Camunda

RATING:

4.6

(12)

About Camunda

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation.

Camunda Pricing

https://camunda.com/pricing/

Starting price: 

$99.00 per month

Free trial: 

Available

Free version: 

Available

Camunda Optimize supports continuous process and decision table improvement by providing transparency into your automated workflows and decisions. Business-friendly reports and dashboards as well as alerts help you to identify process bottlenecks.

Camunda Reviews

Overall Rating

4.6

Ratings Breakdown

Secondary Ratings

Ease-of-use

4.5

Customer Support

4

Value for money

4.5

Functionality

5

Most Helpful Reviews for Camunda

1 - 5 of 12 Reviews

User Profile

Jose

Verified reviewer

Computer Software, 1,001-5,000 employees

Used weekly for more than 2 years

Review Source: Capterra
This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

OVERALL RATING:

5

EASE OF USE

5

VALUE FOR MONEY

5

FUNCTIONALITY

5

Reviewed December 2022

Camunda, an excellent solution for business automation, standardization and process improvement.

Camunda is an exceptional tool, its modeler is excellent and allows you to radically reduce development and implementation times. Camunda's workflow engine executes the processes that are designed in standards such as BPMN, which is considered the most widely used standard for process modeling for business and process systems.

PROS

One of the biggest advantages of Camunda is its flexible framework, specially designed for the automation of workflows and decisions through standards such as BPMN and DMN, widely known by process analysts, in addition to its infinite capacity to create integration with other applications in the market. Additionally, it has a set of easy-to-implement tools to apply own or third-party task lists, with programmatic control of the life cycle and generation of traceability in the process.

CONS

Its learning curve is fast, there is a large amount of documentation on the market that allows us to speed up the implementation process, in addition to the fact that there are developments available that can be taken as an example or starting point for our parameterizations. On the other hand, it has been used a lot and is kept up to date, with a community that collaborates in improvements and in the generation of new integrations.

Reasons for switching to Camunda

Many more existing developments around Camunda, and the ability to perform more integrations with applications currently deployed in the organization.

Anonymous

5,001-10,000 employees

Used weekly for more than 2 years

Review Source: Capterra
This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

OVERALL RATING:

5

EASE OF USE

5

VALUE FOR MONEY

4

CUSTOMER SUPPORT

4

FUNCTIONALITY

5

Reviewed January 2023

Camunda - easier way to manage your workflow with underlying system

I am fully satisfied after using this siftware. Any kind of workflow that you need to design to get connected from Northbound with south bound system through API integration its much easier

PROS

The graphical presentation, handling workflow during runtime and tracking it much simplistic way- you do not have to be a pro in this software, even novish can handle it

CONS

Might be UI part can be improved a little bit to make more user-friendly

Reasons for switching to Camunda

Camunda is user firendly and ease to handle. The UI is easy to learn as well.

User Profile

Gabriel

Verified reviewer

Outsourcing/Offshoring, 201-500 employees

Review Source: Capterra
This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

OVERALL RATING:

4

EASE OF USE

4

VALUE FOR MONEY

1

CUSTOMER SUPPORT

4

FUNCTIONALITY

5

Reviewed November 2023

Very expensive tool specifically built for JAVA ecosystems

We used the platform as a solid BPMN workflow automation tool, even though it can do a lot more. The business users were extremely hyped by the modeler tool (that allows them to simply build workflows by drag& dropping blocks & liking them together in a logical sequence). The Cockpit module (in version 7) and the Operate module (in version 8) were also extremely appreciated since they provided a nice insight into the actual execution of the workflow instances. However, setting up a Camunda 8 instance in the cloud was a painful process - In general, the platform is a resource hog, and we did not appreciate the way it enforces the use of keycloak and postgres. As a further downside, there is very little relevant documentation on how to deploy it in Azure - we had to do a lot of digging, so the whole setup process took about 180 man-hours. Once this was done, we managed to create a proof of concept in which to link workflow blocks to other applications, and to use the .net-connector plugin to write custom implementations for some of the blocks. However, in the end we had to drop the whole thing because the Operate module was only available under the licensed version - which meant a 50k USD/year fee.

PROS

- We loved the modeler, we also loved the fact that deploying the platform in a dev environment was extremely easy (docker based). - We also liked the cockpit module, that allows to easily track what happens to a workflow execution. - We liked that the platform sticks with the BPMN standard implementation. - We also liked that the platform is offered both for Self Hosting (e.g. in a K8 cluster) or as SaaS (within their own cloud platform)

CONS

- The cost was prohibitive for small to medium companies. They start with a flat rate of 50k USR/year, to which they add hosting costs when using the SaaS option. - In version 7, parallel jobs simply do not work. In version 8 they do, but in v8 the cockpit (operate) module is no longer available under the free license. - The whole platform is written in JAVA and this is also apparent in all integrations.

Anonymous

51-200 employees

Used monthly for more than 2 years

Review Source: Capterra
This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

OVERALL RATING:

5

EASE OF USE

3

VALUE FOR MONEY

5

CUSTOMER SUPPORT

3

FUNCTIONALITY

5

Reviewed February 2024

The Industry standard BPMN platform

Brilliant as an open source tool if your team has the expertise to tailor it to your use case.

PROS

The ability to design powerful workflows using BPMN that can scale for businesses of any size

CONS

The learning curve is significant even for seasoned business process automation specialists. Hiring Camunda experts is expensive!

Bogdan

Information Technology and Services, 2-10 employees

Used daily for more than 2 years

Review Source: Capterra

OVERALL RATING:

5

EASE OF USE

4

VALUE FOR MONEY

5

CUSTOMER SUPPORT

5

FUNCTIONALITY

5

Reviewed August 2016

best open source process engine

We've been developing full-fledged BPM applications on the camunda engine for the past two years and we are continuously excited by the frequent and consistent updates the camunda team provide to the engine every six months.

PROS

It's open source, it's fully compatible with the BPMN, DMN, CMMN standards (so its models could be interchanged with other standard-compatible tools), the dev & support teams are incredible, it's very lightweight and very fast (which means it scales extremely well) and it has a great REST API interface. Plus it has one of the best modelers out there, free of charge.

CONS

This engine is a developer-friendly engine, which means you hook the engine to your own software solution in order to create a complete business app. So while it is perfect for developers, it is not suited for regular business users who still believe in the low-code / no-code myth.