CA Service Desk Manager
About CA Service Desk Manager
CA Service Desk Manager Pricing
Free trial:
Not Available
Free version:
Not Available
Most Helpful Reviews for CA Service Desk Manager
1 - 5 of 13 Reviews
Ravi
Verified reviewer
Banking, 10,000+ employees
Used daily for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
4
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed November 2020
Best ITIL management software
Moved to CA from Remedy, extremely lightweight, thin client, covers all aspects of ITIL incident management, change management, problem management with the functionality to generate MI reports and main knowledge bases for various level of support teams in the organisation. The ability to flag tickets and trigger notifications to escalation points based on various levels of SLA breach. Easy to transfer tickets within teams, with inline editing to edit multiple tickets at once makes it easier for the batters to manage queues.
CONSAuto scheduling of reports and visualisation should be added for better representation of data such as graphs and charts.
Anonymous
51-200 employees
Used daily for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
3
VALUE FOR MONEY
3
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5
FUNCTIONALITY
3
Reviewed August 2018
Big and powerful software suite, capable of solving all your ITSM needs, with huge complexity
We were able to implement ITIL and ISO 27K compliant processes. It was very simple to assign very specific access privileges to different users. We accomplished a robust and fully functional integration of our monitoring alerts for ticket creation. Business rules have reduced a lot of human errors and minimized non-compliant execution of our processes.
PROSThe suite can provide anything we need regarding our ITSM needs. We can implement business rules, custom fields, automated validations, workflows, processes, etc. There's basically no limit, no ITSM business need we can't somehow do. No ITIL process we can't implement and certify. The management and agent GUI is consistent, once you understand how things are organized, you can easily navigate and find whatever option you need. Role based access control provides maximum granularity to satisfy the needs of the most strict security policies. CA's technical support is among the quickest and most capable support teams I've ever been served by.
CONSThere are too many software products in the suite, all of them needed to have a fully functional and compliant service desk. From the desk itself, to process automation, business reports, service catalog, self service GUI, access control management. These products have been created along a very long timeframe, which translates on very different software development fundamentals. While Service Desk is a rather old piece of software which relies on obsolete technologies la .NET 2.0 and the Java plug-in, service catalog and self service portal are more modern pieces of software. The APIs are not as robust as expected, or as seen in disruptive competition, a very limited REST api and a very complex SOAP webservice make it a big challenge to build robust integrations. CA support has confirmed there are no plans for building from scratch a new, modern version of Service Desk.
Joel
Banking, 5,001-10,000 employees
Used daily for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
1
EASE OF USE
1
VALUE FOR MONEY
1
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
1
FUNCTIONALITY
1
Reviewed August 2019
Sounds Great on Paper... Start using it and you'll hate it.
From a UI perspective the software is a train wreck. Most of our service agents hate it. From a Development stand point, you will spend a lot of time just chasing your tail trying to figure out why something isn't working only to find out that there is a known bug within the software that is preventing you from doing what you intended to do. The communities are helpful and most of the folks there are very nice. They seem to have the sense of "we feel your pain too" mentality. Overall the quality of this software and the overall architecture is a train wreck. This was supposedly a cheaper alternative to some of the competition but the down side is we wasted millions trying to make this thing work when in reality it never would. Its a broken smoldering pile. STEER CLEAR!
PROSThe concept and what it was attempting to do is brilliant. If it actually worked it would have transformed the entire agencies IT structure.
CONSIt didn't work. It was full of bugs and it seemed like we were basically paying to test out their software. The CA / Broadcom QA team is non-existent. At the time of writing this review their Process Automation piece of the suite is inherently flawed to the point that it has broken all integration with the rest of the software.
Saumendra
Information Technology and Services, 10,000+ employees
Used daily for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed October 2022
A highly mature product with all Industry leading features
Life is supper cool as all the compliance and industry standard practices are taken care by core of the application framework !!
PROSIts based on ITIL and other Industry leading framework so one can use it relaxing about audits, Packed with many automation and self-service features to make the day to day support supper easy.Easy Integration with different data source , directory services and other eco system is the beauty of the product .Reporting and Knowledge management feature makes it the most appealing product among its competitors.
CONSA bit resource heavy on server side.
Alex
Medical Practice, 10,000+ employees
Used daily for less than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
4
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed July 2018
Decent Ticketing System
Not bad, if you have only one team with consistent needs using the software. Once you need to customize it, you feel its limitations.
PROSWas our previous ticketing software for our Contact Center before moving to ServiceNow. Able to capture category, subcategory, comments, affected end-user, and much more. Can also report out of CA to track rep performance, call trends, etc.
CONSNot nearly as customizable as ServiceNow, and its reporting functionality isn't as robust, either. Our Supply Chain Contact Center shared CA with our IT Contact Center, and, since it had such limited customization options, we had a number of challenges making one piece of software work for both teams. We've removed that problem with ServiceNow