

AuditBoard Software
FrontRunners
About AuditBoard
1 / 6






Image 1 of 6
Dashboard
Other Top Recommended Risk Management Software
AuditBoard User Reviews
OVERALL RATING
Showing 1 - 5 of 56 reviews
Charanpreet "Preet"
Verified reviewer
Company size: 10,000+ employees
Industry: Construction
Time used: More than 2 years
Review Source: Capterra
October 2021
Ease of use
Pros
Workstream module allows you to easily obtain documentation from multiple control owners seamlessly
Cons
Occasional glitches with website, such as website redirecting you to home page when beginning a search
David
Company size: 201-500 employees
Industry: Banking
Time used: Less than 12 months
Review Source: Capterra
March 2022
Would Purchase Again
Overall the experience has been great with AuditBoard. We were able to customize the software to our preferences and the requirements of our organization. The pricing for the software and the ability to customize to our liking was big benefit and a main reason we went with AuditBoard. It allowed us to simplify processes for a similar price as the previous software with no customization. I would recommend them to my next employer if they weren't a customer already.
Pros
When we considered AuditBoard, we determined that we needed a file repository, templates, and an audit issue tracking software. I have to say we have been very pleased with the product that AuditBoard offers. AuditBoard brought the individual auditors together with uniform processes. Prior to AuditBoard audit reports were written differently depending on the auditor. After implementation the audit reports have a singular voice.
Cons
What we least liked is that we were told that an API connection could be done in AuditBoard and our existing software of SalesForce. It was represented in the sales pitch that it would be similar to "plug and play" formats. After implementation we discovered that it is possible, but our internal IT department would need to spend six months on a build process. In the end, we abandoned the API connection and taught the business partners to use AuditBoard because it was easier (even though they are reluctant to do so) and did not involve the IT department resources.
Reasons for choosing AuditBoard
AuditBoard appeared to be a similar flow to the workflows we already used. Pricing and customizable capabilities.
Reasons for switching to AuditBoard
AuditBoard was more customizable and, in my opinion, easier to use for our smaller organization and audit department. Highbond was a little more cumbersome and riddled with manual steps or processes as the audit was performed. AuditBoard has a more simple flow and, in my opinion, is easier for the auditors to learn and use. Our auditors discovered during implementation that AuditBoard was setup very similar to the audit processes we were used to and it was not difficult to convince them to use the software.
Rosemary
Company size: 501-1,000 employees
Industry: Oil & Energy
Time used: Less than 6 months
Review Source: Capterra
October 2016
SOX Hub Experience
We have been using SOXHUB for a few months and have very happy with the ease of use they system provides. There are some basic functionality features (e.g. additional reporting capabilities, issue tracking, etc) I wish the system had immediately available, but I have been told some of these features are in the works. Overall, we are happy with the purchase thus far.
Pros
Ease of Use
Cons
Reporting capabilities & Issue Tracking
Meagan
Company size: 501-1,000 employees
Industry: Medical Devices
Time used: Less than 12 months
Review Source: Capterra
October 2021
Integrated audit, risk, and compliance system
We implemented Auditboard to move on from excel worksheets and trackers living in a Sharepoint with frequent emails sent internally and to control owners. For our internal audit team, it's entirely changed the way we organize our work, and for the control owners, they have loved the tool because they get their own customized dashboard which tells them exactly what controls they are responsible for, whether there are any issues, and also is the only method that they are sent audit requests.
Pros
Version control is no longer an issue. We can share documents across our internal audit, compliance, management, and up to the board with full and complete information. Auditboard has customizable dashboard that we use for reporting that once set up, are easy to refresh at a moments notice for up to date information. The Auditboard support team also listens to their feedback from customers and is constantly working towards adding new features to meet customized needs of each team member and industry.
Cons
There is a lot of customization that you can do with this tool which is why it makes it so valuable, but you have to prepare yourself to spend some time learning the ins and outs of the tool. Fortunately, Auditboard offers many web-lessons to educate you on the tool, and the customer service is excellent when you need some additional help.
Reasons for choosing AuditBoard
Auditboard is feature-rich and quickly responds to adding and expanding their current offerings. We wanted a tool that we knew could be a long-term solution, and would grow with us. Additionally, we started with SOXHUB but know that we can expand into Auditboard's other offerings such as RiskOversight, CrossComply, and OpsAudit, and wanted a platform that could maintain integrated record for a single source of truth, but also could scale and meet needs for risk and compliance in the future.
Courtney
Company size: 1,001-5,000 employees
Industry: Banking
Time used: More than 2 years
Review Source: Capterra
June 2021
All-in-One Audit System
We are happy with the vendor and the system.
Pros
The system is easy to learn and fast to use. We gained time efficiencies compared to our old system (spell check, file upload, synch editing, single input for control description changes updates narratives as well, etc.). The customer service team is quick and helpful. Our business process owners love the SOX controls certification process and we are now working to built out the documentation requests using Workstream, which I think will be an improvement over email. We find the Excel export of system data extremely helpful for many things, and all workpapers and support can also easily and quickly be extracted for distribution to external auditors or examiners.
Cons
When we first adopted Risk Oversight , we lost some functionality we had with our former risk assessments. The AuditBoard engineering team has since worked with us to improve this though. At this time, my only continued wish is that we could link audit workpapers to the risks and controls to show where they are tested more easily. Also, I demoed the Resource and Scheduling module before it was fully built (unsure if the product is now ready for launch) but it was not capable of doing complex audit scheduling for controls testing and non-audit work such as education or administration at the time I viewed it. I hope to look at the improved solution again in the future and re-consider.
Reasons for choosing AuditBoard
Users who viewed demonstrations voted for AuditBoard. Ease of use and reasonable cost. Less traditional system, yet built specifically for auditors.
Reasons for switching to AuditBoard
Our former system was being sunset, it was outdated anyway. We did not care for the replacement product being offered or cost of it.