Software Advice lists all providers across its website—not just those that pay us—so that users can make informed purchase decisions. Users can talk to our advisors for free to receive software recommendations matching their needs. Software providers pay us for sponsored profiles to reach users interested in their products.
Software Advice carefully verified over 2 million reviews to bring you authentic software experiences from real users. Our human moderators verify that reviewers are real people and that reviews are authentic. They use leading tech to analyze text quality and to detect plagiarism and generative AI.
Researchers at Software Advice use a mix of verified reviews, independent research, and objective methodologies to bring you selection and ranking information you can trust. While we may earn a referral fee when you visit a provider through our links or talk to an advisor, this has no influence on our research or methodology.
CRIO vs RealTime-CTMS: 2026 Comparison
per month
per month
and Demo
Features
- We had been looking for a system that is very easy to use, had multiple features that cater to clinical research (scheduling, payment tracking, eSource, archiving etc) for a very long time but none of the existing systems could provide a complete package.......until I came across CRIO.
- The software has not lived up to the expectation, and their growing price point has made it a thorn in the side of their long-time customers.
- It would be such a time saver and minimize the risk of errors during data entry.
- It is not very easy to post a check that is paid with many line items and payment amounts that need to be adjusted to match the sponsor payment. When emailing invoice to sponsor, there is no mechanism to ensure email was received such as a reach receipt by Sponsor.
in the comparison
in the comparison
in the comparison
in the comparison
Recommendations