environment variables and retrieve those values in your config/script.

    Reasons for choosing Travis CI

    We didn't look at other options. Circle CI would have been the likely comparison but I don't think at the time we made the selection there was much online about Circle CI supporting Electron builds. It may have been possible, but the Electron community was definitely more affiliated with Travis CI. We knew we wanted something hosted, so we didn't look at Jenkins (which, I think, requires you to host and manage it yourself).

    Read More

    NC

    Nicholas C.

    Verified reviewer

    Education Management

    Self-Employed

    Used daily for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed February 2021

    Easy-to-use product but support for OSS failing

    5

    Ratings Breakdown

    3
    Ease of use
    3
    Value for money
    1
    Customer support
    5
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    I like how easy it is to deploy and get up and running with this software and configuration files, etc (e.g. it's essentially just a commandline which is nice). It was also really nice for all of my open-source projects while travis-ci.org was still running. I could deploy and have builds run without having to worry about money.
    Cons:
    Ever since the move to travis-ci.com, support has been terrible and I've used up all of my free trial credits on my open-source web application's Cypress integration tests (https://github.com/tutorbookapp/tutorbook). I contacted support 5 days ago and still haven't heard back about getting more open-source credits for my account. I seriously miss travis-ci.org (though I completely understand the problems with cryptocurrency mining, etc).

    Reasons for switching to Travis CI

    I had used TravisCI earlier for building and deployments so I already knew how to use it. I decided to switch back to using TravisCI because CircleCI's configuration just took waaaaay too long to learn and implement correctly.

    Read More

    NP

    Nicolas P.

    Verified reviewer

    Internet

    2-10 employees

    Used daily for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed June 2021

    Loved Travis in the past, sad to be on my way out.

    3

    Between the cons described above, the service degradation I've observed in the past 6 months and your recent organizational and pricing changes (we are an open-source project and directly impacted), I'll be setting up Github actions to run my CI tests from here onwards (this is also about standardizing with other projects in my organization) and will deactivate my travis account.

    Ratings Breakdown

    1
    Ease of use
    4
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    It worked really nicely until about 6 months ago ! The previous unlimited open-source plan was generous, and a huge selling point.
    Cons:
    Service has been less than ideal since the decision to move OSS projects travis-ci.org. We have felt this throttling of resources, and it was an indication that things were about tho change for the worse. I was surprised to find that from one day to the next my CI builds weren't being run anymore. Sure enough, you had a banner announcing the change from travis-ci.org to .com , but I didn't understand it would require changes on my side, and I didn't receive an email letting me know that my CI builds would just stop if I didn't manage it. I'll admit my fault in not checking more thoroughly. Moving from .org to .com was not as easy as I would have liked (Why do I need to sign up for a beta? Why is it in beta, and why do you need more decisions from me that I don't have all the information to decide?), but I eventually got there.

    Read More

    ES

    EMANUELE S.

    Verified reviewer

    Information Technology and Services

    2-10 employees

    Used daily for less than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed February 2021

    CI / CD in a simple way

    5

    I'm very happy about Travis, until now I found always an answer for each need I had

    Ratings Breakdown

    4
    Ease of use
    4
    Value for money
    5
    Customer support
    5
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    1. Documentation, maybe the most important value 2. Configuration flexibility in particular GIT SSH custom keys, env variables with sensitive information, build trigger (with inline configuration... very useful for testing configurations), machine SSH encrypted keys, configuration imports, custom scripts 3. Easy integration with GitHub
    Cons:
    Permissions check (it's not so clear understand who can build, who can view build history, who can edit configuration).

    Reasons for choosing Travis CI

    I already knew TeamCity but there wasn't a cloud version when I choosed Travis. Ionic has a ready to use mobile app configuration and we use it. I never had enough time to setup a Travis configuration build successfully a ionic app.

    Read More

    GR

    Griffith R.

    Verified reviewer

    Research

    5001-10000 employees

    Used monthly for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed March 2021

    Largely self-taught, test driven developer

    4

    It's the core, it's the standard, and it does work fairly well. I'm kind of surprised it isn't as straightforwardly automatic to sort from GitHub, and there are some confusing elements to enabling it (and I don't quite understand why it's not more integrated with GitHub actions but maybe I'm wrong on that) but it's the standard, and automating test suits is crucial to good, maintainable code (especially if maintained by a community).

    Ratings Breakdown

    4
    Ease of use
    5
    Value for money
    3
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    It's free if your code is open source and lots of other services (like zenodo, netlify etc.) already sort out interoperability, usually a bit sooner than gitlab.
    Cons:
    It might be a lot quicker/better maintained for non-free use, but the options for testing packages in R, for example, are kind of weak and very slow (assuming the examples I've come across are standard). The fact that they only include python2 by default, plus some permission issues means packages using reticulate (for python/R interoperability) have a bit of a pain to get going (and it takes a long time to test). I guess if default options could be better maintained that would be much appreciated.

    Reasons for choosing Travis CI

    I didn't choose it, my employer did and to work with colleagues this was the only real option.

    Read More

    JD

    Jiří D.

    Verified reviewer

    Computer Software

    10000+ employees

    Used daily for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed July 2021

    My OpenSource projects got accustomed to free CI; Travis is no longer that

    4

    I feel disappointed by the pricing change

    Ratings Breakdown

    3
    Ease of use
    2
    Value for money
    3
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    Established service; Easy to configure; Supports macOS and AArch64 Linux
    Cons:
    Pricing structure for free and Open Source projects

    Reasons for choosing Travis CI

    It was one of the first services of this kind that was available. Afterwards, I never had a sufficient reason to make a switch.

    Read More

    TW

    Thomas W.

    Verified reviewer

    Food & Beverages

    Self-Employed

    Used daily for less than 6 months

    Review source

    Reviewed February 2021

    Great product - Pricing is insane for someone on a single team

    5

    Good experience - got hooked on the free trial, but it's time to move on as its costing an arm & a leg.

    Ratings Breakdown

    5
    Ease of use
    2
    Value for money
    5
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    I really like Travis CI, creating .travis.yml files is easy enough & I love the interface for seeing my build progress. That said I'll be moving off of this platform very shortly.
    Cons:
    The cost is insane - Azure DevOps offers pipelines for free, my AWS sites (5 of them) cost less to host than my Travis CI subscription, AWS has a DevOps implementation that is about $15/mo - even if Travis CI was at $20-$25/mo I would consider it as a solution.

    Reasons for choosing Travis CI

    I was working through a tutorial on AWS & this was offered as the CI / CD solution, since the trial was free I opted for it. Now that my project is in production though this pricing is my highest cost service & needs to be addressed.

    Read More

    Elliott's profile

    Elliott L.

    Verified reviewer

    Computer Software

    11-50 employees

    Used daily for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed July 2019

    Really simple to use continuous integration.

    5

    Ratings Breakdown

    5
    Ease of use
    5
    Value for money
    5
    Customer support
    5
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    We use it to run php unit tests whenever we commit code to a repository. All we have to do is include a file in the root of the project and enable the project in the travis interface. Takes less than 5 minutes to set up fully automated unit testing. Much more easy than setting up your own CI pipeline with the huge amount of different apps that exists. Generous free tier.
    Cons:
    Can be slow at times, documentation can on occasion be more minimal than I would like. As a developer you get used to this though, there are always loads of examples online.

    Reasons for choosing Travis CI

    Travis works on all major providers.

    Read More

    Ondřej's profile

    Ondřej P.

    Verified reviewer

    Computer Software

    51-200 employees

    Used daily for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed February 2021

    Past Glory

    1

    We started using Travis in September 2016. Over the years we used it for both CI and CD pipelines for most of our applications - we had about 300 pipelines. For many years it was a truly great service. Now days we're trying to move away as fast as we can.

    Ratings Breakdown

    5
    Ease of use
    2
    Value for money
    1
    Customer support
    4
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    Worked like charm years ago and did everything we ever wanted to. Neat debugging feature.
    Cons:
    In past 2 years Travis is dying in painful agony. The service is unreliable, sometimes not working for days. Status page is not updated at all. Support is non-existent - time to first response to an issue is a month now. Out of about 20 issues we raised in past year, not a single one was resolved.

    Reasons for choosing Travis CI

    It was much easier to use then Jenkins and was a great service in the past.

    Read More

    Bruce's profile

    Bruce B.

    Verified reviewer

    Research

    11-50 employees

    Used daily for more than 2 years

    Review source

    Reviewed February 2019

    Powerful, free and easy DevOps

    5

    Travis hasn't let me down yet. This services handles more than 90% of our builds.

    Ratings Breakdown

    4
    Ease of use
    5
    Value for money
    5
    Customer support
    5
    Functionality
    icon
    Pros:
    Travis does a few things really well: 1. Documentation - the documentation is extensive and complete, and one never has the feeling that there are "hidden features" that only the power users know about. 2. Speed - waiting for more than a few seconds for a build to start is extremely rare. 3. Deploy integrations - builds can be deployed to a set of services easily. This is probably the easiest way to set up continuous deployment if you're on a tight budget.
    Cons:
    The build environment can be somewhat restrictive, forcing one to choose language-specific base images and not giving access to the underlying VM.

    Read More

    Showing 1 - 10 of 129 Reviews

    See what companies are saying about Software Advice