# Castor EDC vs TrialKit - 2026 Comparison - Software Advice

> Castor EDC vs TrialKit - See how these products stack up against each other with real user reviews, product feature comparisons and screenshots. Find out which one is best for your organization.

Source: https://www.softwareadvice.com/data-collection/castor-edc-profile/vs/trialkit

---

[Home](https://www.softwareadvice.com/)

/

[Data Collection Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com/data-collection/)

/

Castor EDC vs TrialKit

Software Advice offers objective insights based on verified user reviews and independent product and market research. When our advisors match you to a software provider, we may earn a referral fee.

# Castor EDC vs TrialKit: Which is best for you?

Updated June 10, 2026

[Castor EDC](https://www.softwareadvice.com/data-collection/castor-edc-profile/)

4.7 [(204)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/data-collection/castor-edc-profile/reviews/)

[TrialKit](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/trialkit-profile/)

4.5 [(35)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/trialkit-profile/reviews/)

Add to Compare

Starting Price

Pricing available upon request

Pricing available upon request

Free Trial

Free Version

Screenshots  
and Demo

See all

See all

Top Rated  
  Features

Electronic Data Capture

4.70

Clinical Study Management

4.65

Patient Monitoring

4.64

See All

Data Verification

4.43

See All

Integrations

eCRF

See All

See All

Pros / Cons

-   The overall font size, helps visually as you do not need to scroll up and down allowing for overall viewing of the page.
    
-   The only issue I have is the time it takes to save a page before I can move onto the next.
    

Read more

-   Their goal is to support clinical research with cost-effective, easy-to-use solutions, and that is exactly what they do.
    
-   Very costly, not knowing what features are validated for trials, allowing us to believe that certain features like mobile-view are validated--however, this was not true and more than 50% trial participant failures in this mode requiring us early on to purchase additional development for a mobile app separately because the mobile view was not actually validated.
    

Read more

Ease-of-Use

Highest performing feature  
in the comparison

4.7/ 5

4.4/ 5

Value for Money

4.6/ 5

4.6/ 5

Customer Support

4.7/ 5

Highest performing feature  
in the comparison

4.8/ 5

Functionality

Highest performing feature  
in the comparison

4.5/ 5

4.3/ 5

Support Options

Email/Help Desk

FAQs/Forum

Knowledge Base

Phone Support

24/7 (Live Rep)

Chat

Email/Help Desk

FAQs/Forum

Knowledge Base

Phone Support

24/7 (Live Rep)

Chat

Training Options

In Person

Live Online

Webinars

Documentation

Videos

In Person

Live Online

Webinars

Documentation

Videos

FrontRunners

N/A

N/A

Advisor  
  Recommendations

N/A

N/A

Ideal Customer Size

Small

Medium

Large

Small

Medium

Large

Deployment Options

Cloud, SaaS, Web-Based

Desktop - Mac

Desktop - Windows

Desktop - Linux

Desktop - Chromebook

On-Premise - Windows

On-Premise - Linux

Mobile - Android

Mobile - iPhone

Mobile - iPad

Cloud, SaaS, Web-Based

Desktop - Mac

Desktop - Windows

Desktop - Linux

Desktop - Chromebook

On-Premise - Windows

On-Premise - Linux

Mobile - Android

Mobile - iPhone

Mobile - iPad

## Send this comparison chart to my inbox

## Popular Comparisons

[Google Forms vs Castor EDC](https://www.softwareadvice.com/data-collection/castor-edc-profile/vs/google-forms/)[Greenlight Guru Clinical vs TrialKit](https://www.softwareadvice.com/electronic-data-capture/smart-trial-profile/vs/trialkit/)[Jotform vs TrialKit](https://www.softwareadvice.com/market-research/jotform-profile/vs/trialkit/)[Viedoc vs TrialKit](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/trialkit-profile/vs/viedoc/)