Mode
About Mode
Awards and Recognition
Mode Pricing
Mode offers a free Studio plan with basic features, as well as Business and Enterprise plans. Contact Mode Analytics for more information on pricing.
Free trial:
Available
Free version:
Available
Most Helpful Reviews for Mode
1 - 5 of 88 Reviews
Rohan
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad, 501 - 1,000 employees
Used less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
Reviewed April 2023
Internship Experience: Smooth and Exciting
Gaurav
Verified reviewer
Market Research, 1,001-5,000 employees
Used weekly for less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed February 2023
Good tool for attribution modelling.
Overall experience is postive but the can be made little more simple
PROSBest way to track independent teams performanceHas multiple functions and features and can be used by multiple people from different teams at the same time.
CONSIs expensive to use and gives error when queries are run multiple timesTracking can be some times buggy if some other team implements something from engineering endsRequires very proper data science modellingIntial Definitions are sometimes tough to understand, so most of the data is to be added to confluence
Reasons for switching to Mode
More features and multiple login features
Anonymous
51-200 employees
Used daily for less than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
3
VALUE FOR MONEY
4
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed December 2019
White Label Imbeds fit perfectly into our software.
Overall, it has changed our company. Internally, our teams have data pushed to them daily or weekly. Our end users have significantly more dynamic systems. And overall, our analytics stack has a very predictable cost structure. We love Mode!
PROSWe love Mode's ability to push analytics into Slack for internal analytics. We also heavily use Mode's White Label Embed capability into our website. We are able to configure Mode's look and feel to be perfectly on-brand. Mode's analytics plug perfectly into our site.
CONSMode's Grid and Pivot grids still have a long way to go. We end up plugging DevExtreme into Mode - which accomplishes exactly what we need... but it's a lot of work. It would have been nice to have beautiful pivot grids and data grids out-of-the-box. Mode also needs the ability to have triggers (only send this report if X>Y). Right now, Mode can only send on a schedule... but many of our needs are warning systems (if X<=0 then send an alert to this team).
Reason for choosing Mode
First, our engineering team vetoed all vendors requiring a Microsoft server. We were looking for excellent pivot grid capabilities - which none of the vendors provided. They were all competing for the best bar charts. However, a company called DevExtreme has a wonderful Javascript plugin PivotGrid - and Mode plays nicely with javascript plugins. So it's really that Mode played nicely with our technology stack + Mode played nicely with DevExtreme's Pivot Grid capabilities + Mode's White Label Embed Licensing fit into our business model and our team has SQL and Python skills - so Mode didn't require retraining. They just fit.
Reasons for switching to Mode
We chose Mode for their White Label Embed functionality. Mode offered a more modern and customizable user experience and Mode's licensing mode fit our business model better than Tableau. Tableau was getting too expensive.
Laural
Insurance, 201-500 employees
Used daily for less than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
3
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
3
FUNCTIONALITY
3
Reviewed December 2019
experience as a user
Overall mode helps me perform my daily duties with efficiency however the glitches and slow running can cause downtime
PROSrelatively easy to use to run a report and export the report
CONSthe glitches, the freezing, the delay in running the report sometimes so I have to refresh it
Alexander
Research, 51-200 employees
Used weekly for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
3
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4
FUNCTIONALITY
3
Reviewed December 2019
Great for sharing data
Mode has improved a LOT since we first began using it in the spring of 2019. The notebook interface is much faster and more stable (it could still be snappier and closer to 'native', but it's much much better), and the plotting abilities are much more flexible and nice to look at. Big props to the mode team for integrating so many useful features and improvements!
PROSMode has made it much faster to write + share small dashboards for internal consumption. My team gets a lot of random last-minute inbound requests for analytics regarding different parts of our research program, and Mode really makes it easy to make that data available and re-generable for the leadership teams who make those requests.
CONSSome analytics, like almost-automatic chart and table generation using SQL queries, are streamlined in a way I find confusing and hard to use. I find that I have to structure my SQL query in such a way that data comes out just right for mode to display/plot the way I want. SQL is designed for database manipulation and is not great for manipulating data. If the purpose of directly plotting SQL results is to bypass the python notebook toolchain, it would be nice if there were slightly more configuration tools for data resulting from SQL to help customize plots/chart display. I would also like the ability to share charts that automatically run on a set time schedule; I find that I frequently share dashboards with supervisors who are perhaps less tech savvy and who inadvertently look at outdated runs of notebooks. Mode *does* indicate that notebook runs are outdated, but it would be nice to be able to push this a step further and have a static link to a dashboard/notebook that re-runs automatically every 30 minutes in the background.