The facility and the flexibility of setup, and ease of use for administrators and final users.

Nothing. All modules used were simple and efficient.

We have constructed two solutions : - a project portfolio, in which we had two types of portfolio (build / run) - a ticket portfolio We have always succeeded in doing what we need, without specific developpement. All you need is to know what you want to obtain, and then organize the objects in Triskell to do the job.

The security of the data (you can encrypt the data). The look and feel of the solution, that you can totaly adapt to your need. The ease of creating the screens, and modifying them, without loosing anything.

You need to anticipate how you will grant rights in your solution, and sometimes it's not easy to change, although it's not impossible.

It is a basically easy to use tool that helps the team accomplish our basic PM needs.

Triskell helps to manage our project portfolio and calendar, and also enables us to ensure all projects have gone through the appropriate enhancement request approval process that we require internally.

It can be a bit clunky and the user interface is not super clean. It could be better in terms of integrations with other software, especially CRM.

A great product that evolves with time and incorporates various customer needs into its roadmap.

Triskell precisely reflects how your business operates. Like many other tools on the market, the modules/objects created are not based on a "Project" model with unnecessary features. Indeed, each object/module will have its own features, its own life cycle, and its own attributes. Everything is configurable and adaptable. From Security and role management, creation of objects and sub-objecst to infinity, to the establishment of an organization at scale. Overall, Triskell can do it all. It's kind of the Swiss Army knife of PPM tools. Moreover, everyone benefits from version upgrades at the same time. No versionning of product : everyone has the same product.

It does it all, but occasionally falls slightly short compared to certain tools in the market dedicated to specific functionalities.

The underlying concepts are very powerful, allowing you to gradually adapt your implementation to the growing maturity of your teams. You can support both project activities and BAU activities to track your activity without having to twist the solution as in many other products (by creating dummy tasks to support time tracking on BAU for example).

After years of use and numerous recommendations during my consulting assignments, I haven't found any significant drawbacks.