---
title: "Greenhouse Software Overview 2026 - Features & Pricing"
description: "Review of Greenhouse Software: system overview, features, price and cost information. Get free demos and compare to similar programs."
source_url: "https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/"
page_type: "product"
language: "en"
---

[Home](https://www.softwareadvice.com/)

/

[Recruiting Software](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/recruiting-software-comparison/)

/

Greenhouse

Software Advice offers objective insights based on verified user reviews and independent product and market research. When our advisors match you to a software provider, we may earn a referral fee.

Overview

[Reviews](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/reviews/)[Alternatives](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/alternatives/)

# Greenhouse Review

Custom quote 3 plans

Updated August 10, 2026

Written by [Bruno Peláez](https://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/author/bruno-pelaez/)

Senior Content Analyst

Edited by [Mehar Luthra](https://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/author/mehar-luthra/)

Team Lead, Content

Wondering if Greenhouse is right for your organization?

Our Recruiting Software selection experts can help you in 15 minutes or less.

On this page

-   Our Summary
    
-   User Interface
    
-   Popular Alternatives
    
-   Pricing and Plans
    
-   Features
    
-   Integrations
    
-   Key Sentiments
    
-   User Reviews
    
-   Frequently Asked Questions
    
-   Popular Comparisons
    

## Our Summary

Greenhouse

4.5

[(765)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/reviews/)

FrontRunner 2026

Pros:

-   Intuitive interface
-   Candidate tracking

Cons:

-   Reporting features
-   Customer support

Pricing

Pricing available upon request

### What is Greenhouse:

Greenhouse is an applicant tracking system (ATS) that helps manage every stage of the hiring process and compiles candidate demographic data, pass-through rates, and job post conversion reports. It also offers talent-sourcing tools, interviewing workflows, and onboarding features.

### Why we like Greenhouse:

Greenhouse is highly valued by users with a 4.5/5 star rating. Reviewers highlight the ease of use and customer support (4.4 stars) and note applicant tracking, candidate management, and recruitment management as top features.

### Who should use Greenhouse:

Greenhouse received the most reviews from businesses with between 51 and 200 employees, followed closely by enterprise-size organizations (1,001 to 5,000 employees). Smaller teams might appreciate streamlined applicant tracking and candidate management, while larger companies can leverage Greenhouse’s integrations and scalable workflows.

Wondering if Greenhouse is right for your organization?

Our Recruiting Software selection experts can help you in 15 minutes or less.

## Greenhouse User Interface

## Popular Greenhouse Alternatives

Main Product

Greenhouse

4.5

[(765)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/reviews/)

Ratings Breakdown

-   4.39Ease of use
-   4.21Value for money
-   4.36Customer support
-   4.31Functionality

Pricing

Available upon request

Get Price

Alternative Product

[BambooHR](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/bamboohr-profile/)

4.6

[(3553)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/bamboohr-profile/reviews/)

Ratings Breakdown

-   4.66Ease of use
-   4.46Value for money
-   4.50Customer support
-   4.42Functionality

Pricing

Starting at $10.00 per month

Get Price

Alternative Product

[micro1](https://www.softwareadvice.com/product/529654-micro1/)

4.9

[(865)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/product/529654-micro1/#reviews)

Ratings Breakdown

-   4.82Ease of use
-   4.64Value for money
-   4.63Customer support
-   4.74Functionality

Pricing

Starting at $89.00 per month

Get Price

Alternative Product

[100Hires](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/100hires-profile/)

4.9

[(1195)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/100hires-profile/reviews/)

Ratings Breakdown

-   4.89Ease of use
-   4.86Value for money
-   4.85Customer support
-   4.84Functionality

Pricing

Starting at $49.00 per month

Get Price

Alternative Product

[Paylocity](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/web-pay-profile/)

4.3

[(1930)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/web-pay-profile/reviews/)

Ratings Breakdown

-   4.33Ease of use
-   4.23Value for money
-   4.07Customer support
-   4.26Functionality

Pricing

Available upon request

Get Price

Alternative Product

[Paycom](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/paycom-profile/)

4.4

[(1391)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/paycom-profile/reviews/)

Ratings Breakdown

-   4.37Ease of use
-   4.24Value for money
-   4.36Customer support
-   4.36Functionality

Pricing

Available upon request

Get Price

## Greenhouse Overview

Greenhouse is an applicant tracking software and hiring platform designed to manage the recruitment process from sourcing candidates to onboarding new hires. It incorporates structured hiring methodologies to support consistent evaluation of candidates across various hiring initiatives.

The platform includes AI-powered tools that assist with generating candidate summaries, creating job boards, and developing interview plans. It provides scalable workflows that adapt to organizational needs and reporting features that deliver insights to assess and improve hiring performanc...

e. A filtering system is included to help identify qualified candidates. Greenhouse supports global hiring with localization options to maintain consistent practices across regions. It also includes onboarding features to assist new employees in transitioning into their roles.

## Greenhouse Pricing and Plans

Starting price: Connect with an advisor for pricing

Free Trial

Free Version

Core

Pricing available upon request

Plan includes:

-   Sourcing & CRM
-   Structured interview kits & scorecards
-   Scheduling
-   Reporting & analytics
-   SSO
-   Real Talent™: Talent Matching
-   AI Notetaker

Plus

Pricing available upon request

Plan includes:

-   Everything in Core, plus:
-   AI-powered report filters
-   Business Intelligence Connector
-   Greenhouse Sourcing Automation
-   Texting
-   Real Talent: fraud & spam detection

Pro

Pricing available upon request

Plan includes:

-   Everything in Plus, and:
-   Unlimited CRM events
-   Enterprise-level data configuration and security
-   Audit log
-   Developer sandbox & sync
-   Real Talent: enterprise-level features

Confused about pricing? We've got you covered.

Get a personalized pricing breakdown tailored to your specific needs—no guesswork, no generic estimates.

### Compare Pricing

Compare pricing across our most frequently recommended Recruiting products.

Software options

Starting price\*

User rating

[BambooHR](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/bamboohr-profile/)

$10.00 per month

4.60[(3553 reviews)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/bamboohr-profile/reviews/)

**570**

recommendations

[Workable](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/workable-profile/)

$299.00 per month

4.40[(662 reviews)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/workable-profile/reviews/)

**176**

recommendations

[AcquireTM](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/acquiretm-profile/)

$199.00 per month

4.46[(12 reviews)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/acquiretm-profile/reviews/)

**114**

recommendations

[isolved Talent Acquisition](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/applicantpro-profile/)

$99.00 per month

4.62[(381 reviews)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/applicantpro-profile/reviews/)

**97**

recommendations

[Darwinbox](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/darwinbox-profile/)

$1.00 per year

4.22[(45 reviews)](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/darwinbox-profile/reviews/)

**44**

recommendations

\*Defined as the price above any available free plan

## Greenhouse Features

Drawn from insights across 765 verified reviews, we've outlined Greenhouse's best and worst rated features and how they stack up against the average rating.

Greenhouse's score

Category average

Greenhouse's Best Rated Features

Electronic Forms

4.88

4.02 category average

Electronic Signature

4.86

4.20 category average

Resume Storage

4.55

4.32 category average

Greenhouse's Worst Rated Features

Candidate Sourcing

2.82

4.0 category average

Reporting/Analytics

3.52

4.11 category average

Onboarding

3.83

3.89 category average

-   Popular features found in Recruiting
    
    Assessment Management
    
    Background Screening
    
    Communication Management
    
    Job Posting
    
    Job Requisition
    
    Onboarding
    
    Resume Parsing
    
    Resume Search
    
    Self Service Portal
    
-   More features of Greenhouse
    
    Activity Dashboard
    
    Activity Tracking
    
    Alerts/Notifications
    
    API
    
    Applicant Tracking
    
    Application Management
    
    Approval Process Control
    
    Billing & Invoicing
    
    Boolean Search
    
    Calendar Management
    
    Candidate Management
    
    Candidate Profiles
    
    Candidate Sourcing
    
    Candidate Tracking
    
    Careers Page
    
    Collaboration Tools
    
    Compliance Management
    
    Compliance Tracking
    
    CRM
    
    Customizable Branding
    
    Customizable Fields
    
    Customizable Reports
    
    Customizable Templates
    
    Dashboard
    
    Data Import/Export
    
    Document Management
    
    Electronic Forms
    
    Electronic Signature
    
    Email Management
    
    Employee Database
    
    Employee Handbook
    
    Feedback Management
    
    HR Management
    
    Internal HR
    
    Interview Management
    
    Interview Scheduling
    
    Job Board
    
    Job Management
    
    Mobile Access
    
    Orientation Workflow Management
    
    Pipeline Management
    
    Real-Time Reporting
    
    Recruiting Firms
    
    Recruitment Management
    
    Reference Checking
    
    Reminders
    
    Reporting/Analytics
    
    Reporting & Statistics
    
    Resume Database
    
    Resume Storage
    
    Role-Based Permissions
    
    Search/Filter
    
    Social Media Integration
    
    Social Recruiting
    
    Tagging
    
    Task Management
    
    Third-Party Integrations
    
    Workflow Management
    

## Greenhouse Integrations

Based on 765 verified reviews, we've identified products most frequently integrated withGreenhouse.

HiBob

Integration rated 4.4 from 10 reviews

LinkedIn Recruiter

Integration rated 4.3 from 9 reviews

LinkedIn Jobs

Integration rated 4.5 from 8 reviews

Slack

Integration rated 4.8 from 8 reviews

Checkr

Integration rated 5.0 from 7 reviews

Microsoft Outlook

Integration rated 4.7 from 6 reviews

See all 90 integrations

## Greenhouse Key Sentiments

We analyzed 765 verified reviews for Greenhouse to find out what actual users really think.

Most Positive Sentiments

User interface

77% Positive

13% Neutral

10% Negative

Greenhouse’s interface is described as clean and easy to navigate, especially for teams with varying levels of technical experience. The layout supports quick access to key recruiting tools, and the dashboard helps reduce time spent on routine tasks. Customization options allow teams to tailor views to their workflows, though some users mention occasional difficulty locating less frequently used features.

Recruiting process

75% Positive

23% Neutral

3% Negative

The platform supports flexible recruiting workflows that can be adapted to different hiring needs. Teams benefit from automation that reduces manual effort and helps manage large volumes of candidates efficiently. The centralized dashboard makes it easier to track progress across roles. Users say the system scales well, but some note that customizing workflows can take time and may require support.

Candidate interview

55% Positive

37% Neutral

9% Negative

Greenhouse helps hiring teams stay aligned during interviews by offering shared access to candidate profiles, feedback forms, and scorecards. This structure supports consistent evaluations and reduces bias. Users say the ability to leave notes and track interview stages improves coordination. However, some mention that switching between candidate views and feedback forms can be slightly cumbersome during high-volume hiring.

Least Positive Sentiments

Resume management

49% Positive

32% Neutral

18% Negative

Teams use Greenhouse to store and retrieve resumes, search by keyword, and import documents from external sources. The system makes it easy to access recent resumes, but users report that older documents can be harder to locate. Navigating between dashboards and resume views sometimes requires extra clicks, which slows down workflows for recruiters handling multiple roles.

Reporting

43% Positive

30% Neutral

27% Negative

Greenhouse offers basic reporting tools that help teams share hiring insights with stakeholders. Users appreciate the ability to export data and use templates for common metrics. However, many say the platform lacks advanced customization options, making it difficult to build detailed or dynamic reports. Some teams rely on external tools to analyze data more effectively and fill reporting gaps.

Email communication

30% Positive

44% Neutral

25% Negative

Greenhouse supports email templates and scheduling tools that help teams stay in touch with candidates throughout the hiring process. Users value the ability to automate outreach, but note that incoming emails aren’t tracked and responses can be missed. Some report issues with messages landing in spam folders, and mention that support is only available via email, which can slow down resolution times.

## Greenhouse User Reviews

## Greenhouse customer ratings

- Overall rating: 4.5/5
- Total reviews: 765

### Rating distribution

- 5 stars: 450 reviews (59%)
- 4 stars: 260 reviews (34%)
- 3 stars: 46 reviews (6%)
- 2 stars: 3 reviews (0%)
- 1 star: 6 reviews (1%)

### Secondary ratings

- Ease of use: 4.4/5
- Value for money: 4.2/5
- Customer support: 4.4/5
- Functionality: 4.3/5

---

### A solid ATS, but the experience depends heavily on setup and permissions

- Overall rating: 3/5
- Reviewer: Flavia C.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Staffing and Recruiting
- Company size: 51-200 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 2 years
- Reviewed: August 2026
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

I used Greenhouse for over a year and found it to be a good, reliable ATS for managing candidates and supporting a structured hiring process. Its integrations, automation, dashboards, and communication tools were a significant improvement over the simpler systems I had previously used. At the same time, my experience may not represent everything Greenhouse can offer because the platform did not appear to be fully configured for advanced recruiting workflows at my company. Access restrictions also meant that recruiters could not use many features without administrator or manager permissions. Overall, it handled the core ATS functions well, but my experience with it was less flexible and advanced than with some newer platforms.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 3/5
- Customer support: 3/5
- Functionality: 3/5

#### Pros

Greenhouse was the first ATS I used with meaningful automation and integrations, after previously working with much simpler systems. Its LinkedIn and email integrations made candidate management and communication easier, while its dashboards provided useful visibility into recruitment activity and the hiring process. Overall, it offered a more structured and efficient recruiting workflow than the basic ATS platforms I had used before.

#### Cons

Greenhouse does not offer native candidate outreach sequences, which limits its usefulness for sourcing and managing follow-up campaigns. Recruiters may need to use a separate tool for automated, multi-step outreach. My access as a recruiter was also quite limited because many features were only available to administrators or managers. This sometimes made it difficult to manage processes independently or take full advantage of the platform.

---

### Strong ATS for scaling recruiting teams, major upgrade from legacy systems

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Jolene B.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Health, Wellness and Fitness
- Company size: 501-1000 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 2 years
- Reviewed: April 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by the software vendor to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Our experience with Greenhouse has been very positive. We implemented it to replace a limited ATS that lacked scheduling, automation, and reliable reporting. Since switching, we have significantly improved hiring efficiency, candidate experience, and internal alignment with hiring managers. It has allowed us to scale recruiting across multiple markets while maintaining consistency in how we evaluate candidates. Structured interviews, automation, and better pipeline visibility have been the biggest drivers of impact. It is not a plug-and-play solution. You need clear processes, training, and ownership to get the most out of it. But if implemented correctly, it becomes a powerful system that supports both high-volume hiring and more strategic roles.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

Greenhouse has been a major operational upgrade for our recruiting team. The biggest wins are structured interviewing, scheduling, and overall pipeline visibility. The scorecard system allows us to standardize hiring across markets and reduce bias, which was a major gap in our previous ATS. Automated reminders for interview feedback have improved hiring manager accountability and speed. Scheduling is seamless compared to legacy systems. Candidates can self-schedule, which cuts down on back-and-forth and improves time to fill. The CRM functionality is also a strong addition. We can proactively build pipelines, nurture candidates, and run targeted outreach campaigns instead of relying solely on inbound applicants. Reporting and integrations are another highlight. Being able to connect Greenhouse to tools like Google Sheets and pull real-time data has made it much easier to track hiring metrics and communicate with leadership. Overall, it brings structure, visibility, and scalability to the recruiting process.

#### Cons

There is a learning curve, especially for hiring managers who are not used to structured interviews or consistent scorecard usage. Adoption requires training and reinforcement. Customization can sometimes feel rigid. While structure is a strength, certain workflows or reporting views require workarounds. The reporting is powerful, but not always intuitive out of the box. You need to spend time building dashboards or exporting data to get exactly what you want. Cost can also be a consideration, particularly for smaller teams, though it is justified if you are hiring at scale.

#### Reasons for switching to Greenhouse

We outgrew Paychex Flex from a recruiting standpoint. It lacked core ATS functionality like interview scheduling, structured scorecards, and reliable reporting, which created inefficiencies and limited visibility into our hiring process. Greenhouse offered a more robust, scalable solution with automation, better pipeline management, and tools to standardize interviews and improve decision-making. The switch was driven by the need for a system that could support high-volume hiring while also improving candidate experience and internal accountability.

---

### Reliable platform

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Rachel L.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Consumer Services
- Company size: 501-1000 employees
- Product usage: Used monthly for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: March 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Super easy to use, nothing really complicated that I've come across, really useful for hiring for new positions

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

it's really easy to find great new candidates for new positions and streamlines the process to make hiring easier

#### Cons

it's a little flat and could use a more modern look sometimes but it foes get the job down either way

---

### Honest review from Built

- Overall rating: 3/5
- Reviewer: Ashley G.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Financial Services
- Company size: 201-500 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: April 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by the software vendor to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Greenhouse is the best structured hiring system of record on the market, but it currently feels more like a static database than a proactive system of action. For a team like ours at Built, currently moving to a 65% strategic/35% reactive split, we find ourselves having to build external AI orchestration or buy third-party tools to handle what should be native: high-volume fraud prevention, complex auto-scheduling, and bulk workflow efficiency. It provides the essential data foundation, but the manual 'tax' required to operate it daily is becoming a bottleneck for a modern, lean People team.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 3/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 2/5
- Functionality: 3/5

#### Pros

-Structured Hiring Foundation: It provides a framework for objective, signal-based interviewing that aligns with our high-performance culture. -Robust API Ecosystem: The ability to pull data via the BI Connector and Harvest API is critical for our shift toward an AI-native "Intelligence Layer". -Source of Truth: It serves as a reliable system of record -Customization: The ability to build specific role scorecards ensures we maintain a high bar for talent even as we scale.

#### Cons

-Fraud & Spam Vulnerability: The 97%+ fraud rate in Engineering applications is a massive operational tax. I am disappointed that solving a baseline security and quality issue requires a significant financial upgrade to "Real Talent". -Automation Gaps: Native scheduling still lacks the complexity needed for an AI-native function, currently consuming 1,000–1,700 hours of team capacity annually. -Bulk Action Friction: The inability to easily mass-reject candidates after applying specific filters (required skills, etc.) creates unnecessary manual work. -UI Inefficiencies: Small but frequent friction points, such as only saving the last 5 pasted URLs, add up to significant time waste when trying to personalize scheduling confirmations with Hiring Manager LinkedIn profiles. -We don't have a talent coordinator or anyone in recruiting ops, meaning our recruiters have to do all the manual setup. Greenhouse is extremely "click-heavy." It takes a lot of manual effort to set up a job properly, or to do something as simple as pulling up a job description, and its internal reporting often requires exporting data to Excel to get real insights.

#### Reasons for switching to Greenhouse

we were looking for better reporting and analytics

---

### Continuing to innovate and improve

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Rosa S.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Farming
- Company size: 201-500 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: April 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by the software vendor to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Really positive and great to see the improvement in account management. Given the amount we spend on this tool, this was definitely lagging until this year.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Customer support: 3/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

The tool is easy to use and has great functionality to create custom fields and filter from these. The bulk actions are excellent. Just waiting on bulk hire.

#### Cons

The activity could be better displayed to keep accurate reports of communication. The comments section is fine but you can easily loose the communication. It would be better to display this in a more succent way.

#### Reasons for choosing Greenhouse

We needed the bulk functionality that Greenhouse offered at the time over Smartrecruiter.

#### Reasons for switching to Greenhouse

It was ReadyTech - It was a poor ATS in comparison and we needed a tool that could life our process.

---

### Solid ATS for structured hiring, but scorecard adoption is a challenge

- Overall rating: 4/5
- Reviewer: Luis B.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Information Technology and Services
- Company size: 501-1000 employees
- Product usage: Used weekly for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: April 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by the software vendor to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

It does what a modern ATS should do. The gap is adoption — the tool is only as good as the discipline of the team filling it in, and it doesn't do enough to reduce friction for occasional users.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 3/5
- Customer support: 2/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

Greenhouse keeps the hiring pipeline visible across recruiters, hiring managers, and leadership. The structured interview kits make it easy to standardize feedback, and the integrations with our existing tools fit into the workflow without much friction. When everyone uses it consistently, it's one of the better tools for keeping searches organized.

#### Cons

Scorecard submissions are too easy to skip for people who aren't in the tool daily. Feedback ends up scattered in other channels instead of centralized in Greenhouse. Better nudges after interviews, especially mobile-friendly ones, would go a long way toward driving adoption.

#### Reasons for switching to Greenhouse

Better UI/UX, also better analytics and ease of use

---

### The best ATS in the market!

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Marie-Pier C.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Retail
- Company size: 1001-5000 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: April 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by the software vendor to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

I love it — definitely one of the best tools I’ve used. It’s intuitive, well-organized, and makes the whole process much more efficient.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

I really appreciate the level of automation that’s been put in place — it makes a big difference. Everything feels well thought-out and organized, which helps create a much smoother and more efficient process overall. It’s clear there was intention behind how this was built, and it shows in how easy it is to follow and use.

#### Cons

There does seem to be a lack of configuration options when it comes to the overall look and feel. While the structure and automation are strong, the customization side feels somewhat limited, especially if the goal is to adapt the experience so it better reflects different preferences, branding, or visual needs.

#### Reasons for choosing Greenhouse

The bilingual aspect of cuztomisation offered to us.

#### Reasons for switching to Greenhouse

Not the right fit for our needs and usage.

---

### You need this for all hiring needs

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Hannah D.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Marketing and Advertising
- Company size: 51-200 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for less than 2 years
- Reviewed: November 2025
- Review source details: This review was submitted organically. No incentive was offered

I am a daily user of GH and use it to hire and source all of our candidates and now employees. I have used LinkedIn recruiting before and it blows LI out of the water. This makes hiring and keeping track of all stages, responses and resumes in one place. You also have the ability to tag other hiring managers and ask for their opinions instead of having to email them separately. Everything is in one plane.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

super easy to use, has a step and stage for everything you could think of. easily categorizes, rejects, moves stages, and keeps track of all candidate information.

#### Cons

I like everything about Greenhouse. I will not be using any other applicant tracking system going forward.

#### Reasons for switching to Greenhouse

Bullhorn was not user friendly and made switching stages more complicated than it needed to be.

---

### Supports growing companies

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Joanna K.
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Security and Investigations
- Company size: 201-500 employees
- Product usage: Used daily for more than 2 years
- Reviewed: April 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by the software vendor to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 5/5
- Customer support: 5/5
- Functionality: 5/5

#### Pros

The built in automations, streamline processes and set up makes recruiting fast easy and manageable. Best thing, it is easy for hiring managers to navigate.

#### Cons

You need to have a few add ons for additional features, such as AI tools, texting and note taking. The App is horrible and almost none functional.

#### Reasons for choosing Greenhouse

Better functionality and more options for setting up.

#### Reasons for switching to Greenhouse

Functionality and price were much better with Greenhouse.

---

### Greenhouse is the way to go!

- Overall rating: 5/5
- Reviewer: Verified Reviewer
- Verified reviewer: Yes
- Industry: Education Management
- Company size: 11-50 employees
- Product usage: Used monthly for less than 2 years
- Reviewed: July 2026
- Review source details: This reviewer was invited by us to submit an honest review and offered a nominal incentive as a thank you.

Greenhouse overall has been a great experience, with ease of use for our hiring team. As someone who applied for a higher position internally and used the Greenhouse hiring system myself I found it so easy to navigate and keep track of my application after applying.

#### Ratings breakdown

- Ease of use: 5/5
- Value for money: 4/5
- Functionality: 4/5

#### Pros

Easy to use interface for both the applicant and the hiring team. The portal is user friendly and clear on how to access. I would consider it an incredibly valuable software.

#### Cons

I can't think of any major cons about Greenhouse, though some applicants have reported their application not showing up on their account after applying for some time.

---

Showing 1 - 10 of 765 Reviews

[See All Reviews](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/reviews/)

## Greenhouse FAQs

-   What is Greenhouse software used for?
    
    Greenhouse is primarily used to organize, manage, and automate the time-intensive recruitment process. It can create job postings, track applications, manage candidates, and generate data and reports on the hiring process. Users say it's easy to use and functional with helpful customer service, and they like the automated reminders and user-friendly, visually appealing design.
    
-   Does Greenhouse use AI?
    
    Yes, Greenhouse uses AI tech for talent filtering, talent rediscovery, resume anonymization, offer forecasts, sourcing automation email with sentiment analysis, and email generation. Some of these features are available in all pricing tiers and others need a specific plan.
    

## Greenhouse Popular Comparisons

[BambooHR vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/bamboohr-profile/vs/greenhouse/)[micro1 vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/compare/3501-greenhouse/vs/529654-micro1/)[100Hires vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/100hires-profile/vs/greenhouse/)[Paylocity vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/web-pay/)[Paycom vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/paycom/)[Rippling vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/rippling/)[ZipRecruiter vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/ziprecruiter/)[RUN Powered by ADP vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/adp-run-profile/vs/greenhouse/)[Paycor vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/paycor-perform/)[Zoho Recruit vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/zoho-recruit/)[NEOGOV vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/neogov/)[Paychex Flex vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/paychex-flex/)[Indeed for Employers vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/indeed-for-employers/)[CEIPAL ATS vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/ceipal-ats-profile/vs/greenhouse/)[UKG Pro vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/ukg-pro/)[isolved vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/vs/isolved/)[Dayforce HCM vs Greenhouse](https://www.softwareadvice.com/compare/3501-greenhouse/vs/4592-Dayforce-HCM/)

[Compare All Alternatives](https://www.softwareadvice.com/hr/greenhouse-profile/alternatives/)

Stuck Between Options?

Our experts can help you compare Greenhouse with other top options, so you can find the best fit for your needs.

## See what companies are saying about Software Advice