Shortcut
Shortcut
About Shortcut
Awards and Recognition
Shortcut Pricing
14-day free trial, after which pricing is as follows: Billed annually: Free (1 - 10 users): $0 per month Team: $8.50 per user per month Business: $12 per user per month Enterprise: Request a demo via website Billed monthly: Free (1 - 10 users): $0 per month Team: $10 per user per month Business: $16 per user per month Enterprise: Request a demo via website
Starting price:
$8.50 per month
Free trial:
Available
Free version:
Available

Other Top Recommended Project Management Software
Most Helpful Reviews for Shortcut
1 - 5 of 355 Reviews
Kévin
Verified reviewer
Computer Software, 11-50 employees
Used daily for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed December 2019
Does its job!
Great tool for managing the team's tasks and it's especially good for teams working with Scrum. It offers a lot of customizability, thus, you can change it to tailor your needs.
CONSThe learning curve for someone who never worked with it can be steep at the beginning. But after learning the basics it gets easy.
Reasons for switching to Shortcut
The company I previously worked on used JIRA.
Lee-ann
Marketing and Advertising, 51-200 employees
Used daily for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
4
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed November 2021
Shortcut (previously Clubhouse) has been a great improvement for us.
Overall our experience has been great. Less has been falling through the cracks, and we're able to actively manage & prioritize our development with ease. The application is enjoyed by both the development team & the management team, so everyone is benefitting from our switch to Shortcut.
PROS1. The app is very easy to configure & set up. 2. The user experience is seamless & functionality is very self-explanatory. 3. There are multiple ways to configure each component, so you can set up the app according to what works best for you & your company. (No "one size fits all" model.) 4. The ability to set up different workflows for different departments has been a huge help for us.
CONS1. It's a little hard to envision how each of the components should be set up for your organization when you're first getting in there (i.e., projects, workflows, milestones, epics, stories), so we ended up changing the setup as we went along after the initial configuration. This wasn't necessarily a bad thing, as it allowed us to improve the way we currently did things. 2. The biggest issue we have now, after using the app for a while, is that stories do not populate into the Gantt charts, only epics. This means if we have one-off tasks that are added as stories, those do not pull into the report we'd like. For that reason, we have to set up an entire epic just to set up a single story, for reporting purposes. I think it would be great if you had the option to pull the Gantt reports at the epic or story-level.
Reason for choosing Shortcut
N/A - Shortcut was the only application we looked at, based on a recommendation from one of our developers. (He had used it previously for a personal project.)
Reasons for switching to Shortcut
While Teamwork was great at managing individuals' tasks, looking at overall projects, and the current status & priority of each of the tasks within those projects, was not quite as user-friendly. Overall this was a great tool for the development team but not for those managing those folks.
Kirsty
E-Learning, 201-500 employees
Used daily for less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
3
EASE OF USE
3
FUNCTIONALITY
3
Reviewed November 2021
Short may be an overstatement for shortcut
This is an adequate task management/tracking software. It has a fantastic Zendesk integration and multiple customizable fields. It also boasts decent search and filtering functions but it isn't particularly user-friendly and filling out all the fields that make it function well takes a great deal of time (hence the title of this review).
CONSThere are no AI/smart suggestions for related epic/team fields so every time you make a new ticket you have to search through them by scratch. They also don't offer a great tag database or tag definitions so you have to create naming conventions separately offline. You also can't use rich text in story descriptions.
Anonymous
11-50 employees
Used daily for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed January 2023
Powerful project planning
Shortcut is easy to use but very powerful, and has a clean, intuitive interface. It offers a wide range of features, including project planning, task management, and collaboration tools. The software integrates well with other tools, such as Slack.
CONSThe per-user price is a bit steep if you need access to all of Shortcut's features.
Reasons for switching to Shortcut
Shortcut is definitely more powerful than GitHub's projects - but it comes at a price.
Thomas
Automotive, 51-200 employees
Used daily for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed November 2021
Shortcut (formerly Clubhouse) is a great task management tool for development teams
Before switching to Shortcut, we used Jira. While Jira has plenty of features, we found it a bit cumbersome and the performance of the interface was atrocious (everything single task was incredibly slow, even the most basic activities had a noticeable delay). The first major benefit we saw with Shortcut was the speed of interaction - instead of waiting for the interface to catch up, we could just log in and get things done. The integrations with various source control platforms (we use the Gitlab integration) also helps keep task statuses up to date without even having to open the web interface. Overall the speed of the interface and the available integrations lead to a feeling that Shortcut never "gets in our way".
CONSWe started out paying for Shortcut (when it was still called Clubhouse), but were soon switched to a free plan without even having to ask. Although this was a nice gesture on their part, they then released a beta of their new product called Write. This beta is only available for paying users, which is understandable, but having been moved to a free plan meant we couldn't access it. This isn't a major issue, but starting our subscription back up would require going through the approval process with our accounting department again so we've just stayed on the free plan without access to Write so far.
Reasons for switching to Shortcut
Jira was incredibly slow and a bit clunky, while Shortcut surpasses performance expectations and just works how we want it to.