It works very well for the purpose of research

Very flexible in the things you can build. Easy to operate and manage the different roles of people involved in the research project Smart calculating and 'if.. then' constructions

It would be easy to copy complete blocks

Easy to use, lots of features for example the patient invitations. It is easy to send structured questionnaires to enrolled subjects.

If you have multiple ongoing researches in RM, you have to click on several buttons to select the right research. I think, this could be easier.

The ease to create overviews. The possibility to customize the software to the company's needs.

The lack of a comprehensive manual or admin tutorials. The fact that audit trails and exports are not linked to each other. The fact that there are no standard settings to use the software as a back-office tool.

It is functional, but there are possibilities for improvement.

The Study Management module. It is very intuitive and clear.

The Data Management module. It is not very intuitive, for example when a new study team member, with already existing log-in, needs to be added to the team.

easy to use the software system, quicly response

I dont have any complaints about the software

I have worked with quit some data systems now, but I think it is safe to say that Research Manager is not one of my favorites. I think it can be easily improved!

I like that you can see all subjects, even when you are working on one particular subject. This makes is really easy to look back and forth between the subjects.

First, I really do not like the fact that you have to click the dates in the calender, instead of typing them. Even when typing them and the date is existing and correct it gives an error that the date field is blank. Second, I really do not like how the drugs have to be administrated. However, I do not know if this is a flaw on the side of my research manager, or the study we are completing the CRFs for. Anyway, it would be great to fill in therapies, instead of seperate drugs, since some drugs are used in multiple therapies. So for example, when a subjects has had more than 2 therapies, lets say neo-adjucvant and adjuvant carboplatin. Both therapies contain carboplatin, but the system as it is now does not make it easy to clarify the difference in doses of carbopatin or other details regarding the different therapies with carboplatin. Third and last, I do not like it that you have to click the plus to open the category with CRFs in it.It would be great if it is possible to open systemic therapy immediately, with all categories under it, when I click systemic therapy. Instead of clicking the plus of systemic therapy and then have to click the seperate systemic therapy form to really open it.

Good Experience with lot of learning

Designing and data entry is faster than other edc

Have some issue with the site adding in the serial number.

This software is easy to use and not fixed to one computer.

Till so far, I don't really heave thing that I didn't like so far.

I work for an orthopedic practice that collaborates with different medical device companies. Previously our work was paper-based but with RM we have been able to create and collect data in an efficient way. This platform is very user-friendly, with real-time data capturing and meets all the Good Clinical Practice and confidentiality criteria required in our practice.

There is no real-time troubleshooting option available. If the issues issnt addressed in the FAQ an email needs to be sent and in most of the cases the response is in dutch.

there is no problem while using research manager.

how the way research manager working on data capturing that is very nice. easily assess.

capturing all the data quickly. overall very good application

ResearchManager is goed bereikbaar en beantwoordt vragen snel en adequaat. Prettige organisatie.

Faciliteiten die ik nodig heb zijn in 1 systmeen geïntegreerd

Bouwen van databases is, zeker voor minder ervaren onderzoekers, niet erg intu"tief

Gebruikersvriendelijkheid, overzichtelijkheid, zelf aanpassingen kunnen maken oftewel leverancier vaak niet nodig, sleepfunctie om documenten te uploaden.

Het niet zelf rapportages kunnen maken.

Ik gebruik Research Manager voornamelijk als ERMS (Ethical Review Management System).Het zorgt voor dat het een overzichtelijk geheel waarin duidelijk te zien is wat de METC nodig heeft en welke documenten er zijn goedgekeurd voor gebruik. Communicatie met de betrokkenen zonder tussenpersoon is ook super. Elektronisch goedkeuren is ook heel handig.

Op dit moment weet ik niet wat ik nog verbeterd zou willen zien, maar ik gebruik het dan ook nog niet zo lang.

Fijne implementatiefase waarin veel mogelijk was en waarbij goede overleggen zijn gevoerd waarbij goed geluisterd werd naar de wensen.

Alle documenten op 1 plaats, audittrail mogelijk

Extra inloggen, lastig combineren met EPD

Goed toegankelijk, gebruiksvriendelijk, bij vragen/problemen goed te bereiken.

Wennen tov eerder systemen, oude gewoontes loslaten

Gebruiksgemak en klant ondersteuning, Mate waarin we uitleg kregen bij nieuwe gebruikers

nu geen, enige wat ik kan bedenken is dat de prijs hoger is dan gemiddeld maar verder heb ik mij hier te weinig in verdiept

Duidelijke statussen van verschillende stappen in het proces

Geen grote nadelen vanwege de intuitieve software

I like the overview I have when using the software

extra saving when uploading studydocuments.. when forgotten, the documents have to be attached/uploaded again

Easy to use program that maken it the best for me

Nothing, I really like the program and use it often

we use it for data collection for scientific studies

- easy in use - many possibilities - good option to use one database with multiple accounts, even from different companies or hospitals

i have no cons about the software, we use it a lot

Easy to use interface and simple data entry.

Not very attractive layout, more could be done for this.

See pros

For monitoring purposes, it is possible to see what documents are at site while not having to go to the sites, which saves travel costs. Also, I can upload documents myself, making sure the investigator site file is always up to date. This saves us all time and makes monitoring time on site much more efficient.

The system is rather slow sometimes also, the search functionality could be improved.

The software facilitates the process of filing a research application for ethical review. Navigation is instinctive and the different tabs give a clear overview of the relevant information.

To me the meaning of the different status is not always clear, so sometimes I don't know wheter I should wait or fill out a further step.

The software is clear for users, when uploading documents for a study. It tells you multiple times to save your changes, this is a plus!

If something is not applicable for your study, you still have to fill something in. Which is not always correct.

Easyness of uploading documents for EC review and receiving and answering questions

Printing/making exports is not possible for me