The very best feature for me and from my point of view is the feedback possibility. It encourages people to send praises and give good feedback as well as asks you to get feedback from the others. Asking feedback in a normal conversation might feel awkward or not natural at all so this lowers the barrier to ask for a constructive feedback. And obviously giving the right type of feedback also needs to be practised and Teamsepctive gives good insight and help questions to fill in the right type of feedback.

The features I would like to have a wider view is on the pulse surveys. The 2.0 is on the way and the topics are wider so maybe that is the key to this challenge. The pulse questions have been more or less the same though couple of months so having more topics could keep it more interesting and maybe help others to be interested in longer.

Overall good. It's nice to get feedback from peers. It's great that we have the public slack channel where the boosts are broadcast, even when they are person to person. It creates an atmosphere that encourages more cheers and boosts, which I believe is beneficial for all.

It has an automated schedule that keeps asking me for input. Good frequency, not too often not too rarely. It guides and encourages towards giving feedback and boosts for peers.

I don't know if using this tool has lead to any actual actions from the employer. Concrete actions and followups would make this feel more significant. Right now it feels mostly like yelling in the void. It might be that our employer is doing something to fix issues, but there's no roadmap and checks to see if the actions taken fixed to lower results? Maybe the employer should set like a target to improve certain metric within a period, lay out the plan to improve it... Then verify after the period wether or not the metric improved.Also: It should ask more frequently who my teammates are, whom to send praise to. Our teams evolve constantly, and for example TS suggests me now to cheer a person I don't work with anymore. If I haven't praised them in times, ask for more suggestions.

It's quite a nice tool, but requires that the organisation using has got managers who actually look at the results and consider what they indicate for the company.

The cadence of pulses is not too much, nor too little. It is convenient to use as it integrates with Slack.

The questions seems to be the same most of the time. Some questions are formulated in a way that they get difficult to answer.

Overall we have been very satisfied with Teamspecitve as a tool, but also as a company. The founders and the whole team is actively involved with the development and actively seeking thoughts and ideas from the customers. They even host and facilitate gross customer idea sharing and development idea discussion.

We are because of our employees and customers. Keeping your staff and recruiting new people is key to our growth and profitability. For this we want to be on pulse how our people are feeling on their daily work and lives. Teamspective provides us an easy and convenient way to gather analytics from multiple different perspectives from our employees. The tool provides us very comprehensive analytics and up to date reports and still from respondents perspective the tool is easy, fast on non disturbing to use.

We were onboard with teamspective from very early stages so some of the features were not so "finalized". Still I would say that the cooperation with teamspective staff and constant development of the tool based on the customers feedback has provided us all the needed functionalities.

Customer support has been amazing! Very consultative approach, instead of just answering the questions.

The feedback tool has been extremely valuable to us, the UI is great! The feedback from employees has been very positive, a lot of employees mentioned this in our last development discussion round.

The software itself has been very user friendly. However, the combination of ATS, HR system + Teamspective makes it relatively cost-heavy package for a small company like us.