

PeopleFluent Software
About PeopleFluent
1 / 3



Image 1 of 3
PeopleFluent Compensation Management dashboard
Other Top Recommended Human Resources Software
PeopleFluent User Reviews
OVERALL RATING
Showing 8 reviews
Kelly
Company size: 11-50 employees
Industry: Staffing and Recruiting
Time used: Less than 2 years
Review Source
July 2018
There's a reason they're a leader in the field.
Pros
LOVE that it tracks from hiring to acceptance, and how to continue to engage the employee after hiring.
Cons
Nothing that I can really think of - I'm not into the nitty-gritty daily, but what i do utilize, I love.
Jacqualyn
Company size: 10,000+ employees
Industry: Computer Software
Time used: More than 2 years
Review Source
June 2018
Used PF for ATS
Pros
it was very easy to use - all workflows are on the same page and it was very user friendly. you can move candidates from one stage to the next very easily
Cons
Didnt have all of the bells and whistles of some other ATS's but I still rate it high for its ease of use.
Mia
Company size: 1,001-5,000 employees
Industry: Medical Practice
Time used: More than 2 years
Review Source
February 2018
Customer Service Needs Help
Pros
They take their time reviewing and researching the issue. They offer enhancements to their system at no extra charge.
Cons
Their SLA is 24 hours. In many cases, one would think that is one day, but they work on 8 hour days, which equates to 3 business days, unacceptable. By the time, the assign or review the ticket, a workaround was created and the data to research is no longer valid. Their response is a lot of times "how the system is designed". Makes me think, if they can't fix it, then that is their excuse. An excuse is not a resolution.
Tom
Company size: 201-500 employees
Industry: Staffing and Recruiting
Time used: Less than 2 years
Review Source
September 2018
Clients utilize PF for their VMS
Pros
Easy to navigate and use. Interaction with others on our team is easy to conduct and take action, respond. Reporting to client is clean and efficient.
Cons
Too many screens to navigate for simple use. Sometimes the communication can be a bit clunky, but overall pretty good
Kat
Company size: 11-50 employees
Industry: Staffing and Recruiting
Time used: Less than 2 years
Review Source
July 2018
Tricky to Learn
I work with PeopleFluent quite frequently and now that I know how to use it, I don't find it nearly so daunting.
Pros
Once you get to know the system, it's extremely robust. You can always go back and find candidates/files as needed.
Cons
It is a HUGE system and it can be very tricky to learn. Depending on your need, you may have to access a candidate record one of a few different ways and it can be tough to remember which is which.
Alyssa
Company size: 10,000+ employees
Industry: Medical Practice
Time used: Less than 6 months
January 2017
Not Bad, But Not Great
Overall I would say PeopleFluent is a good product, however, if I was going to recommend an ATS to someone it would be something more up to date.
Pros
Easy to use and customizable to whatever your recruitment workflow may be.
Cons
Integrations don't always seem to go well with the dated technology. Looks dated compared to newer ATS systems. Limited functionality. Overall dated technology they did not introduce a mobile friendly option until a year or so ago.
Tina
Industry: Staffing and Recruiting
Time used: Less than 6 months
September 2016
Good as VMS for large, nationwide corporations with many openings
Pros
All requisitions are organized in one place and you can communicate with hiring managers for the position and have a real time update on submissions from your company as well as other vendors to have an idea of the competition for each req.
Cons
Constantly had to rechange the password. Sometimes information is buried within subfolders and it can be labor intensive to analyze or even find data.
Bruce
Company size: 2-10 employees
Industry: Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
Time used: Less than 6 months
Review Source
May 2018
Look no further
Pros
In transportation compliance is important, we have a constant demand for safety and education.
Cons
the features were outstanding for our needs, but I would say that on a larger scale it could be exspensive