---
title: "Clinical Conductor CTMS Reviews, Pros and Cons - 2026 Software Advice"
description: "Reviews of Clinical Conductor CTMS. Learn how real users rate this software's ease-of-use, functionality, overall quality and customer support. Talk to our advisors to see if Clinical Conductor CTMS is a good fit for you!"
source_url: "https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/clinical-conductor-ctms-profile/reviews/"
page_type: "reviews"
language: "en"
---

[Home](https://www.softwareadvice.com/)

/

[Clinical Trial Management Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/)

/

[Clinical Conductor CTMS](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/clinical-conductor-ctms-profile/)

/

Clinical Conductor CTMS Reviews

Software Advice offers objective insights based on verified user reviews and independent product and market research. When our advisors match you to a software provider, we may earn a referral fee.

[Overview](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/clinical-conductor-ctms-profile/)

Reviews

[Alternatives](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/clinical-conductor-ctms-profile/alternatives/)

# Clinical Conductor CTMS User Reviews

## Reviews summary

- Overall rating: 4.5/5
- Total reviews: 33

### Secondary ratings

- Ease of use: 4/5
- Customer support: 4.4/5
- Value for money: 4.2/5
- Functionality: 4.0/5

### Rating distribution

- 5 stars: 18 reviews (55%)
- 4 stars: 12 reviews (36%)
- 3 stars: 3 reviews (9%)
- 2 stars: 0 reviews (0%)
- 1 star: 0 reviews (0%)

### Most mentioned pros

- When BioOptronics owed Clinical Conductor all the employees were invested in the success and it showed.

## Clinical Conductor CTMS customer reviews

Showing reviews 1-25 of 33 (page 1).

### Great for managing a study

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Elizabeth G.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 201-500 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2019
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

Overall, this is an excellent application that helps you stay organized when managing a trial.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 4/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

This application is very helpful for managing a clinical trial comprehensively. I use it more for daily visits and scheduling. I love how I can see the visits and timepoints very clearly.

#### Cons

It’s a bit hard to learn at first, there’s so much you can do with it. Once you get the hang of it it’s great.

---

### Fast, Reliable Cloud based software 5.0

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Douglas M.
- Industry: Hospital & Health Care
- Company size: 5001-10000 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: August 2018
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

The ability of the system to track elements of a study to ensure you are capturing the functionality of the coordinator/PI time, ability to instill bonuses should it be needed, capture team coverage while primary will be out of office, recruitment management using social media and real time matrix showing financial analysis to make informed decisions on future studies. I would use their service and recommend to other research sites as well. Bio-optronics team has addressed every concerned we had in a prompt, courteous manner.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

I like the web conferences offered to ensure your staff and administrator for the system understand the full capabilities of the program used. The ability to manage your documents and print at multiple sites should you need to be very comforting. the two part verification for stipend payment to prevent errors

#### Cons

The inability to lock data once verified by the study manager or administrator to ensure all of the team who worked on study get the credit. Which once explained to their team is being addressed. During a rollback to correct data you may need to complete information twice as it resets to default staff, a minor inconvenience.

---

### Best CTMS system we've ever had.

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Melinda E.
- Industry: Medical Practice
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

Patient visits, Dr. Payments, Invoicing, Scheduling, basically everything.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

It does everything you can imagine you would need to run clinical trials. I learn something new weekly about this system.

#### Cons

The price of the system, and that you are limited on the number of studies.

---

### Long Term User

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: KATRINA M.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 2-10 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: March 2021
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

As a company that has used this program since the beginning it has been a valuable tool to our organization and has continued to grow with Research and the ever changing world. It is continuing to meet the needs of its customers and continues to ask what they can do better.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

This software helps to manage all aspects of our research organization from patient, study, billing, etc all in 1 software program.

#### Cons

There are so many tools within this software product, even after 10 years I still don't know everything and how to use each area.

#### Vendor response

Thank you for the nice review! We are pleased that CC CTMS is valuable to you and your research organization. As you know from experience, we are committed to your sucess and will continue adapting to industry trends and listening to the needs of our user community. This will be strengthened as part of Advarra.

Replied March 2021

---

### Clinical Conductor Support cannot be beat!

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Betsy H.
- Product usage: Used unspecified for unspecified
- Reviewed: June 2014
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

We began using Clinical Conductor at our site in 2008 and have been very happy with our decision ever since! You couldn't ask for better customer support!! From the beginning, all of our data was transferred from our previous CTMS with ease. Support team provided excellent training and continues to do so as the CTMS continues to evolve with changing needs at the site level. We have been able to consolidate every aspect of our business and streamline processes from pre-study site selection through close-out activities. Where previously everyone had created their own spreadsheets to monitor and measure metrics, now everything is automatic and reports can be generated at the "click of a button". The ease of exporting to Excel for those who want to maintain their spreadsheets is also wonderful! We have been able to increase our budgets for recruitment advertising by providing detailed metrics and tracking of every call received and the outcome of enrollment in our studies. We are a dedicated clinical research site with multiple offices and multiple investigators and Clinical Conductor has been a "life-saver" to effectively manage all of our projects. Our site typically has 60-70 active studies (in various stages from site selection through close-out) at all times so as you can imagine we have encountered virtually any "odd" scenario you could imagine over our 6 years of using Clinical Conductor and we have always been able to make everything work. My one suggestion to anyone considering investing in a CTMS is to have a dedicated staff member as your Administrator for set-up; staff training and point of contact. The system can appear to be overwhelming because of the many capabilities but that Administrator can ensure things work appropriately for your site and can also develop SOPs for use and training users to ensure smooth operation. Once you get established the ease of use of the system is apparent and if you find something that doesn't work for your site the Support Team always welcomes your suggestions and provides quick instruction on how to accomplish your goals.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 4/5
- Customer support: 5/5

---

### Infinity loves Clinical Conductor!

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Suzanne G.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 2-10 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

My owner is in another state and he can see everything from his computer that we are doing and can do his own reports....this is an amazing program!

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

You build your study in the beginning and everything is easy from there on out, like scheduling the appointments, stipends are automatically populated per patient! The reports that you can generate with a couple clicks makes our job so easy!!

#### Cons

Actually, I can't think of anything, I have always been so grateful to our owners that they picked this awesome program!!

---

### Review from the financial analyst perspective

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Lynn L.
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 12 months
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

Once we fully understood the various components this system is very easy to get around...invoicing for "invoiceable" items became very transparent and simplified. We moved from a completely Excel based system of study 'trackers' to CTMS and we're currently working a blend of both Excel & CTMS. Having the data at our fingertips without having to wait for month end processing was a strong argument for going with this model. The consultants were awesome and understood our current state business processes, working diligently with us to create the current CTMS business process.

#### Cons

I think the reporting could be more dynamic. I'd like to be able to have trending report; also reports that provide multiple 'answers' on just one report. This can be done, but not currently as a 'one stop report'. Time cards are coming in the next release...this was a high priority for us in choosing Clinical Conductor...not a con per se, but have not seen the final product yet.

---

### CC Review

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Jennifer B.
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 3/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

We purchased this program primarily for the scheduling functions. Coordinating multiple clinical trials in a small space with visits requiring patients to see multiple staff in multiple rooms requires more sophistication than we could manage. Having a program that schedules each element for us saves time and ensures that we are using staff and space as efficiently as possible.

#### Cons

The software is incredibly detailed, but that also makes it complicated. We've found that it generally takes staff 3-6 months to become proficient in navigating the system and even longer for staff to master it.

---

### Site Manager

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Michelle S.
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

We moved over from Study Manager to CC about 10 years ago as the financials were so much more and extremely easy to use. The customer service and training is exceptional. The company really thinks about the sites and users and always makes updates to the system.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 4/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

Ability to capture all aspects of the study, the site needs and financials.

#### Cons

really there is so much to offer that you find that you are never really sure how to work the system. When changes are made (really good as they are thinking of the users), it makes it hard because not all of the changes work with the way you did something before the change.

---

### Good, searching can improve

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Verified Reviewer
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 51-200 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 12 months
- Reviewed: February 2020
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

Huge data base filtering options, handles thousand of patients easily, custom dashboard

#### Cons

Searching can improve, this is the only bad thing I cant think of

---

### Easy to Use

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Jen W.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Product usage: Used unspecified for unspecified
- Reviewed: December 2016
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

I like this CTMS much better than others I have tried. It's easier to use and has more of the functions I need.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 4/5
- Functionality: 4/5

---

### Good but could be better for higher volume studies

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Jade R.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 51-200 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 2 years
- Reviewed: June 2025
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 3/5
- Customer support: 3/5
- Functionality: 2/5

#### Pros

It is somewhat user friendly with live support which is nice. There are lots of loops and technicalities with functions within the program that can make it a bit difficult to learn quickly without help. It could use some updates to make things easier/ clearer. It could also use some updates for scheduling functions.

#### Cons

I do wish the program had more group options. Especially with scheduling. It would be very useful for studies with lots of patients and would save a lot of time spent scheduling, cancelling appointments, checking off patient arrivals, changing status, ect. It can be quite exhausting having to go into each subject manually and then into visit management, then having to click manually schedule to then be able to modify an appointment.

---

### Clinical Conductor Strong & Steady

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Christine B.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Hospital & Health Care
- Company size: 501-1000 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: March 2025
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Clinical Conductor CTMS is wonderful for trial management, finance, recruitment, and scheduling. Once you learn the interface, there are lots of ways to view information. It's one downside is it does not offer electronic source or document management. If it did, it would truly be a one stop shop for clinical trial sites.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

Lots of different reports and ways to view data available

#### Cons

That it does not offer an esource solution

---

### No Hurry to Fix issues....

- Overall rating: 3/5
- Reviewer: Devona M.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: July 2023
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

When BioOptronics owed Clinical Conductor all the employees were invested in the success and it showed. Now

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 3/5
- Customer support: 1/5
- Functionality: 2/5

#### Pros

Prior to being purchased by Advarra I loved the product and the company. Service was great and personable. Now you are luck they even care.

#### Cons

At this time I dislike the service provided. When as they called it a program bug is detected and found they take over a month to get to it and uploaded. No rush no urgency they caused an issue that is impacting all the businesses using this product.

#### Reasons for choosing Clinical Conductor CTMS

The service and support that had been given. Again this was when BioOptronics owed it.

#### Reasons for switching to Clinical Conductor CTMS

The product was being discontinued.

---

### Disappointed

- Overall rating: 3/5
- Reviewer: Michelle G.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: May 2024
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 3/5
- Customer support: 3/5
- Functionality: 3/5

#### Pros

I liked Clinical Conductor a great deal in the beginning. The IT support was top-notch and there was a genuine vibe that we, as customers, really mattered.

#### Cons

Ever since Clinical Conductor was bought by Advarra, the quality has gone way down. The customer service is okay, but nowhere near the level it was before. Also, Advarra must have switched something internally because the system is s-l-o-w; pages take a long time to load and I get booted out every single day (and it is NOT because I've been inactive. I sometimes get booted out just switching from one page to another within CC). Also, when I set my default filters, they don't always "take" and I have to set over and over again. Not happy, not at all.

---

### Sound Medical Research

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Verified Reviewer
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 2-10 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

I've been using Clinical Conductor for about 5 years both as a clinical research coordinator and clinical trial manager and for the most part I've been happy with the product however the time it takes to navigate around for instance completing a visit, looking up an available time on the calendar then scheduling a visit or speaking to a CRA who needs to schedule a visit requires checking the calendar then going into studies choosing the study finding the monitor and scheduling the visit

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 4/5
- Functionality: 3/5

#### Pros

The interface looks good and it fairly easy and intuitive for navigate for the most part. I like the training that is available.

#### Cons

For many things it can take a lot of clicks to get to where you want to go. My personal wish would be able to much more from my weekly calendar screen, such as schedule appointments and non-stud appointments, approve stipends and complete visits. When scheduling a patient it would be nice to have the scheduled date ranges and times with a list of available time slots for that visit.

---

### Average Product

- Overall rating: 3/5
- Reviewer: Casey K.
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 51-200 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: August 2018
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

We've had the product for about 5 years. In my opinion, the product has great potential, but it consistently falls short on simple quality of life issues. For example, allowing the ability to sort all variables on a given page, and headers should remain static when scrolling down a large data set. Depending on the size of your organization, I would advise assigning an administrator for your site to help with establishing standard use guidelines and ensuring data quality. Without one, it can be very difficult to show reliable data or provide a "return on investment".

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 4/5
- Functionality: 3/5

#### Pros

Pros: Financial functionalities are quite adequate. However, it does not conform to budgets with visit payments and conditional, invoiceable items for payment very well. Visit management is adequate. However, there are limitations conforming to protocols that require conditional, as needed items. For example, capturing reportable events at times outside of a scheduled protocol visit are challenging. Affordable. Customer service is responsive and unlimited.

#### Cons

Usability, user experience. Can be very difficult to navigate and answer questions clearly and quickly. Workarounds can be common and confusing for end users. Recruitment functionality is cumbersome and not customizable. Especially for sites where the pre-screening process can take weeks to months for a study.

---

### Time Saving

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Christiana E.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Hospital & Health Care
- Company size: 501-1000 employees
- Product usage: Used weekly for less than 12 months
- Reviewed: August 2021
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

Clinical Conductor CTM helps you focus on your patients and hence, improved patients care, thus minimizing complications that might result from delays from using other methods.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

Clinical Conductor CTM Streamlines Complex Trial process, thereby maximizing Time.

#### Cons

it requires adequate knowledge or training of the record Staff or Software user.

---

### I love Clinical Conductor!

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Ellie M.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Customer Service is second to none. I've always had a great experience with everyone from the sales team to the support staff. Fun people with a great work ethic and sense of humor!

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

It's easy to use, very intuitive and provides many of the reports that I need for our site.

#### Cons

I would like for it to be able to integrate and import data from our EHR system.

---

### Comprehensive but limited in efficiency

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Ryan H.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 2 years
- Reviewed: December 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 4/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

Comprehensive Lots of functionality Staff is helpful and responsive Somewhat intuitive

#### Cons

-Too many features that are not connected with each other. Lots of functionality exists but there is a lack of coordination between them. I find myself asking "Why wouldn't they link these two things?" -Biggest complaint is that you need CCE and CCS to have a truly integrated system (expensive). Otherwise, you have to use work arounds to get the solution you need.

---

### Happy User

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Verified Reviewer
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 4/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

The system is very easy to navigate and user friendly.

#### Cons

It would be helpful if the system tracked manual payments, especially travel.

---

### Clinical Conductor Review

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Deborah S.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 2-10 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

The financial reports are helpful to our accounting department. We have used this program for many years and it has been getting better and more useful as we learn more on how to use it ourself.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 4/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

We heavily rely on the schedule portion and it is fairly easy to use. Many improvements over the years that have made it even better.

#### Cons

A few more shortcuts would help especially in demographics entry.

---

### Highly customizable

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Rossmeri M.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Research
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2018
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Its great for prescreening study subjects. Keeping detailed study financials.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 3/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

You can find several ways to use the software features to fit your site processes

#### Cons

Its very 'click' heavy and requires function- specific staff training and practice to become proficient. Said differently, it is not intuitive and you need someone to teach how to use it well.

---

### Review of Clinical Conductor use

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Marie B.
- Product usage: Used unspecified for unspecified
- Reviewed: June 2014
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

I had the privilege of being one of the first sites to get up and running and be trained by someone from Clinical Conductor at our office. It was still fairly new and had kinks to be worked out but over the years it has grown so much. I really like how when they get ready to do an update sometimes they will use our site as the one to test it out on first. I think they know I will be the one to say something first. LOL I feel like a part of the Clinical Conductor family and feel as if I helped change and come up with new ways and things this system can do because I based it on our system before CC and what that system could do and when we went live I saw things I felt CC could do even better. Like any new system there are kinks to work out even when they have updates, you don't know what or how it is going to really affect things until it comes out and the sites try it. If other sites are like me I play around with it to see how things work or not work and if I see where something would be better due to the fact that I work on CC so much I call or email them and share my ideas with them. They are very accommodating to suggestions to see how they can make it happen. Once they take it to the programmers and if the programmer does not see that the system can do it they usually try and come up with something very similar. Love working with the people at CC. You work with them so much and for so long you get attached to them. They know when I call I really need them or I have a problem, then sometimes I go for a while before they hear from me. It also make me feel very special when I call and they know who I am by my voice. The Dutchess I am called by some, I like that. lol

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 4/5
- Customer support: 5/5

---

### Easiest program to learn and maneuverable friendly. Scheduling made easy.

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Jennifer H.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Medical Practice
- Company size: 501-1000 employees
- Product usage: Used weekly for less than 6 months
- Reviewed: April 2019
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

We use Clinical Conductor in our research dept here at Providence. I have not been using this program very long, going on five to six months now. This was the easiest program I have ever learned. There are multiple ways to find subjects. Scheduling them is easy and you have the ability to schedule subjects noting what visit in the study they will be coming in for. We can also specify if the subject's visit will be via phone or in the clinic. We also have the ability to put in AS MUCH info about the subject as we can. Contact info. Demographic info. Diagnosis etc. We can block time in a similar manner if we need to book a conference room for a monitor meeting. Scheduling is easy. I prefer to manually schedule. Basically, you review the site calendar. Find the subject, note you would like to schedule manually. Pick the date and the time. A few clicks of the mouse and the subject is scheduled also noting what visit # for the study the subject is coming in for. Easy to reschedule subjects as well. This program stores a lot of info , is easy to learn and maneuver, ability to do A LOT simply.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

How easy it is to learn and navigate and the different ways you can search for a subject, either by study, by name, etc. How the system allows you to put in a lot of information about the subject.

#### Cons

Honestly, I am pretty satisfied with the software.

## More reviews

[Next reviews](https://www.softwareadvice.com/clinical-trial-management/clinical-conductor-ctms-profile/reviews/?page=2)

---

Clinical Conductor CTMS Reviews, Pros and Cons - 2026 Software Advice