ACCELQ vs BrowserStack: Which is best for you?

We needed both frontend and backend testing, and all the scheduled tests needed to run locally on our own servers due to safety concerns for customer data, and AccelQ could give us that. Whenever I've run into problems or needed assistance on how to solve a task, I've always gotten quick help from support to find a solution.

Load times with dashboards are sometimes slow when executing very large regression suites, although it has no impact on reliability in general.

It provides wide browser/device coverage, reliable performance, and easy integration with CI/CD pipelines, making cross-browser testing highly efficient.

Pricing can be on the higher side for small teams or startups, and there are occasional performance lags or session disconnects, especially during peak usage hours or on slower internet connections, which can interrupt testing flow.