GitLab Software

Pros

Use complements and framework of git lab, the great thing about this platform is the simplicity that it has when integrating the versions or searching the versions of the projects.

Cons

I do not like the handling in the team that has this platform of versions since it is a bit slow and can not modify the same file at the same time.

Pros

Flexible, can be self hosted. Private repos for free (what got me to migrate some projects from GitHub). Fast and easy to use interface.

Cons

Doesn't have the open source community that github does. Other than that not too many cons, love it and use it everyday.

Pros

It has lots of pros like provide free hosting, version controlling is same as git, very clean interface. User can have free private repositories

Cons

Viewing large file is difficult. The UI interface is bit slow - takes some time while switching from one page to another.

Pros

This tool is used to store the source code of software projects and their versions, excellent graphic environment

Cons

It is a limited tool for the storage capacity for the projects besides being expensive for new companies

We use Gitlab as our main versioning system for software development. It is free and easy to use and you can choose from many functionalities.

Pros

The support is excellent; Gitlab responsds quickliy to support issues. The community is very helpful. Gitlab has a clear and concise interface. You can have free private repositories. It has many new optional features, such as burndown charts, issue tracking, milestones, estimates, etc. The communication regarding updates is very good; they are announced in time and also a brief description of the update is given.

Cons

Third party integration is a a bit limited. The interface may change a little after an update; a function may switch to another part on the page and it can be quite a hassle to search for the functions again.

It is possible to share projects with other users and invite them to contribute directly, without having to fork, or, if the repository is public

Pros

Is a tool that provides many functions, such as Git with version control, JIRA request management, and other. Which are administered in a single product and, therefore, are easier to install and administer

Cons

Only is avaliable for linux software and others, except for windows, but windows users can use it form the web app.

Ability to work smoothly as a team.

Pros

It makes collaboration on various projects easy and clear. We always know who is working on what -- it minimizes confusion and is great for task management.

Cons

Wish it had a whiteboard that we could all work on at the same time - instantly. We have to jump to something else for this.

Pros

While GitLab pulls in many of the resources under one roof such as their internal tools that GitHub relied on from other vendors, like separate CI/CD, Trello, Wikis, etc. , I recently played around with it and found it to be incredibly slow and unreliable. In theory, it sounds really nice to have everything under one roof, but the bottom line is speed and reliability are important to me and therefore I will not use GitLab.

Cons

Why is CodePen using GitLab? Well, they mitigate some of the issues with hosted GitLab by using the on-premise version of GitLab. The problem there is it means they need to manage it themselves, which for some might be okay, but it isn't okay for us. We like having others manage our infrastructure so we can focus on what we do best, and other business productivity and learning related solutions. Managing servers is not our goal.

I mostly use this platform to search and use the repositories and integrate the codes I need for my website.

Pros

It offers a better navigation in terms of searching repositories, and managing the files so you can add your repositories.

Cons

They removed some of the useful functions that were in the github and added more options so you can separate your repositories, but this is a bit more confusing.

Pros

- Can be self hosted if you're worried about security
- Gives you private repos for free (a big plus over GitHub)
- Has pretty much all of the same features as GitHub
- Pretty much everything you need in a source management tool
- Has Continuous integration/deployment built in

Cons

- Doesn't have the mass userbase that github has
- Can be a little harder to use than github.
- Not as many integrations with other services as github.

Pros

It is simple and easy to use, offers a wide range of features for single and team based developers. Plus it is scale-able as your team needs grow over time.

Cons

It feels like a knock off at times. I'm not sure if it is the actual product or the design, but it just feels... off?

Clear internal communication before we communicate externally.

Pros

I'm sure this is largely due to the great people I work with, but I can find all the info I need about our pending software releases.

Cons

I wish every page/section had the ability to subscribe so I knew when the section is updated. In some places you can, others you can't.

Pros

This application is one of the best to store application source code, it is very versatile and its graphic environment helps to perceive the changes made

Cons

the main disadvantage of gitlab is for small projects or new companies that is very costly and the free option is to upload only open source applications

It has worked for the resolution of faults and elaboration of new projects that we have developed in the company without affecting the production line.

Pros

-The new verison are more faster on DevOps Cycle.
-Meets the objectives for which it was created.
-Interface that allows you to view the code versions, change permissions and connections via ssh and https.

Cons

-You need to have advanced server configuration knowledge to install this application on a server.
-graphical interface a bit messy and unintuitive.

I was part of a team that create the whole administration of several projects using Gitlab technologies

Pros

GIT integration, it allows long group of people to contribute in a private project. All the needed modules to make a repository work (Branches, Pull Requests, Activity, Contributions). And my favorites: Issue tracking and Continuous Integration Pipelines.

Cons

Issue tracking can be improved: Maybe some integration with software like jira, basecamp, etc could come handy. More documents inclusion for evidence in issues creations.

Pros

Project management approaches are very well supported. You have the confidence and security that your work is safe and secured.

Cons

3rd party integration could be improved. Polls and Ratings of other repositories could be posted for others to see.

Pros

- The free account even provides a lot of features and provide unlimited private repositories with unlimited collaborators.
- Gitlab provides software that helps to host the versioning system in our self-hosted systems which are great

Cons

- The UI is bit collapsed and unorganized.
- Gitlab has lesser integrations and its bit hard in making the integrations

Pros

- I've been Using Gitlab for my team and personally and the free plan is good enough for small and even medium teams
- The Ability to have single account for multiple companies and can add or remove your email to make the projects appearance is great

Cons

- They UI is bit old and its needs bit some time to used to it
- Gitlab might be down sometimes, but they fix things so quick if anything happens.

organization and control

Pros

facilities to use, have emoticons, meets the objectives for which it was created. Helps to organizate the work

Cons

Its more expensive and the free trail don´t have burdown chart to see follow the progress to the task

Pros

Have been using gitlabs as our remote repository for all our software development needs. The product is great and supports our Ajile development approach. Options to review the software and correct are also very helpful.

The pricing scale is reasonable, for as many users as necessary. APIs are great for introducing new ML features into your Dev Stack

Cons

Mostly a great product but is very similar to GitHub, Auto DevOps needs improvement also additional features around collab and source code management can make the product more robust