We all love this LMS, its fits perfectly into our organization and training cultiure. We love that e could design the system to our vision and needs.

We searched over 20 vendors and ran an RFP with 10 LMS providers. Opigno came out on top as it ticked all the boxes. We used Drupal for our website and searched for an LMS that was Drupal-based and on-premise for added data security. Opigno offered the security, flexibility, and scalability we needed. The user interface needed to be easy to use and an LMS that was easy to administrate. We feel we have complete control over the platform, and we are happy with the decision.

Its an excellent LMS, a hidden gem not to be underestimated.

Working with [SENSITIVE CONTENT] and their team is a pleasure, they are always extremely responsive and eager to help with the software implementation. We're looking forward to the roadmap of Opigno 3 and eventually utilizing this tool in the app store as an app. My main concern/feedback is the admin user interface and switching between Drupal menus and Platon/Opigno interface to create and edit courses, groups, etc. If you do not have prior Drupal experience this scenario is a poor experience overall.

Built-in reporting and integration with mainstream course content platforms to build courses such as H5P, scorm files and video files. Easy to build courses overall once you understand the way the system works.

The admin user interface is a bit clunky between navigating the Drupal admin menu and the out-of-the-box Opigno/Platon interface. Very unclear when to use a course, class, learning path and benefits to each one (we originally built out the courses/classes incorrectly but realized too late so ended up having to reconfigure a few things to make it work). Reporting was great but integrating legacy user information could use some help overall so aggregate reporting is accurate if importing legacy users from other platforms. Developer costs to customize can make an affordable product extremely pricey. Offering a marketplace with pre-built themes that offer color and font customizations would help keep costs low for users who want a plug-and-play experience without large dev agency costs. Some teams would like to use Opigno as a marketing automation product with more personalization around weekly cadence of users starting at different weeks/pre-reqs and corresponding communications based on this personalization. This might be available but more workbooks/tutorials with setup could help utilize better. We might not be using a lot of cool features because lack of showcasing these options on Opigno demo sites.

n/a. No "pros" about this software come to mind.

Opigno's Drupal installation lags behind security releases by several months. Forces integration with another paid services. Learning Path Manager is too complex for our content managers.

Provides all features, which corporate requires. It is open source with no restrictions.

Module creation for integrations with external technologies is difficult

As already mentioned above Opingo offer a great tool of functionality right out of the box, while working with Connect-i in order to implement own features feels really smooth. There is a little bit of a learning curve for Drupal, but I guess that´s due to the power of it.

Open Source, Customizable, great Out-of-the-box Features, good UI/UX, relative easy to implement APIs

None, since all the feature were developed according to our spec or customized, so not much use of "standard" features (even though they´re already quite good).