I needed a highly performant, multi series, multi-axis chart. THis ticked all the boxed (particularly the performance).

Very easy to use, fairly intuitive once you get used to the API

the documentation is very much "dissect this example". It could be better.

My main reason for buying was that I wanted documentation and debugging facilities for .NET Code behind the Nevron Vision for SSRS components I develop for my customer. I did not use it for commercial application development yet, but plan future use in some tools for the financial industry, independent of SSRS. So I am especially experienced in charts and their customization via C# code behind, but not that much experienced yet in other parts of the framework.

Nevron Vision and its (so to say) derivatives, the charting and graphics components for SQL Server Reporting Services and Sharepoint offer a complete and easy to learn way of data visualization. I learned about the product by developing charts in reports for a customer; I got excellent support (even including code development) in my first attempts to implement data visualization as designed by a PR agency. The product and the excellent after sales support helped me to provide a solution to my customer's highest satisfaction - and so am I highly satisfied.

When searching for particular solutions and code fragments I find it sometimes difficult to use the forums, because the search function is not very sophisticated. As a suggestion: it should not provide multiple results from a single conversation/thread. It would provide a much faster overview of various threads' relevance to a particular problem, if I could gather a quick overview of threads with a certain question rather than seeing all posts which hit my search.

My overall experience with nevron vision for .Net is easy to use and help to make custom ux easily and save much much much time. i used trail version so i uninstalled but still i miss this software.

I Like UI's which are great Simple Toolbox Simple Use just drug and make a code

Out of memory if high end code is written (32-Bit and @2GB RAM) UX Loading time was increase if bulky code is present

We have been using Nevron Chart for several years now for (high volume) process data visualisation and for online data visualisation with various chart types (point, line, bar ...). Even large data sets are hadled in a fast and reliable way.

We were looking for a fast charting component which was able to handle large data sets and also offers several chart types for display. With Nevron chart, we found a solution which can handle all data visualization scenarios needed and furthermore offers many interactivity features (zooming, markers, data point highlighting ...). Especially the support by the Nevron team is outstanding - even for rather specific requests for data visualisation from our side a solution was found in a short time.

Since Nevron chart offers a lot of functionality and features, the programming model is rather complex and needs some getting used to. But since it comes with an excelent Demo Solution, usually the basic principles for the desired type of chart can be found quite swiftly.

We first moved to Nevron for it's flexible and beautiful plot renderings. Over time we've come to appreciate how much more we can do with it.

Sometimes it's hard to find a needed functionality. But the support has resolved this quickly.

Although I have been programming for 40+ years, I still consider myself a “novice” programmer. I am an engineer and researcher and primarily use programming for computations and charting for helping users visualize results. My programming activity varies widely; I will go a year or more with absolutely no programming, then end up working on a small project or two. That is where I am now. My immediate need was to generate a 3D surface image, primarily to check some geometric computations that I was doing. I downloaded NEVRON Chart after trying a competitor (.netChart). .netChart offered some attractive licensing options for me as an academic. But, I was not able to successfully implement their product, probably because of my lack of programming knowledge. So, I gave up after a few hours of trying. In contrast, I was able to generate my triangulated surface chart within an hour (probably closer to 20 minutes, but I wasn’t keeping time) with NEVRON Charts. I found a step-by-step example and just followed it. It solved my immediate need quickly and efficiently.

I would have to say that it was the examples that I liked most. I have done a lot of programming, but it has been a while and I am certainly not a "professional programmer." Instead, I am a "professional" who utilizes programming. Compared to other charting options, the examples provided where more clear and easy to follow.

I have not run into any major issues yet. There was some confusion in the purchasing process, but that was quickly clarified.

Pros: Easy to implement , if you think about the cost firts , you have evaluate how much you would cost to developed it.

Cons: In some features the aparience it looks like there are more simple graphics

Used Nevron for development of 2D and 3D charts inside our windows form application

It was intuitive and developed the charts that I needed fast.

All the licensing keys needed to run the in development mode and production mode

I liked the aesthetic aspects of your library and the fact that I could try it out as open source first. Also, when I contacted customer service I received excellent support.

I really have no complaints. The software was as advertised. Maybe you could create some content about creating widgets in PowerBI? I guess that would be useful for me.

flexibility and configuration of the various options

I remember that my IT colleagues had some issues in the installation on our corporate servers which were then resolved positively, but I have nothing else to report

Several business problems solved using this software. Has saved months of work if we didn't have it.

Superb customer support. Intuitive way of constructing charts. Wide range of different chart types available which are highly configurable

Installing into Visual Studio 2017 was not straightforward as it needs manually adding to the WPF Toolbox

Convert 2D to 3D

Component is very complete, many options. Display is very fast

Not enough examples, comments required in code

Software applications should always push the developer to explore. This software helps open up the creativity and innovation within us

Documentation keeping up with releases I understand the challenges.