About Testsigma

Testsigma is a unified, cloud-based test automation platform for Agile teams. It enables you to write automated tests in plain English, for web and mobile apps, and APIs. Users can also conduct parallelize tests by browsers and devices with an integrated Test Lab. It also helps continuously eliminate flakiness and reduce test suite maintenance costs through an AI.


Read More

Supported Operating System(s):

13 Reviews of Testsigma

Average User Ratings

Overall

4.38 / 5 stars

Ease-of-use

4.5

Value for money

4.5

Customer support

4.5

Functionality

4.5

Ratings Snapshot

5 stars

(6)

6

4 stars

(6)

6

3 stars

(1)

1

2 stars

(0)

0

1 stars

(0)

0

Likelihood to Recommend

Not likely

Very likely

Showing 1 - 5 of 13 results

June 2021

John from Sage People

Verified Reviewer

Company Size: 10,000+ employees

Industry: Computer Software

Time Used: Less than 12 months

Review Source: Capterra


Ease-of-use

4.0

Value for money

4.0

Customer support

5.0

Functionality

4.0

June 2021

Test Sigma

We had no tool to automate our Salesforce Lightning backend and Test Sigma fit the bill well as it was able to cope with changing element ID's. Their Support is outstanding and their delivery model rapid insofar as we are quite envious of them as a SaaS provider(we are too but not as efficient as them). They were able to diagnose and deliver fixes within a few hours of them being reported as well as providing the team with great support on complex issues, resolving those rapidly or coming up with workaround whilst they figured out a better solution. They listened and acted on our feedback delivering minor but requested features within a week or so of our request for them.

Pros

Relatively easy to pick up by non-technical QA with a few hours spent on workshops with Test Sigma to educate on the basic usage. Record and playback lets you get a base setup quickly. Custom methods support extension of test cases by allowing us to write our own code for complex scenarios. Fast, fresh GUI that was pretty intuitive. Support scheduled jobs and Jenkins integration. Support team are outstanding. We even got interviewed to give feedback on Pro's and Con's and felt we had influence over the Roadmap so as to get our needs met.

Cons

Test Case hierarchy and ability to group the numerous Test Cases and Test Steps began to be a challenge as this was not the best executed part of the product. Sometimes it was hard to get consistency in our Test Cases, some due to the product not being able to accurately identify an element and some due to our own complex DOM. These issues were often resolved very promptly.

March 2019

Amit from LendingClub Inc

Verified Reviewer

Company Size: 1,001-5,000 employees

Industry: Financial Services

Time Used: Less than 12 months

Review Source: Capterra


Ease-of-use

5.0

Value for money

5.0

Customer support

5.0

Functionality

4.0

March 2019

A complete and easy to use web based Test Automation Platform for teams of all size

I have been using TestSigma for my teams at various organizations in Silicon Valley to implement agile testing successfully where everyone on my product team can develop automated test irrespective of their skill set which allows me to deliver software products faster with quality. This tool is so easy to learn and full of features that allow me the practice of precision testing where testing has to be better, cheaper and faster.

Pros

1. Completely web-based with very intuitive interface 2. Work out of the box 3. End to End Test Management with powerful reporting and assignment 4. Programming language agnostic for the most part, very helpful for a team with expertise in the different programming language or no programming language 5. Allows to use the knowledge of Selenium WebDriver 6. Integration with Slack/Email Notification/Jenkins/Browser Stack/Sauce Lab/Jira 7. Rapid automated test development for web applications, rest services and even mobile apps for agile testing 8. Script-less automation using Chrome plugin 9. Powerful element locators with built-in intelligence to write more stable tests 10. Support for organizing and running tests against various prod and non-prod environments alike 11. Awesome customer service 12. Flexibility to build custom functions in Java for very complex scenarios 13. Built-In scheduling of Test Runs 14. Very cheap given the productivity gain 15. Great support for building cross-browser tests quickly 16. Allows to use of existing Selenium Grid, Browser Stack and even run on a local machine 17. Automated detection of impacted tests for a failed step and skip them in a test run to save execution time

Cons

1. Lack of support for DB testing but possible with custom function 2. Reports could be clearer 3. Lack of full-page screenshot in some browsers but possible with custom function 4. Lack of feature to compare 2 screenshots/images for better cross browser testing

May 2021

Enasoae from Vast Visibility

Company Size: 11-50 employees

Industry: Insurance

Time Used: Less than 2 years

Review Source: Capterra


Ease-of-use

3.0

Customer support

4.0

Functionality

3.0

May 2021

Good potential

- good for automating repetitive tests (smoke&sanity tests) - good for automating processes that does not require too much configuration or dynamism

Pros

- great NLP features - good project management - responsive customer suport

Cons

- hard to write code & not recommended for automation oriented testers

May 2021

Sondra from Dozuki

Company Size: 51-200 employees

Industry: Computer Software

Time Used: More than 2 years

Review Source: Capterra


Ease-of-use

5.0

Value for money

5.0

Customer support

4.0

Functionality

5.0

May 2021

Ease of use, configurability, and flexibility

Overall, I really like the service. I particularly love that is does not require an engineer to get something done!!

Pros

* Low barrier to entry! I'm not an engineer and didn't want to waste time learning a programming language to get our Part 11 Validation testing framework up and running. I have been able to make hundreds of tests which are specific to user acceptance criteria yet flexible enough to handle being general build-acceptance testing. * Instead of buying different devices or workstations with dozens of permutations, I can choose from nearly all of the currently and previously available browser/OS combinations. * The screenshot capability as well as the video generated by each test has made writing up reports easier.

Cons

* The reporting is not at all flexible. I had to use Grafana to create a custom dashboard of the results so that my team could see at-a-glance how all the test suites which ran overnight did. In addition, I have to do a heck of a lot of massaging to get reports which an be used for the Part 11 report. I've repeatedly asked for the ability to customize the dashboard, but it's not a priority for their product team. * Do not expect automated UI testing to be fast. * Inability to link test suites so that when one ends, the next is kicked off. There is a workaround for this, but it requires multiple parallel user accounts. * Plan ahead when naming your tests. The organization capacity is a little lacking, so I had to use the naming conventions to ensure I have included all the tests in the correct set in the correct order.

Reasons for Choosing Testsigma

No coding knowledge required. It ticked all the other boxes we had but that was the coup de grace

July 2021

Preethi from Freshworks

Company Size: 1,001-5,000 employees

Industry: Information Technology and Services

Time Used: Less than 12 months

Review Source: Capterra


Ease-of-use

5.0

Customer support

5.0

Functionality

5.0

July 2021

Mobile Test automation simplified

With TestSigma, we were able to build test cases faster in Agile way of development. Their support team was always approachable and supported in all our clarifications.

Pros

-> Easy to set up the tool -> Creation of test scripts is very simple since its scriptless using NLP commands -> In-built integration with Jenkins helped us to setup CI/CD easily -> Ability to re-use test cases when grouped as step groups saves time and avoids redundancy -> Very user friendly to build test script since tool provides samples and examples for each test case -> In Test runs, for the failed cases, along with the error tool helps us with possible reasons for the occurrence of the issue, which helps us to debug the issue.

Cons

-> Custom functions provided sometimes didn’t work for specific use-cases, which were resolved soon. -> Lack of a tight integration with Jenkins for test reports. -> Lack of support for few testing scenarios outside the app context