It was important for us to have visibility into who is getting stuck in their workflows. This, combined with productivity metrics like code churn, provided us with insights we had no idea we needed. The fully featured nature of Hatica is what drew us to the platform.

Nothing for now. Will update my review if I come across any cons.

I really believe in the comprehensive engineering management approach of the SPACE framework. I couldn’t find a tool that put the framework in practice, especially combining developers’ digital well-being and experience and productivity metrics. But I discovered Hatica and after using the platform and speaking with the founders about their approach to dev management, I am convinced that Hatica is the best tool to manage engineering productivity.

There are so many metrics that you’re able to measure - it can get overwhelming at first.

We’re a globally distributed team that uses Hatica’s stand-ups daily. We have been able to respect our global team’s time zones and allow people to work without interruptions by giving them the flexibility to provide their check-in at their convenience.

The product is still new and I’m waiting to see it develop.

So far having a great experience with Hatica. Really liking the DORA metrics and the maker time dashboard which are useful to measure my team’s meeting load and also identify whether they have enough time to concentrate on serious projects.

Platform doesn't have support to customise dashboards.

We’ve been using Hatica for our team’s performance metrics. Their reports feature makes our team management more proactive - We are able to identify and deal with issues as they occur rather than addressing the problems after they occur and this has helped our team to deliver results without delays.

The platform is still new, so there are some potential avenues for improvement which I believe they’re working on. I’m excited about the new features that are in the pipeline.