ACCELQ vs QA Wolf: Which is best for you?

We needed both frontend and backend testing, and all the scheduled tests needed to run locally on our own servers due to safety concerns for customer data, and AccelQ could give us that. Whenever I've run into problems or needed assistance on how to solve a task, I've always gotten quick help from support to find a solution.

Load times with dashboards are sometimes slow when executing very large regression suites, although it has no impact on reliability in general.

They are very autonomous and are able to develop rigorous test coverage with little guidance, and thoroughly vet bugs before forwarding them to us. While working with them, we've had excellent engagement...none of the delayed back and forth that sometimes characterizes engagements with other firms, nor a flood of valid but low-impact bugs to provide their value.

It's notoriously difficult to setup test in a blockchain environment where each change to the distributed ledger is immutable, and can be very cumbersome to create & maintain those tests.