Galileo vs Action1: Which is best for you?

Very smart, customer-focused engineering teams make deploying and supporting Galileo low risk and cost effective

We would like to be able to send alerts to distribution lists defined and controlled at our site so that the Galileo configuration does not have to change (e.g. the on-call paging), but with the monitoring hosted at AWS, email alerts take so many hops in AWS to our site and back out to MS365 ( hosted elsewhere) and through those mail hosts, that email alerts are rejected by cloud mail servers (over which we have no control) because they have been forwarded too many times ; we cannot leverage our on-site DLs and have to manually update the addresses in the Galileo GUI, which is tedious

Really simplifed our patching needs as well as offering live vulnerability data in an easy to digest format, it has helped us to gain visibility across our organisations and provide our technicians with additional tools to support their roles.

The fact that you cant automate OS version upgrades (Tried for Win11 25H2) and if you run it manually it is very buggy.