--- title: "Ant Media Server Software Reviews, Demo & Pricing - 2026" description: "Review of Ant Media Server Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs." source_url: "https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/" page_type: "product" language: "en" --- [Home](https://www.softwareadvice.com/) / [Live Streaming Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/) / Ant Media Server Software Advice offers objective insights based on verified user reviews and independent product and market research. When our advisors match you to a software provider, we may earn a referral fee. Overview [Reviews](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/reviews/)[Alternatives](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/alternatives/) # Ant Media Server Review From $109-$2,799/month Free version Free trial 3 plans On this page - Overview - User Interface - Popular Alternatives - Pricing and Plans - Features - Integrations - User Reviews - Popular Comparisons ## Overview Ant Media Server 4.8 [(159)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/reviews/) Pricing Starting at $109.00 flat rate per month ### About Ant Media Server Ant Media provides ready-to-use, highly scalable real-time video streaming (0.5 seconds latency) solutions for live video streaming needs. Based on customer requirements and preferences, it enables a live video streaming solution to be deployed easily and quickly on-premises or on public cloud networks such as AWS, Azure, and Alibaba Cloud. Visit our website at: https://antmedia.io/ ## Ant Media Server User Interface ## Popular Ant Media Server Alternatives Main Product Ant Media Server 4.8 [(159)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/reviews/) Ratings Breakdown - 4.67Ease of use - 4.60Value for money - 4.78Customer support - 4.57Functionality Pricing Starting at $109.00 per month Alternative Product [Zoom Workplace](https://www.softwareadvice.com/product/101384-Zoom-Video-Conferencing/) 4.6 [(14671)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/product/101384-Zoom-Video-Conferencing/reviews/) Ratings Breakdown - 4.59Ease of use - 4.52Value for money - 4.36Customer support - 4.54Functionality Pricing Starting at $14.99 per month Alternative Product [TikTok](https://www.softwareadvice.com/ecommerce/tiktok-profile/) 4.6 [(653)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/ecommerce/tiktok-profile/reviews/) Ratings Breakdown - 4.68Ease of use - 4.52Value for money - 4.09Customer support - 4.54Functionality Pricing Available upon request Alternative Product [Ecamm Live](https://www.softwareadvice.com/webinar/ecamm-live-profile/) 4.8 [(174)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/webinar/ecamm-live-profile/reviews/) Ratings Breakdown - 4.61Ease of use - 4.63Value for money - 4.76Customer support - 4.67Functionality Pricing Starting at $20.00 per month Alternative Product [Castr](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/castr-profile/) 4.7 [(446)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/castr-profile/reviews/) Ratings Breakdown - 4.74Ease of use - 4.66Value for money - 4.70Customer support - 4.57Functionality Pricing Starting at $12.50 per month Alternative Product [Dacast](https://www.softwareadvice.com/video-management/dacast-profile/) 4.3 [(230)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/video-management/dacast-profile/reviews/) Ratings Breakdown - 4.18Ease of use - 4.05Value for money - 4.14Customer support - 4.13Functionality Pricing Available upon request ## Ant Media Server Pricing and Plans Starting price: $109.00 per month Free Trial Free Version Monthly License (Enterprise Edition) $109.00 flat rate, per month Plan includes: - scalable - Free SDKs Annual License (Enterprise Edition) $1,068.00 flat rate, per year No plan information available Perpetual License (Enterprise Edition) $2,799.00 flat rate, one time No plan information available ## Ant Media Server Features - Popular features found in Live Streaming Audience Analytics Live Streaming Production Moderation Multistreaming - More features of Ant Media Server Activity Dashboard API Audience Engagement Brand Overlay Call Recording Chat/Messaging Closed Captions Collaboration Tools Communication Management Conferencing Customizable Branding Electronic Hand Raising Engagement Tracking Event Scheduling Filtering Interactive Content Live Chat Live Streaming Meeting Management Mobile Access Mobile Screen Support Monitoring Multi-Channel Distribution Multimedia Support Multiple Camera Feeds Multiple Format Support On-Demand Recording On-Demand Webcasting Performance Monitoring Presentation Streaming Privacy Options Real-Time Analytics Real-time Broadcasting Real-Time Chat Real-Time Data Recording Reporting/Analytics Reporting & Statistics Screen Recording Session Recording Social Media Integration Social Media Streaming Social Sharing Split/Multi-Screen SSL Security Third-Party Integrations Two Way Audio & Video Two-Way Audio & Video User Management Video Archiving Video Call Recording Video Conferencing Video Management Video Streaming Video Support Whiteboard ## Ant Media Server Integrations iOS14 Integration rated undefined from -1 review Android 11 Integration rated undefined from -1 review Red Hat Enterprise Linux Integration rated undefined from -1 review Redis Enterprise Integration rated undefined from -1 review Ubuntu Integration rated undefined from -1 review CentOS Linux Integration rated undefined from -1 review See all 13 integrations ## Ant Media Server User Reviews ## Ant Media Server customer ratings - Overall rating: 4.8/5 - Total reviews: 159 ### Rating distribution - 5 stars: 128 reviews (81%) - 4 stars: 30 reviews (19%) - 3 stars: 1 reviews (1%) - 2 stars: 0 reviews (0%) - 1 star: 0 reviews (0%) ### Secondary ratings - Ease of use: 4.7/5 - Value for money: 4.6/5 - Customer support: 4.8/5 - Functionality: 4.6/5 --- ### Exceptional support quality - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Alexey F. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Sports - Company size: 51-200 employees - Product usage: Used daily for less than 6 months - Reviewed: July 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered Powerful and easy to use solution for broadcasting. Fast deployment, versatile and stable. Reasonable pricing! #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 5/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 5/5 #### Pros The product support is just fantastic! We wanted to try the product for video broadcasting and just after leaving a request on their site I was contacted by ANT and representative who has explained me the different deployment options. He has also organized a technical meeting where their specialist has done a demo of the product, helped configured the stream. support was available later during the deployment stage for optimizing the video quality and to solve an issue with the AWS auto-managed deployment. Very reactive in responding to our messages, helpful in providing documentation. I was really shocked by such a high quality of the product support. I've rarely experienced similar attitude in my 25 years of work in IT. #### Cons we were using the stream through vpn so some MTU adjustment was needed on the camera stream side. probably not related to Ant Media Server but rather to the transmission protocol. --- ### Powerful Research and Campus Streaming Tool, But Requires Technical Know-How - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Mayank Y. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Higher Education - Company size: 501-1000 employees - Product usage: Used daily for less than 12 months - Reviewed: July 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered For me as an undergrad researcher in Computer Science, Ant Media Server was an invaluable tool. What made it so special for us was the MoQ support as this puts us a step ahead in terms of networking research. Its deployment on our university cloud not only addressed our concerns related to the privacy of data but commercial providers of SaaS could not offer this either. Nevertheless, there were quite a few challenges faced by my undergrad assistants in deploying it for the first time because the documentation is quite technical and requires prior knowledge regarding the configuration of TURN/STUN server and SSL certificate management. Apart from that, even though it works wonders after being configured, it does not meet our needs in terms of dashboard as we had to deploy some additional analytics outside the server for publication purposes. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 4/5 - Value for money: 5/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 5/5 #### Pros Research & Academic Value (MoQ support): The new addition of MoQ (Media over QUIC) in v3.0 is a goldmine for our networking lab. This will enable us to play around with next-gen transport protocols for our thesis without having to build our own WebRTC stack. On-Premise Installations (IRB and privacy considerations): As a university, we work with student data and IRB considerations. On-premise installations mean that we do not have to upload any student faces or videos from the lab to any third-party cloud services. Student-Friendly Pricing Model: Thanks to the community edition, I was able to build my capstone project without going through the process of getting budget from the department. Perpetual licenses are also very useful for university labs that have servers running for decades. Multi-protocol on the same server for different applications: RTSP for campus security cameras, WebRTC for interactive language classes and HLS for live commencement ceremony broadcasts. #### Cons No Comprehensive Academic Analytic Data on Dashboard: As a scientist, I need detailed analytics such as packet loss graphs, jitter over time, viewer geolocation to produce my scientific work. The current dashboard provides only simple information on CPU/Memory, so I am forced to send logs to Grafana. Limitations of Community Edition: There is no GPU acceleration and auto-scaling in the free edition. We can't do massive (up to 1,000 users) conferences simulation for our research without switching to Enterprise version of the application that needs proper financing from grants. Difficulties with Updating the Application Version: Updating the application version is a difficult process, especially in universities when we have legacy code built for previous APIs and the upgrade procedure usually takes a whole weekend of regression testing. #### Reasons for switching to Ant Media Server Ant Media Server provides true ultra-low latency (~0.5 seconds) with native WebRTC support, which is critical for my real-time interactive research. Wowza couldn't deliver the same sub-second performance for WebRTC streaming, and Ant Media's recent MoQ (Media over QUIC) support offers cutting-edge protocol experimentation that Wowza doesn't have --- ### After Sales Service - Thank you - Overall rating: 4/5 - Reviewer: Rory D. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Information Technology and Services - Company size: 2-10 employees - Product usage: Used monthly for less than 12 months - Reviewed: August 2025 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered My experience has been good. You have to ask for help let them know you are having issues and they will earnestly try to help you. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 5/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 5/5 #### Pros I had a small issue, our SSL certificate did not renew, this prevented us from streaming webrtc. I sent an email to support and they responded quickly. It was handled within 24 hours. #### Cons I have not had any real issues, support is as good as you can get. If there was one issue, it's speaking to a live person. You know you are in a panic, your system is down who to you call? This is always nice to know you can speak to a live agent. --- ### Ant Media Server Review: Powerful Low-Latency Streaming with Some Setup Effort - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Fran A. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Education Management - Company size: 11-50 employees - Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years - Reviewed: May 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered My overall experience with Ant Media Server has been very positive. After using it for several months in a production environment, I can confidently say it’s one of the strongest self-hosted solutions available for ultra-low latency live streaming. The server excels at delivering what it promises: sub-second WebRTC streaming that feels truly real-time, combined with great flexibility across protocols and easy integration through its APIs and SDKs. We successfully built and scaled interactive live features that would have been much more expensive using purely cloud-based SaaS platforms. The ability to run it on our own infrastructure gives us full control over costs, data privacy, and customization — which has been a big advantage for our project. That said, it’s not a “plug-and-play” solution. There’s a noticeable learning curve when moving beyond basic setups, and we had to invest time in proper architecture planning, especially around clustering and monitoring. Once we got past those initial hurdles and optimized our deployment, the server proved to be stable and performant. In summary, Ant Media Server strikes an excellent balance between powerful features, cost-effectiveness, and control. It’s not perfect, but for teams that need low-latency streaming and are willing to put in the upfront engineering effort, it’s a fantastic choice. I would definitely recommend it and plan to continue using it in future projects. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 4/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 4/5 #### Pros The sub-500ms latency with WebRTC is genuinely impressive. In our interactive sessions (like live Q&A, virtual events, and real-time collaboration tools), the near-instant delivery makes the experience feel natural and responsive — a huge improvement over traditional HLS-based solutions we've tried before. #### Cons While Ant Media Server delivers excellent performance overall, it’s not without some rough edges. The steep learning curve for advanced configurations was the biggest challenge. Setting up clustering, auto-scaling, proper security (tokens, SSL, stream authentication), and fine-tuning performance required significant time and trial-and-error. The documentation is decent for basic setups, but it often lacks clear, real-world examples for more complex production deployments. Monitoring and observability could be much better. The dashboard shows raw metrics (CPU, memory, bitrate, etc.), but it doesn’t provide deep insights into stream health, viewer experience, or why a particular issue might be occurring. Debugging problems under load sometimes felt like guesswork. We also hit scaling limits on a single instance. Even on a powerful server, we started seeing instability and unexpected behavior once we exceeded around 400–500 concurrent WebRTC connections. Horizontal scaling works, but it adds complexity and requires careful architecture planning. Finally, adaptive bitrate (ABR) quality wasn’t always perfect. In some cases, we noticed visible quality drops or inconsistencies when the server switched between resolutions, especially under varying network conditions. It’s good, but not as smooth as some cloud-managed solutions we’ve tested. #### Reasons for switching to Ant Media Server To improve an important service in our company. --- ### Scalable, Developer-Friendly Ultra low latency Streaming Solution with Great Value - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Rahul k. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Information Technology and Services - Company size: 11-50 employees - Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years - Reviewed: February 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered Overall, our experience is very positive. Ant Media Server has proven to be stable, scalable, ultra low latency and production-ready for every size of broadcasting scenarios. It would not be an exaggeration to say that Ant Media Server is one of the best products I have worked with. The product quality is excellent, and the performance is consistently reliable. Equally impressive is their support team. highly responsive, knowledgeable, and genuinely committed to helping customers succeed. Once you partner with them, they support you throughout the journey and ensure you reach your goals with confidence. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 5/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 5/5 #### Pros We used Ant Media Server primarily for mass broadcasting and real-time video streaming use cases, and it has been a solid, reliable solution. The SDKs and APIs are well-designed and easy to integrate into web, desktop (using electron) and mobile applications. Documentation is clear, and implementation is straightforward for me as a developer. WebRTC performance is excellent for real-time broadcasting consider 1-1 call or one to many. Security: Token-based authentication, stream-level security, and access control features are robust and flexible. We were able to integrate it securely within our existing architecture without major customization. Architecture Fit: Ant Media fit seamlessly into our application architecture. We deployed it in a scalable environment and integrated it with our backend services and CDN layer without friction. We have implemented this in the following technologies (Node, react, angular, nextjs, laravel, react native, wordpress). If i talk about learning curve, It is between easy and moderate. If you have prior experience with streaming technologies (RTMP, WebRTC, HLS), onboarding is quite smooth. Even for teams new to WebRTC, the documentation and sample projects make it manageable. I had tried "kurento", "wowza" and some open source media server in my early days. It was really very frustrating to debug issues and get resolved. With Ant Media Server, you need not to worry about streaming issues anymore. Just focus on your business. Now I say: Streaming means Ant media Server. What they are providing is really value for money, For every business use case they have best plans available to subscribe. I tested their 14 days free trial before integrating into my live streaming platform. Plugin development on top of Ant Media Server is very helpful for developers to create some new features and functionality. #### Cons Not exactly a negative, but during initial setup we needed clarification on a few configuration and scaling aspects. However, their support team responded very quickly and provided clear guidance. So while some areas required clarification, support quality compensated for it. I am very impressed with their improvement on auto-scaling setup, In initial times, it was a long process. Now a days it will take max 5-10 minutes for the setup. #### Reasons for switching to Ant Media Server Easy integration, proper documentation, value for money and a great support from team. --- ### Smooth Migration, Magic Streaming - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Hoseah K. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Broadcast Media - Company size: Self-Employed - Product usage: Used weekly for less than 6 months - Reviewed: April 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered Moving from Red5 to Ant Media has been a big upgrade for us. The installation was smooth, and from the first day we enjoyed low latency streaming that feels instant. The dashboard is simple, clear, and gives us full control without stress. For our streaming app, Ant Media has truly worked magic, reliable, fast, and easy to manage. We are happy with the Community Edition and grateful for the support. It has made our journey smoother, and we confidently recommend it to others. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 5/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 5/5 #### Pros What impressed me most is the low latency streaming, it feels almost instant, even on mobile. I love the local dashboard is clean and easy to navigate, giving me full control without stress. Migration from Red5 was smooth, and Ant Media has delivered reliable performance from day one. For our streaming app, it truly works magic and makes management simple. #### Cons So far, I haven’t faced major issues, but the initial setup required some learning curve compared to Red5. Documentation could be a bit more detailed for beginners, especially around advanced configurations. Apart from that, the experience has been smooth #### Reasons for switching to Ant Media Server We moved from Red5 to Ant Media because we needed a modern solution with true low latency streaming and a dashboard that is simple but powerful. Red5 served us for a while, but Ant Media gave us smoother performance, easier management, and better support for our growing streaming app. The migration was straightforward, and the improvement was clear from day one. --- ### 24/7 live stream uptime secure with AMS. - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Aaron C. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Broadcast Media - Company size: Self-Employed - Product usage: Used daily for less than 12 months - Reviewed: June 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered I've had a great experience with Ant Media Server and the engineer, who I had a couple of online meetings with. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 4/5 - Value for money: 4/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 3/5 #### Pros The ease of use and reliability of the server is critical for our operation where we push out a live 24/7 video stream. Ant Media Server has been the missing piece in the jigsaw for us in this regard. #### Cons Its UI is a little bit clunky, but I'm only writing something here because you've asked. It works fine. #### Reasons for switching to Ant Media Server One or two years ago, they just began price gouging, and prices went up. In my case, 4x. --- ### Secure, Stable and Easy Video Streaming. - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Rob H. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Entertainment - Company size: 2-10 employees - Product usage: Used weekly for less than 2 years - Reviewed: May 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered The ease of setting AMS up makes it my go to choice for my video streaming service. It's secure, stable and easy to setup. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 5/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 5/5 #### Pros I love how easy and quick it is to setup Ant Media Server. And the API makes automation tasks easy too. It's also very easy to setup SSL on AMS, making your stream secure so it is easily embedable and integrated into my websites. It's also very stable. #### Cons Threre is a slight latency between going live and reaching the server, but I use the Community Edition, in the Pro edition the latency is significantly reduced. #### Reasons for choosing Ant Media Server Price, and ease of setup made Ant Media Server the choice for me. #### Reasons for switching to Ant Media Server AMS is so much better, it's more feature reach and easier to set up and secure, and the monitoring features are far superior. --- ### Solid low-latency WebRTC platform once you get past the setup - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Ishmael C. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Consumer Services - Company size: Self-Employed - Product usage: Used weekly for free trial - Reviewed: July 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered We selected Ant Media Server Enterprise for a real-time live commerce platform after evaluating several WebRTC and low latency alternatives. It won mainly on official mobile SDK support and built-in clustering, which meant we did not have to build our own clients or stitch together separate services. It runs on self-managed VPS infrastructure under Docker in a swarm setup, with the media layer handling streaming and delivery while our application layer stays authoritative for business logic. We use the data channel narrowly, only for broadcasting confirmed events to viewers, and that has been reliable. Broadcaster device handover also worked better than we expected. Getting there took longer than planned, mostly due to documentation gaps and clustering setup, but support was responsive and filled in what the docs did not. For a project that needs sub-second latency with real mobile clients, we would choose it again. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 4/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 5/5 #### Pros Sub-second WebRTC latency is the main reason we picked it. The official React Native, iOS, and Android SDKs saved us weeks compared to alternatives where we would have had to build clients ourselves. Origin-edge clustering works well for scaling viewers without overloading the ingest node. The data channel is useful for pushing real-time events alongside the stream instead of running a separate socket layer. Hourly licensing at a low per-node rate made it affordable to test at small scale before committing. Support was responsive and we got direct contact with a real engineer instead of a ticket queue. #### Cons The licensing side is confusing when you self host, especially once autoscaling is involved. It is not clear how keys are supposed to work across nodes that come and go, and the docs do not really explain it, so we had to ask support to be sure we were doing it right. --- ### Will definitely recommend AntMedia! - Overall rating: 5/5 - Reviewer: Morne d. - Verified reviewer: Yes - Industry: Computer Software - Company size: 11-50 employees - Product usage: Used weekly for less than 2 years - Reviewed: August 2026 - Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered We used Ant Media Server to build a realtime audio streaming solution for a major international customer, where sub-second latency was a non-negotiable requirement. It delivered consistently; we measured latency at about or just under 1 sec. Deployment on AWS was straightforward; setup didn't require extensive tuning or workarounds to get a stable, performant configuration running. When we needed help during a version upgrade, their support team responded quickly and resolved our issue efficiently. Great client support. #### Ratings breakdown - Ease of use: 5/5 - Value for money: 5/5 - Customer support: 5/5 - Functionality: 4/5 #### Pros Getting the environment up and running and streaming your first sample app, was quick and painless. AntMedia was one of the only solutions that offered sub-second latency on audio stream capabilities. #### Cons Upgrading the solution on AWS was a challenge, and we need to request assistance from the AntMedia support team to assist us in achieving the upgrade. --- Showing 1 - 10 of 159 Reviews [See All Reviews](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/reviews/) ## Ant Media Server Popular Comparisons [Zoom Workplace vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/compare/101384-Zoom-Video-Conferencing/vs/346570-ant-media-server/)[TikTok vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/tiktok/)[Ecamm Live vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/ecamm-live/)[Castr vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/castr/)[Dacast vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/dacast/)[OneStream Live vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/compare/231484-OneStream/vs/346570-ant-media-server/)[Streamyard vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/streamyard/)[Live Now - Live Stream vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/live-now-live-stream/)[Restream vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/restream/)[SoundCloud vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/soundcloud/)[Kaltura - Agentic Digital Experiences Platform vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/kaltura-video-platform/)[Flutin vs Ant Media Server](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/vs/flutin-live/) [Compare All Alternatives](https://www.softwareadvice.com/live-streaming/ant-media-server-profile/alternatives/) ## See what companies are saying about Software Advice