Our overall test execution time for every release was very high, since we shifted to remote working. We had to find a solution that would help us radically reduce our test execution time and help us with faster deployments. Moreover our UI had multiple API dependencies which prompted us to leverage browser automation testing. By running tests in parallel on the lambdatest platform we reduced our testing time from 50 minutes to 10 minutes. This really helped the team in getting faster feedback, in a better way using LambdaTest integrations and put more focus on code quality.

LambdaTest solved our core challenge of reducing the test execution time further improving the feedback loop significantly. The ability to run tests in parallel on a cloud infrastructure is smooth. We could quickly and continuously execute hundreds of tests in our builds with the help of Circle CI LambdaTest integration. UI is very intuitive , features like test analytics, custom tags makes the job for my team easy to filter out tests results for the team.

There were a few stability issues while using simulators and we expressed the concern to the support team. Would be great to replace simulators with real devices for better efficiency.

Overall Good Experience

Real Time device available.Easy to find the device along with the latest versionBug Capturing

Sometimes it don't support the heavy page load. Loading issue problem. Slow work

It is faster than other tools when testing browsers on different devices.

It is still too slow in performance when trying to test apps.

1. A great collection of real devices 2. Easy to use and navigate

Pricing can be more flexible for low usage.

10/10 is the minimum, at least on our use-case. The UI/UX is surprisingly better and the "boot" time to the VM and browser is a lot faster than BrowserStack.Not that BrowserStack isn't a good product. It is. But Lambdatest take it to another level.

The price-performance ratio. For about 50% of similar plan on BrowserStack, I get an astonishing fast and complete experience.

No cons. I wish I had discovered Lambdatest sooner.

Their customer service is very good and their pricing is reasonable for all that they offer.

We don't need to maintain our own grid for every conceivable OS and browser version. LambdaTest does all of that for you.

We have found some issues related to webdrivers and we have to use custom translations for Firefox and Safari browser and we are still unable to successfully run all of our tests on Safari browser.

Neutral

I like the variety of devices provided on lambda test and Location options.

It does not show real ip and give organic testing

LambaTest allowed us to perform testing on OS/Browser combinations that we do not possess and that would be otherwise be costly to obtain. It allowed us to ship a better product with little additional effort.

The ease with which you can test on wildly different environments, and the amount of possible environments combinations are great. This get you covered for your whole user base

Sometimes the speed of environment deploying is not great, though it is a rather minor issue.

I used to test my final landing pages, I don't have an iPhone with me then I have to test using LambdaTest, I really liked how quickly I can test my website, without any problem.

I think you can have some special prices for only mobile tests or something like that because I really don't need to use the another resources, only the iOS Browser website test and the website picture take.

I love it, I need to explore more on local testing with this.

Is a great alternative to BS, it is a great tool for web testing

I have spent a lot of time with it, so I don't have cons at the moment.

Overall, I would highly recommend Lambdatest to anyone in need of a reliable, easy-to-use cross-browser testing platform. The platform's extensive range of features and its ability to seamlessly integrate with existing business processes make it an excellent choice for anyone looking to streamline their testing process and ensure the highest level of quality

Lambdatest is an excellent cross-browser testing platform that I have been using for a while now. The platform has a range of features that have been incredibly impactful for my testing needs. One of the most impactful features for me is the ability to test my web applications across a wide range of browsers, operating systems, and devices, all from a single platform. This has been incredibly helpful in ensuring that my web applications are functional and accessible for all users, regardless of their device or browser preferences

One potential downside of the platform is that it can be somewhat pricey, especially for smaller businesses or individual users who only need to test a limited number of web applications. The platform offers a range of pricing plans based on the number of concurrent sessions and the length of the subscription, but these plans can be quite expensive compared to some of the platform's competitors.

Our team uses LambdaTest to develop websites, software or other digital applications as part of the software testing process. One of the most important features is automated screenshot testing that helped us to identify browser compatibility issues of our websites by capturing instant automated screenshots across multiple real browsers and OS combinations. This is extremely helpful when you discover a design flaw in a particular browser and notify the developer. We could also capture the automated screenshots that are behind the login authentication. Besides, the bonus tool automated screenshot scheduler helped save our time to capture screenshots at regular intervals without logging into LambdaTest.

Parallel Testing with selenium and cypress both. Automated screenshots and sharing across integrations. Complimentary LT Browser access. Test responsive design for both major mobile and desktop platforms. Smart testing to identify visual regression bugs by offering pixel-to-pixel comparison.

Real device support is not there for mobile website testing. No native app testing support.

it was a 9/10

ease of understanding, easy to use for beginners

support is not that good, still not that important of an issue

The product is way better than anyone else

The Reports and automation runs very smooth even though we have 100 of test cases

The cost of the application is super expensive for the users like me who like to use but because of over pricing

Being able to test on multiple browsers all in one place makes my job easier, and their customer service is always fast to respond and super helpful.

Real-time testing is available on the free version, and the paid version allows for multiple paralyzations. They offer automation testing on the paid version.

There were specific tests that I ran on Safari that passed but didn't pass on an actual device which makes me a little bit skeptical about their simulators; however, that was only about 10% of the time, which is to be expected with most simulators out there.

We were able to very easily move our TestCafe automation from CrossBrowserTesting to LambdaTest which was a big benefit as we did not have to take a large amount of time to make the transition and keep us away from more important product work. So far, LambdaTest has been very reliable and has no required much babysitting which is very much appreciated.

LambdaTest enables us to run automated test suites against all the browsers our users use in a reliable and fast manner.

The manual testing option sometimes allows me to choose browsers and versions that do not actually work so I have to try and find one that does. This is especially true when working with older browsers.

It has a lot of browsers and real devices, is easy to use the tunnel

The dev tools are really slow and it gets tricky to click

We have goals to reach zero-error and zero-bug for our high-end ticket clients and LambdaTest makes it possible automatically, with its tools, integrations and API available.

We like the issue tracker of the system and the Trello / Github integration, it gives my coworkers the ability to help me fix issues and bugs. Sometimes we may need to initiate our project locally, especially the private ones and that's what we like with LabdaTest, it has binaries available for Windows and Android that can process the tests locally. The best features is that we can take sceenshots via API. It helps us test different device features and then view the results.

It's not affordable for everyone. We use LambdaTest mostly for big high-budget projects where the client will not think money at all and will demand zero-error-margin. That's where testing is must-have!

Amazing

The features offered at the price point was really good. It makes it very easy to do my job. I really like the addition of the LT Browser app as that makes it even quicker to test things.

The latest iOS versions aren't always available.

I liked it because it has helped me report and fix many existing UI issues and has helped in automation.

The most important feature I like about Lambdatest is that it is very user-friendly due to its good UI, plus it provides all the latest devices to use even updating its browser versions. It even gives inspect type function to check the functionality in different devices which is useful for me.

It doesn't provide types of laptop devices which is not good, it should provide as it provides various mobile devices rest of the functions are good.

Various devices available for app testing and multi browsers available for website testing in real time

Some times the support is not on time and small laptops are also not available for real device testing

I liked the screenshots and real time testing features

There weren't enough short term pricing options

Great

Lambdatest was the obvious choice due to its easy to understand features. We wanted a tool such as this to test our website before launch. We were able to connect the tunnel and can test the locally hosted applications. What really made our decision for LambdaTest was One-Click bug login feature. We were able to push the bug from anywhere on the platform if we found the issue. Smart UI really helped us in Visual regression bugs. They have done a great job in terms of browsers availability and Tunnel availability.

Can't think of any as of now.

One word: FANTASTIC

I really like the price point and features on Lambda Test. They have great functionality and features. With the many options they provide, I'm able to test websites on multiple platforms to make sure they work correctly on specific devices. Their customer service is by far the best I've seen in similar companies. They worked with me and helped me with anything I needed.

Had very few issues overall. The only negatives are, if you use high resolutions the tests can be slightly laggy, but that's expected. It's works very well 90% of the time.