Good reputation from peers Easier communication with customers recognized as UX professional

Very fast designing process including the magic ALT-click. The concept of State for screens and the associated navigation pane The animation timeline that is intuitive and easy to use. Regular updates that brings new stuffs based on user requests. I really appreciate this approach that most companies don't put in practice. The Sharing functionality that is easy to use and allow us to show and collect feedback of users. In the last versions, the integration of Google Fonts The screenparts that help us to go faster by reusing parts including animations and states Lat but not least, the user support is one of the best I had. Thanks again to these guys!

It's still tricky to use it behind our company firewall. Seems to be fixed in the lasts versions but still unstable. e.g. it lost the sign in quite often. The pricing policy is quite expensive so we limit our number of licences.

I love the fact that we can make it so realistic it looks and behaves like the real tool and allows us to test. The creation of a URL we can share with the teams and update is great too. The animations are great! Very easy for the UX team to show the Dev team what we need. Customer support is awesome!! Here is a company that really listens to users and develops features we really need and use.

I would like and enhances ability to control fonts (add my own) and also control the look of scroll bars.

Overall been fairly positive but it seems that infragistic until recently didn't invest much time improving the product.

We use the product because its pretty quick to produce a prototype. Looking forward to the new code generation feature for Blazor.

The control toolbox is limited and never seems to be updated. The portal where you can find public projects to learn from is sparse and it seems that Infragistics never contributes new ones to review and only has a couple of examples. The customer license portal is limited as well.

I got to use this program for one of my IT classes in which we had to develop an app prototype to solve or remedy a social program. Aside from this, I have taught the basics of this class (elements, interactions, animations, etc) to several coworkers at my job at Rutgers University.

I really like the base version of the software because it is free and has enough features to be relevant and make a good prototype. I like how there is a free version and the chance to get an academic license because students really enjoy using the software to make prototypes and express their ideas. I enjoy the elements provided, features and the options for viewports. The prototype can be as advanced or as simple as the person wants it to be. I like the ability to save my projects directly to my personal workspace which makes it easy to work on the go.

The program can be pretty confusing to use if you overlook the tutorials and video that are presented to you from Infragistics. I personally teach a course on App Design Prototype and I use Indigo to do so. I present a demonstration in the class and show the students where everything is and how things work. The students really enjoy the demo and it helps them understand the software. I think that the Indigo Essentials version should still let you share your prototypes with people via links! Is there a way to delete projects I have saved to my personal workspace?

Ability to create interactive prototypes with animations quickly and also ability to sync with Sketch to reuse artifacts . Usability testing is something which starting to get used in our workflow.

Restrictions on Fonts and Libraries pushes me to use Sketch more often and since Sketch is catching up on prototyping ...value of using Indigostudio is getting low because of these limitations

My overall experience with App Builder has been pretty good. The App Builder has allowed to create simple prototypes, but the functionalities can be a bit confusing when there’s a lot of required actions.

This software that Indigo Design has equipped its users to create prototypes is great. It’s easy to understand when you are going through the motion of understanding the app.

My least favorite features is the division between the different applications in Indigo Builder and the functionalities of the applications. The software can be a bit hard to use because some of the functionality are unavailable or can only be used for certain actions.

It helps me easily create attractive prototypes to present to management and our product design team.

As a software engineer who works on legacy software with an unfriendly UI I thought "I'll bet I can come up with something better." Indigo Studio makes it easy to develop a prototype of a better way that I can present to management and our product designers. I really like that I can easily create not just static mockups, but functional prototypes. And from an engineering perspective, it's nice that there's no code involved so management can't say "It looks great. Ship it!" It really is just a prototype.

I wish the included tools were a bit more customizable. For instance, backgrounds can only be one color, not a gradient. Also, the chart control only allows you to set the type of chart but nothing more about it, though that can be explained away as "it's just to show a chart goes here." Finally, it would be nice if the code snippets panel was editable to allow for even more customization.

-Make High fidelity wireframes quickly and present it to stakeholders. - Reusable components and sharing is easy

- Easy to Use - Key features like designing for different break points, Usability Testing, export screens as PNG , Downloading as HTML

Crashes very frequently Customization of components like textbox, dropdown is not possible. Software becomes slow once the files get heavy

Using this program for class made prototyping highly streamlined, and allowed us to jump directly into building something without having too much to worry about learning toolsets. Sharing files made collaboration relatively easy.

I like how it allows you to re-use work that you've already done, instead of having to rebuild menus that would normally be re-used throughout anyway.

Often times, it's difficult to see when something has gone wrong, and fixing something that has gone wrong - Once you have a number of layers going together, on top of one another, and something isn't working the correct way, it's almost impossible to get looking the way you want it to without rebuilding the entire scene. And if something is going wrong in a bit that you're re-using across the entire app, that behavior may not be consistent throughout the build.

-Was able to significantly impact our project for the better and make it come to life with the prototype design

I liked how it was easy to use and the interface was very simple. It integrated common features of an iPhone and was easy to use for other people when interacting with our prototype for the first time. Indigo Design helped our prototype to appear professional and realistic and really helped our project to come to life. The ease of use with integrating outside images was also extremely helpful to our design strategies.

There's no option for a cloud based sharing component of Indigo. We were working as a team so it would have been easier if two people could collaborate on the design at one time. It was a bit hard to overcome that obstacle but overall we were able to make it work.

The desktop version of the indigo studio has advantages over all the competitors with building and designing interactive prototypes. unfortunately, it's not supported any more in IOS so it lost the most important advantage.

In complicated prototypes, there is a performance issue

Being able to create professional-looking works

I like its versatility and ease of use the most. Even as a complete beginner, when I first the product, it was very accessible and provided many options that helped me polish my work to make it look professional.

I can't quite think of any cons at the moment. I do wish some there was some sort of way that could make transitioning easier to maneuver

Quick prototyping & testing

I really appreciate that I can put together a semi-functional screen quickly to communicate my ideas with others

Limited functionality - there's some things that I wish I was able to do and get frustrated when I can't

Ease of use. Extremely ease to design and setup interactions. Testing is a breeze!

The ability to bring Balsamiq work into Indigo is a huge plus. Also the ability to have features and animation abilities that are very easy to configure. The training videos are a GREAT!

The only downside is I found it difficult to copy an element without making a screen part. Could be my lack of experience.

Time saving as well as well as ease of use. App builder allows myself as a developer to set up a base project with use of better components

Ease of use, drag and dropping components is really great and very easy to use

Styling could be a bit better, inline styling and dragging a component below another

The speed and ease at which you can produce a rapid prototype is great. It gives you a way to share ideas and concepts without taking the time needed to code the entire project.

I wish it was more tightly integrated into a production environment to help expedite the creation process as well.

Early design of apps. Project got shelved in the meantime due to other business opportunities, but minimal costs.

Easy to build a realistic version of the proposed software and then demonstrate its features. Can also use to test ideas and alternative views/implementations. Most importantly things like buttons etc can take you to other views/screens/pages - so can get the real flow of an application.

When I last used it could not do different states on the same page so be able to hide/show different controls/portions of the page.

I like the rather intuitive and simple manner of the layout. While many capabilities are available, the software does not press or require one to use them all unless they want to.

So far, I haven't found a least liked feature. But if I had to pick one, is that as the domain expands and everyone is scrambling to follow their own standards and customizations of UX design/workflow, there is the rub - investing in proprietary software.

It's easy to use, you can create nice designs and you can even import it into an Angular project. Everything is quite straight-forward and you feel you know what you are doing and that you are in control.

The import feature is a bit lacking. It was quite annoying to get the routing part working correctly and I don't like the fact that each css file for each page contain basically the same elements as the other css files from other imported pages. This could cause a quite big load on the network traffic.

I like that through the workshop I was able to use this for free, will try to use in free time

i do not need too much instructions but intro was very helpful. I like that the layout is easy to understand. I enjoy figuring things out myself so this is great to work on. I also like that help is available if needed. I like variety of options and views of prototypes as well. Very easy to share work with others.

none. I downloaded this to participate in a workshop and while the workshop was not great this program was easy to learn if I spent more time on it.

We are doing some designs in it and we will be using it the rest of this year because we've invested the monmey. However when extra functionality for responsive designs will not be added in future updates we will look for another product by the end of this year.

- very easy to use - good online video's/training available - design interactions are easily added

- it "kills" itself sometimes somehow - poor functionality/elements for designing/prototyping for responsive designs - No screenparts for responsive design (cost a lot of extra prototyping time)

It is always good to be familiar with several design tools when it comes to prototyping and wireframing. I like learning it more and attending some webinars to deepen my knowledge.

It is user-friendly and sounds a great alternative for prototyping. The customer service is very good too.

The loading process is not fast enough, that makes designer wait a little bit more than usual compared to other existing design tools in the market. The updating process and UI can be improved too.

I was able to learn rapid prototyping as a student without paying for a product I couldn't afford or losing my project after a short (7-30 day) free trial. It speaks well of Infragistics that you support learning.

It's very intuitive and user-friendly. Also, it's great that Infragistics makes their products available for students free of charge for one year.

I haven't found anything I don't like yet, though I have only used it for wireframing so I can't speak to all of the features.

The software is easy to use and the controls are very nice and useful. The customisation options are enough for nice mock-ups. The copy paste and the duplicate options and screen parts are amazing.

The controls library is basic. I miss controls like scheduling and charts and plots. It will be great to have animations in the controls

the product is simple enough that you can learn essentials quite fast and start working right away, the UI is clean and easy to use

lack of learning material, small comminity. Working with stylesheets and project structure in general is bit baffling