All Scribus Reviews
1-17 of 17 Reviews
Sort by
Md Fateh Ali
Verified reviewer
Design, 11-50 employees
Used weekly for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
4
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed June 2022
The best open source alternative of Adobe InDesign
It's a great tool to create books and magazine designs. It allows me to import a large number of pages and work on them easily. As open-source software, it works wonderfully, but if you need advanced and professional work, you consider others. I will recommend others to try it before you buy adobe InDesign or Affinity Publisher. I hope you will love this.
PROSScribus is one of the best desktop publishing software in the publishing and print media and it's totally free to everyone. The user interface of this software is pretty cool and very lightweight. It supports multi-cross platforms like windows, Linux, and macOS. So, you can install this software on multiple computers. It has many professional features, such as CYMK support, image packaging, and a wonderful PDF export feature, highly valued by professional printing services.
CONSOne of the big issues of Scribus is its open-source software. So it didn't get updated regularly. In contrast to Adobe InDesign, Scribus lacks advanced features and functionality.
Reason for choosing Scribus
Pricing is the main issue. It works really well for beginner and basic projects.
James
Libraries, 2-10 employees
Used monthly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
3
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed October 2023
Scribus - Great open-source tool for preparing small to medium sized publications.
I actually use Inkscape for graphics layout work for posters and flyers. When the project requires multi page layouts and more complex text handling Scribus has fit our needs well. I spent 12 years as a part-time technology teacher in a small private school. We used scribus each year to design and then publish the school's yearbook, so it can handle quite complex tasks. In my current position I handle most of the graphics design and publishing tasks for our small public library. I work from both home and onsite so the flexible licensing is very important to me. Our budget can't match those of larger libraries so the cost savings of using open-source helps us direct finances to more important needs at the library.
PROSThe open source licensing allows us to use this on each of our staff computers for free, plus it can be installed on laptops or home computers for the staff to use outside of the office. It is powerful and flexible enough to do the simple brochures and booklets that we need here at the library. It also gives me a higher confidence that years down the road the files will still be useable and the software still available. I can't say the same for some older archive files we have that were created in proprietary software that either no longer exists or is prohibitively expensive.
CONSThe features we need are present, but the user interface can still be a little bit rough compared to low to mid-range commercial Desktop Publishing software. Some of the staff are still most comfortable using Microsoft Publisher for their tasks.
Reason for choosing Scribus
For the same reason that we switched from primarily using Microsoft Publisher. Scribus offers an open xml format that should be readable in the long-term future. The open-source licensing cuts down on our technology budget allowing us to allocate the money to more important needs for the library.
Reasons for switching to Scribus
More flexible licensing so we can install on all our computers at no cost. Scribus uses a non-proprietary xml file format so text content can be recovered even if Scribus becomes unavailable or unusable in the future.
Debbie
Marketing and Advertising, 1 employee
Used weekly for less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
1
EASE OF USE
3
VALUE FOR MONEY
1
FUNCTIONALITY
1
Reviewed February 2024
Too many bugs. Unusable.
This product used to be decent. Now it's unusable and I paid for this. Terrible.
PROSNone. I used to use Scribus, now it's unusable with text flow bugs.
CONSType won't flow properly in a text frame. Words are separated with no logic or properly placed hyphen when a sentence comes to the end of a text frame. I've spent way too much time researching and trying to "fix" this. The work around is to force a return where you want the sentence to break. It's basically unusable. This is NOT the free trial, I have paid for this. I'm finding other people are having this issue. I have since read that it won't work on a Mac M1. That information should have been listed prior to me paying for this. I'll have to go back to paying $$$$ for InDesign. At least I know that'll work!
Jeremy
Professional Training & Coaching, 1 employee
Used monthly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
3
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed October 2022
Great Tool for Open-Source Design
Scribus allows me to select and convert colors in bulk, which saves a ton of time in my workflow. It is moderately easy to use, and I have found myself using this program to make other quick changes to content as well.
CONSThis software has crashed on me a few times, and I have experienced other glitches as well. These issues are not frequent, but I have experienced them occasionally.
Nick
Publishing, 1 employee
Used weekly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
4
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed October 2023
Have been happy using the 1.5 branch for years
Scribus, and especially using the Python API, is enabling me to create publishing-quality puzzle images and puzzle books (though I still have some work to do on that) very efficiently and consistently.There are definitely hurdles to overcome using the API, but in the end it is that API that is enabling me to scale my puzzle creation business in a way that would not be viable using any interactive desktop publishing GUI simply because of the time it takes doing stuff with mouse clicks and manual fiddling.
PROSCurrently using Scribus 1.5.8 (in Ubuntu), it supports everything I need to create high quality Begriddled puzzle books, as PDFs suitable for KDP and Ingramspark, etc, and publishing quality PNG and JPEG puzzle images (that include text) that can be included as-is in magazines,etc, or used on products.Although currently 1.5 is considered the development branch, and 1.4 the stable one, the reality is that 1.5 is better than 1.4, is very stable, and suitable for production use (as I have been using it) for years.More recently I have started to use the python API to create documents (including books) programmatically rather than do it manually via the Scribus GUI. Although I found this not so easy at first, once I found decent 1.5 documentation (I use impagina.org/scribus-scripter-api) and got up to speed with it, it opened up a whole new dimension of automation possibilities. It is not perfect, but scripting in Python 3, I have so far always been able to work around limitations.
CONSThe Python API is not well documented and there are not many good script examples. Most examples you can find are outdated and simply don't work now because they use Python 2 instead of 3, or were created for Scribus 1.4.Some things that are straightforward in the GUI require some trickery to automate. Eg I found rotating an object around its centre, easy to do in the GUI, quite a challenge. But having got that working with the help of ChatGPT to develop an algorithm to do it using only the features provided by the API, I won't have to write that function again.Some issues have to be worked around. The only way I found to make some changes "stick" and be properly visible in the GUI was to save and re-open the document. This is straightforward in the API, but it took me some time to discover this worked as a workaround.But the good thing is that once you've solved an issue and incorporated that in your scripting, you can re-use that without having to solve the problem again.Another example was wanting individual pages in a document to have different dimensions. It's an unusual thing to want to do, but it was useful for me to be able to generate differently sized images for a puzzle and its solution. You can do it in the GUI. The way I found to do it programmatically was to create a new document with the new size, and import that back in to the main document. It works well, but you shouldn't have to work around limitations in this way.
Christian
Publishing, 51-200 employees
Used daily for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
3
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
3
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed November 2021
The best alternative to expensive Adobe InDesign
Good experience
PROSScribus supports different formats including Adobe formats and that is helpful and facilitates the smooth workflow. It's free and works on different operating systems without compromising features. Still it has professional features without breaking banks. Frequent updates keep it stay on top of tech advancements. Better handling of XML files than InDesign
CONSIt requires a learning efforts for the beginners. Still lacks some features given by InDesign but the price makes it the best for budget conscious professionals
Cheikh
Media Production, 51-200 employees
Used weekly for less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
4
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
4
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed May 2023
My Experience with Scribus for Document Creation
Overall, my experience with Scribus has been generally positive. I'm impressed with the features of this desktop publishing software. It has enabled me to create professional documents efficiently and effortlessly. I would recommend Scribus to anyone looking for a reliable tool for creating professional documents
PROSI recently used Scribus to create documents and I must say that I was impressed by its features. What I like most about this software is its ability to seamlessly handle different types of content such as images, text, tables, and graphs. The layout is intuitive and it's easy to customize the elements to achieve a professional final output.
CONSHowever, I have to admit that I encountered some issues when using Scribus. Firstly, there are times when images don't display correctly, which can be quite frustrating. Additionally, the exporting process can take some time, which can slow down the workflow. Although these issues are minor, they can still impede the user's efficiency.
Sunjida
Verified reviewer
Media Production, 51-200 employees
Used weekly for less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
4
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed September 2022
Works perfectly for publishing media and is an open source.
It works great to make some publishing designs. Compare to other software I love the performance of Scribus and its open source.
PROSScribus is great in terms of publishing software. It's easy to operate. I use it to create book covers and some magazine layouts
CONSI didn't get any major issue. It's okay to me.
Reason for choosing Scribus
Pricing.
Reasons for switching to Scribus
Adobe InDesign is a subscription base and Scribus is free. So, it's easy to take a decision on a good alternative.
Gabriele
Verified reviewer
Writing and Editing, 1 employee
Used monthly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
5
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed October 2023
Scribus has been an important part of my open source suite of software for years!
Scribus is useful, easy to learn but deep enough to be an important tool for creativity!
CONSMaybe it's a bit rough around the edges, sometimes...
Benjamin
Research, 10,000+ employees
Used monthly for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed June 2023
Excellent publishing software
Nothing to complain about for a free software application that's easy to use (even for professionals).
PROSAlmost the only free, open-source desktop publishing software with a graphical user interface! Professional work is easy to do.
CONSOccasional crashes, some bugs with the text editing interface, which is not taken into account in the history.
William
Verified reviewer
Publishing, 1 employee
Used monthly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
4
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed April 2022
Ideal software for publishing
I found it fairly easy to create book covers with Scribus, as well as signs and posters.
CONSSome difficulty embedding certain fonts when exporting to PDF.
Bruno
Primary/Secondary Education, 1,001-5,000 employees
Used weekly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
4
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
2
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed October 2022
Scribus- MAquetación y Diseño de Publicaciones
Teniendo en cuenta que no tiene costo y sus herramientas son muy buenas es un Software totalmente recomendado.
PROSPrimeramente es gratis, muy bueno para introducción del mundo de la edición de publicaciones sin realizar una inversión . Sobre todo cuando se encuentra comenzando sus actividades profesionales. Otra ventaja es que funciona en multiples plataformas, LINUX, Windows y Mac OS.
CONSEl soporte no es muy bueno y muchas veces se presentan problemas con la conexión con drivers de impresoras profesionales así cómo perfiles de color para imprenta. También tiene dificultades en maquetear para HTML. Tampoco no es muy requerido por la industria profesional.
Liz
Cosmetics, 1 employee
Used monthly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
4
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed October 2022
Kostengünstiges Programm zur Gestaltung von Werbematerialien
Ich bin begeistert, was einem hier geboten wird!
PROS- einfache Lösung zur kostengünstigen Gestaltung von Werbemitteln und -anzeigen (wie z.B. Broschüren, Visitenkarten, Beschilderungen, Werbeanzeigen für Facebook, etc.) - bietet sehr viele Funktionen und Einstellmöglichkeiten - die Abspeicherung eines Projektes im hauseigenen Scribus-Format ermöglicht es einem zügig und unkompliziert Änderungen an diesem vorzunehmen und dieses im gewünschten Endformat nochmal neu abzuspeichern., somit sind Anpassungen auch noch nach längeren Zeitspannen kein Problem - nach gründlicher Einarbeitung in die Funktionsweise von Scribus ist die Handhabung sehr einfach
CONS- die Anwendung der Software ist nicht selbsterklärend, es erfordert etwas Einarbeitung in die Funktionen und Abläufe bevor einem die Anwendung leicht von der Hand geht., dies ist jedoch bei anderen Software dieser Art auch nicht anders, vorallem wenn es um größere Projekte geht
Juan
Verified reviewer
Graphic Design, 1 employee
Used monthly for more than 2 years
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed October 2022
Programa de maquetación de código abierto
Es idela para trabajos rápidos de maquetación de folletos, revistas o libros cortos, ya que cuando se trabaja con grandes documentos le cuesta un poco más mover la información. Es tan bueno para preparar documentos para imprenta en formato pdf o eps como cualquier otro programa del mismo tipo.
PROSEs muy fácil de usar con opciones muy parecidas a los programas de maquetación editorial y de revistas de pago. Lo mejor es que es gratuito y de código abierto.
CONSUna de sus ventajas es también una desventaja, al ser de código abierto no dispone de actualizaciones periódicas que permitan la integración de nuevas funciones con agilidad, como hacen otros programas.
Anonymous
1 employee
Used monthly for less than 12 months
OVERALL RATING:
4
EASE OF USE
3
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
3
FUNCTIONALITY
4
Reviewed May 2023
scribus open source
- PDF support- open source- wide range of tools and features for layout and design- pritty large community
CONS- can be more challenging to learn- limited templates- Scribus may encounter occasional stability issues, such as crashes or glitches
Paavo
Verified reviewer
Civil Engineering, 201-500 employees
Used monthly for less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed January 2023
Ein übersichtliches aber gutes Programm
Es ist ein gutes Programm, wodurch man Bilder und Text super einfach und schön zusammenschieben und bearbeiten kann. Es erfüllt alle Anforderungen die ich brauche und ist einfach, aber dennoch mit einer großen Palette von Funktionen gesegnet.
PROSMeiner Meinung nach ist das Einfügen von Bildern, sowie die Textfelder die wichtigste Funktion. Beides ist leicht verständlich und schon nach ein paar Minuten weiß man, wie man die wichtigsten Funktionen benutzen kann.
CONSFür meine Zwecke hatte die Software alle notwendigen Funktionen. Deshalb habe ich keine Funktion, die schlecht wäre.
Reason for choosing Scribus
Mir wurde es von einem Bekannten vorgeschlagen, da er diese Software auch verwendet.
Stefan
Newspapers, 1 employee
Used monthly for less than 6 months
OVERALL RATING:
5
EASE OF USE
5
VALUE FOR MONEY
5
FUNCTIONALITY
5
Reviewed January 2023
Scribus auch für Hochzeitszeitungen geeignet!
Hochzeitszeitungen, Flyer ausprobieren, ein Buch habe ich noch nicht umgesetzt, wäre aber natürlich möglich.
PROSDie einfache Einarbeitung. Nach und nach steigt man immer tiefer ein, wer jedoch nur mit ersten und einfachsten Möglichkeiten dieses Programmes arbeiten möchte, erzielt auch schöne Ergebnisse.
CONSIm Endeffekt muss man sich eine Druckerei suchen, die z.B: eine Hochzeitszeitung dann auch druckt. Das ist möglich, Vorschläge direkt aus dem Programm heraus wären jedoch schön.