- The ability to ensure we are following our standards; - Highlight duplicated code - See the progress of fixing the issues

- Not being able to export code patterns

Excellent, a great product with great support. We use this as part of a Whole Ecosystem view. It would be great if there was integrations with Vanta and Jupiter One to close the security and quality loop, however I proposed this and it the response was positive.

- Excellent Support and Customer Service- Easy to Use- Quick to Set Up- Educates Developers and keeps the code reviews functional.- Frees up Senior Resources to add value instead of arguing about casing and low level standards

The On Prem Version had a number of issues on Azure, however the SaaS version doesn't suffer from these stability issues and is very performant

Code Quality is hard to maintain with ever-increasing team sizes, so we're attempting to use Codacy to scan our code, find issues, and tag them before they get merged into the repository. So far the in-line explanations with the issues that Codacy has tagged have been well received and developers like the context these provide. We need to do some significant tuning to adjust the Signal To Noise ratio, but it's growing more useful daily.

The ability to customize patterns and see grades for Projects and individual files are key to this software. It's a great alternative to Code Climate. It has an on-prem solution that was a requirement for our team, and thus far it has been well received and well reviewed by our teams.

The enterprise (on-prem) solution is expensive (2.5x more expensive than the hosted license per seat). Additionally the support team is very slow to respond, often responding more than 24 hours later and missing questions in the original email. They're friendly and helpful if you can get them on a video conference, but the email support leaves much to be desired.

pretty seamless

Just takes a few mins to set up, and you start getting reports on a wide variety of languages. Leaves comments on PR's for you

some more control over the rules in the java set would be nice.

- Code review and checkup - Continuous evaluation and grading of your work

Session expires if you do not login on routine checkups

Great and intuitive User Interface. Big saving time. Possibility to define issue-based goals to improve the Codebase. Checking lots of security issues. Easy Setup and Customization.

There is no hotspots or quick wins. Incomplete documentation in some parts. It's impossible to prioritize the issues.

Most of the projects and code we write is in Jupyter notebook. Thus we have to add python code seperately so as to get evaluated.

It is better when you work overnight and make a coding development on which you are proud of. There comes codacy where you can rate the quality of your code. Real time updates makes it more fit.

Pricing is quite high and codacy disconnects your repository when not in use.

Absolute Master in Automated Code Reviews. Instead of having to manually check for code style, best practices, code security, common errors etc. Codacy detects those automatically for you. The most important informations being the impact in code quality of the recent commits and pull requests.