Iru vs Galileo: Which is best for you?

The automated device enrolment and blueprints handle device configuration from start to finish, eliminating manual setup tasks and saving our team countless hours.

Kandji comes with a lot of native available 3rd party application, and managing those can be very easy, but in a scalable environment it can get messy with their new assignment maps which give a good overview but as those are still missing a clear naming and structure capabilities this can cause issues

Very smart, customer-focused engineering teams make deploying and supporting Galileo low risk and cost effective

We would like to be able to send alerts to distribution lists defined and controlled at our site so that the Galileo configuration does not have to change (e.g. the on-call paging), but with the monitoring hosted at AWS, email alerts take so many hops in AWS to our site and back out to MS365 ( hosted elsewhere) and through those mail hosts, that email alerts are rejected by cloud mail servers (over which we have no control) because they have been forwarded too many times ; we cannot leverage our on-site DLs and have to manually update the addresses in the Galileo GUI, which is tedious