Sigrid
About Sigrid
Sigrid Pricing
Contact Software Improvement Group for pricing details
Free trial:
Not Available
Free version:
Not Available
Most Helpful Reviews for Sigrid
1 - 5 of 15 Reviews
Anonymous
201-500 employees
Used weekly for less than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed December 2023
Sigrid review
What I like most is that it's easy to use, the set-up wasn't too complex. It's intuitive and it has a lot of features. We use it both to identify vulnerabilities and for code quality, it's impressive for how many things it can scan the code for. For example, it found outdated packages with vulnerabilities and configurations with potential security risks. It also provides links with more information for each finding and ways to fix them.
CONSThere were a few cases where for some vulnerabilities it found a few places where they occurred, but didn't find all the places, so you have to be careful and check all the code.
Rob
Publishing, 5,001-10,000 employees
Used weekly for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
4
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed December 2023
Keeping a good eye on Open Source and Low Code software development efforts
Although getting pseude code for all low code diagrams from our Mendix app made me a bit skeptical in the beginning, I started to appreciate the overall features Sigrid provides and the ability to review both Open Source and Mendix low code apps. As I outlined in the cons, there should be more credit/focus in Mendix Low Code developed apps when as little Java as possible is used, benefitting fully from Low Code assesments. I personally don't appreciate when Java is seen as the way to go in Low Code software development.
PROSWe use Sigrid for the following objectives (in order of top prio first): - Monitor and avoid vulnerabilities in libraries we use - Assess and improve code & low code quality - Assess Software Architectures and avoid/minimize module entanglements - Benchmark our Open Source and Low Code developments - Focus on good enough development and not over engineer
CONS- In the Architecture Overview of your App, the Scores for Technology Stack give you 2.8 stars for all developments you do in Mendix Low Code (and we use Mendix QSM, the Mendix version of Sigrid) and 5.4 stars for any Java code you use in your Mendix app, this is crazy and should be solved. In a Mendix app you should expect the opposite, 2.8 stars if you use Java instead of the Low code way of developing. If this can be improved, Sigrid is a great tool.
Vendor Response
Dear Rob, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
Replied December 2023
Jesper
Political Organization, 51-200 employees
Used monthly for less than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
2
EASE OF USE
2
VALUE FOR MONEY
1
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
1
FUNCTIONALITY
1
Reviewed December 2023
Highly unsatisfying experience with code quality monitoring software
Some quality aspects are monitorable, even though not all the essential ones
CONSCustomizability of what is measured and how this works with architecture goals is very low. Immediate feedback for developers missing
Vendor Response
Dear Jesper, Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback regarding our platform. We genuinely appreciate your insights as they are crucial for our continuous improvement. Our team is constantly working to enhance our software's capabilities and ensure it aligns more closely with the diverse needs of different users. We are committed to delivering a product that not only meets but exceeds your expectations. If you're open to it, we would greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss your experience in more detail. This could help us understand your specific needs and preferences better, allowing us to address them more effectively in future updates. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/. Your continued satisfaction is our top priority, and we are here to support you. Thank you once again for your review. We look forward to the opportunity to improve your experience with our software.
Replied December 2023
Daniela
Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees
Used daily for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed January 2024
Staying ahead of threads and problems with ease of use
We have been using it for months now without any issue, we'll continue to use it and maybe reach out to improve and add new features.
PROSIt help us to evaluate and measure the entire scope of things when developing and maintaining or software and platforms. That's very helpful
CONSIt can be a bit overwhelming at first, but once you get to know it, you have an amazing tool
Theodosios
Banking, 5,001-10,000 employees
Used weekly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
4
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed November 2023
A useful tool with some room for improvement
Sigrid can help you improve the quality of your code. Beyond duplication, size and complexity issues that a developer can easily locate by himself, also issues concering the coupling and dependencies issues
CONSThere are issues concerning the specificity of each programming language or framework, i.e. sigrid appears duplication issues in HTML which a developer cannot avoid
Vendor Response
Dear Theodosios, Thanks for your useful feedback and for taking the time to write a review for Sigrid. We would love to learn more about your experience and how we can make it even better. Please feel free to reach out to us at https://www.softwareimprovementgroup.com/contact/ with any further comments, concerns, or suggestions you wish to share. We are always here to help and are looking forward to making your experience even more positive!
Replied December 2023