It's a good software to list and distribute your test cases and ask people to review it and the fact that if you've some test cases which you may use, again and again, you can easily clone them.!!

It's easy to use and clearly distributed.

So far I didn't face any issues with this software.

We use TCL for manual regression testing and based on test scenarios, we can easy automate critical paths.

Simple and intuitive UI. We can create projects and manage users. Test runs are intuitive and we can tranfer them to other (non-QA) teams to execute.

1. Attaching files (images) to test cases is a little problem. It could be better to have possibility to attach images directly in text (like in YouTrack). Example: text text text [image] text text text 2. Linking to test cases doesn't work. When we link one test case in another, link goes to the main page of the project.

The test case management tool need some heavy QA and design review to be functional tool. Too many bugs and missing features to be of value.

Looks pretty, there is minimal added value with this product. The cons seriously out weigh any pros

Missing links to test plans. Inconsistent test cases ordering, changes based on ???, edit a test case and the order changes. Scrolling lists don't scroll through entire list. Search by tags shows items that don't have those tags. Sloooow response time. Category three is only 4 deep. Test runs show all categories, not just the categories in the test run. Test run columns over lap each other. Tags don't show in suggested list. Creating a test case in a specific category will sometimes drop it in a different category, so user has to keep moving cases to the correct category. Test case order randomly changes, when writing a test plan to be run in a specific order this causes a massive headache.

We use TCL in our organization. It helps us with regression tests. I was using TCL in my previous workplace.

Tool is easy to use. Price is resonable and unlimited users is the thing we like the most :) Test plans are easy to run. I like also the integration with Jira (but it could be better, for example doesn’t add screenshots to the created task).

Some bugs (linking test cases in other test case in markup language are not intuitive, manual order should be a default). Weird billing system - it is not directly connected to the tool.

Support is very responsive. The developers and designers are obviously listening and working to make a better product. I'd recommend this to any small or medium-sized shop.

TcL has pretty much everything that I was looking for to build a robust test suite. Navigating, entering, and keeping track of test cases are a breeze.

The only con is that I can't yet break down cases to pass/fail steps, but that is apparently already on the way.

Adding the first review for TCL so I should highlight the feature they have. 1. Unlimited Project option 2. Unlimited User 3. Can run multiple test run at one time 4. Tagging and version control 5. Export-Import feature 6. Assign Test case type and category(You can create your own) 7. Nice Dashboard which includes current edited in the sidebar. 8. Integration with project management tool (Like- Jira, YouTrack, Redmine, Pivotaltracker, Asana.) 9. Having a straightforward plan/pricing (No rockets math added- Pay for test cases.)

They can add more feature or they can customize more. Looks they started recently so it will take time but they can add more features to help QA team. Integration part can be more flexible and also you can guys also provide for Slack integration and you guys can add checkpoint that which level you want to notify. This will help QA team and also it will give a chance slack user to have a look. One specific comment for "support team" which is really helpful from their end, I didn't get such message like"Can't be done".

We are small team of internal product managers within a larger publishing organization. We manage several software platforms and applications used across the enterprise and provide project management for system upgrades and development. TestCaseLab has been great for us. The price model allowed us to use it as we needed to--having our internal customers/end users run tests and record results in the system. TestCaseLabs is easy for non-technical users to learn and use. New features are added regularly, and we have frequently seen a direct connection between our suggested features and the ones introduced in new updates. All around a great experience.

- Pricing model (not based on agents or users) - Ease of use--able to easily train end users to use it for acceptance testing - Great, responsive customer support

- Lack of test sequencing: We have workflows that we need to test in the systems, and this means that multiple end users collaborate in a sequence of tests. It would be incredibly helpful to be able to sequence these tests (create dependencies) and to pass information from the prior test along to the next test/tester.

Simple to set up and use. One of the best features is that you can update test cases on the fly during a test run. I also love that you can manually rearrange the test order when working on test runs. I have found this very helpful.

I do wish there were a way to make a comment about a test run. Not so much about a particular case, but the entire run. If we have to stop a run because of any major issue, it would be nice to document why that run was stopped and not completed, under the main test run (rather than needing to search through the individual cases in the run).

It is a great tool for test case management. A few things though that needs a little twist for it to be on top of the world. If you could fix the reporting apart. The reports are not that good. Also, implement test suites. I am looking at a situation where I can add test cases from different project into one test plan.

1. Ease of use 2. Ability to export test cases and test runs

1. The fact that a test plan is limited to one project only.

The software is pretty easy to understand and get up and running on manual testing. Good if you need a quick solution that doesn't require users to think too much.

Users sometimes get confused between test cases and test runs. It's a problem when the user can alter globally a test case while on a test run--they may, for example, attach their screenshots to the case and not the run, and all the other users sharing the case will have those changes/screenshots on their own runs.

I really wanted TCL to work for me. It helped drive the process to fully document the tests that needed to be performed before releasing a new software version. I still refer to it, but via links from a project management tool where I can easily manage the overall project status, create alerts, and build in the proper sequence to automate the system more.

The support team was incredibly responsive and listened to feedback. It has a good breakdown with fields for comments, steps, and expected results/outcomes. It's relatively easy to use. My co-worker who manages a different software package absolutely loves this tool, but her software has very independent tasks as part of testing, so she's able to monitor progress. We like the ability to group and tag related tasks.

1) My testing involves multiple steps by different users and I had to manage alerting the next person in the series manually - there is no notification system built in. 3) The test status is pass or fail. In our scenarios, often a test might not completely fail -- e.g. the steps could be performed in the software correctly, but didn't generate a receipt.

We are successfully testing the migration of service providers, software upgrades, and launches of new services. Different business teams and stakeholders are able to validate that business critical functionality continues to work after major system upgrades.

Test Case Labs is simple to understand and use by most users regardless of technical acumen. Here at Duke University Pres we use TcL to provide simple step based testing plans and runs that can be assigned to various groups for User Acceptance, Regression, and Integration Testing. The progress of test runs is easily visualized by the project management team and the ability to import and export test cases allows for easy spreadsheet based reviews of test cases with different stakeholders

There is not an obvious way to create dependencies between test cases or to approximate that by allowing multiple user assignments for a test case (one assignee is allowed per case, users cannot be assigned per step). Creating test plans that require hand off between different departments/testers seems harder to manage without dependency management built in.

Easy to use and less expensive than other options, having tags is a PLUS

The management of the tags, seems to be easy to add them and search but delete them in bulk is a pain!!!!!!!!! I've asked for a fix on that and the answers are not suitable for our business

Price is good, Customer Support was helpful only needed once, They continue to develop adding new features, SAAS

They can add better reporting while rest of the system good they lack reporting options

Centralized test plans for QA/QC

Rich data on test cases and pretty straightforward UI. Now has a real API.

No way to share content between test cases and no way to share test cases between projects. Acceptance criteria and steps need more structured data to be useful for automated tests.

I like that it encourages testers to target scenarios individually. This tool is also simple to use and straight-forward to set up. The customer support is really great and I have a direct relationship with the product owners where they keep their door open to suggestions and feedback.

There was some bugs in the software when we first started using it. The quality is improving overtime.

1) it is very easy to use and understand. 2) it has feature to automatically send email to the project members. 3) it has import export feature 4) it provides unlimited users plan

This is good tool so I didn’t find anything which I need to mention here. Just to improve it more they can add more features to make it more efficient.

Unlimited project and user. Multiple test at one time. Nice UI. Easy pricing model.

I didn't have any issues :) Good software :)

Easy to use. Easy to login and setup. Easy to add test cases and steps.

Too expensive. Especially for small numbers of users. Given Jira test plugins are either free or <$10 per user/month, this tool is not economical.

It is very easy to use and to export test runs. We love it!

- Easy to use - Good UX - Great outcome - Easy to learn and setup

- You need to "know" test. - Ugly colors

Great tool for our testing purposes!! Clear cut format that helps everyone to know what to test.

It's collaborative! It's a great way to roll it out to a team that is regression testing and everyone knows their expectations.

It took some work to get more than 1 person on a test case. It would be nice if it integrated with JIRA, so if it failed, we could submit a ticket through the tool.

me likey

Test plans are very useful for me as a designer - I can always help our testers

UI could be nicer, the need for sorting every time test plans to manual ordering could be fixed

Price, performance, Multiple project handling

Test execution report, Hard to group tescases