This solved a huge reporting problem for us as our old software did not allow custom reports.

The best part about Apricot is how customizable it is - even for a non-technical person (like me) I am able to implement customized forms and reports.

Connect features (where clients fill out paperwork directly) rely on client email addresses. This could be improved if it accepted usernames or cell numbers (not all my clients have email addresses). In addition, there are 3 ways to track groups attendance right now in Apricot (all reported separately) with different functions - this is a bit confusing and I wish was better integrated.

This system helps us track our services very well and with a great level of detail. It has been challenging incorporating our entire org into it because of the cost. We cannot afford to have all the users we need because their pricing is cost-per-user.

The product is easy to use and highly customizable. If you understand the system (which takes a lot of self-led learning), it can really be a powerful tool.

The cost is the most prohibitive part of this software. Also, it's a bit difficult to find training or tutorials for specific things.

Apricot should be able to track all client program activity, assessments, expenses, case management, and outcomes. We have only recently had our system re-designed after two years of not being able to do what we needed, so we haven't seen this level of performance yet. This is our first month online with the correctly re-designed system. Since we are having to manually migrate data, we will still not be able to pull more than monthly data for a while even though we signed contracts for Apricot almost four years.

It is customizable to your needs. It had a user-friendly design with CTK Technology. CTK was very knowledgeable about their product and focused on helping non-profits with their tracking needs.

Social Solutions bought out CTK right before we signed the contract. They didn't have knowledgeable staff and so our system was designed poorly and never functioned properly. We had to hire an outside contractor that had many years of experience with Apricot (under CTK Tech) to re-design our system this year. When we tried to get Social Solutions to migrate the last two years of data that wouldn't populate correctly, they wanted to charge us a permanent monthly fee to transfer the data from their Apricot design to our newly re-designed forms in Apricot. So we are having to manually transfer two years of data. They have also recently increased their annual fees significantly.

Product ease of use/implementation with our org.q

I dont care for changes that are made during the reporting period.