Jira vs. Wrike: 2026 Comparison

Generally, reviewer feedback on the task management features offered by Jira and Wrike are very positive, with both seen as offering detailed and visual solutions to this task. However, where they contrast slightly is in Jira’s greater focus on Agile and software development project management methodologies. Wrike, on the other hand, tends to prove a more versatile solution for users in other sectors.

This makes sense as our data shows Jira users are more likely to work in IT or software development. This is further exemplified by the fact that users point out Jira’s task management effectiveness with tasks such as bug tracking. While many in these fields also use Wrike, it also has a significant proportion of users in industries such as marketing and advertising.

Another factor users frequently mention is the customizability of workflows. Both products offer the ability for firms to adjust and control this. However, Wrike seems to be the easier of the two in this regard; Jira, by comparison, is seen as more complex and harder to take full advantage of without familiarity.

Task management for Jira: From the 677 reviews we received from Jira users on task management, 98% rated this feature as important or highly important. Our analysis shows that Jira is best suited to users looking to manage IT or software development workflows, using Agile methodologies.

Task management for Wrike: Of the 118 reviewers who provided accounts of their use of task management, 98% rated this feature as important or highly important. Our research suggests that Wrike is a better choice for users seeking more straightforward ease of use.

In terms of their project planning and scheduling, both tools offer users a range of useful tools for breaking down bigger assignments into more manageable and detailed tasks.

Flexible features such as detailed roadmaps, customizable boards, and sprint planning help Jira users achieve this. Reviewers especially value these elements, as they allow them to reorganize projects into individualized components, set timelines, and allocate resources. However, some highlight challenges when applying traditional project management approaches, such as using Gantt charts. 

On the other hand, Wrike offers more options in this regard for those using project management styles other than Agile. Its project planning and scheduling features allow users to create detailed timelines and set dependencies effectively, with feedback particularly praising the platform’s capacity to improve company productivity and collaboration. Yet, there is also user criticism centering around difficulty using the navigation and sorting tasks by specific criteria.

Project planning/scheduling in Jira:

Of the 340 reviewers who detailed their use of project planning/scheduling, 97% rated this feature as important or highly important. Our analysis shows that Jira works better for firms seeking a deeper level of customization of their workflows.

Project planning/scheduling in Wrike:

Of the 85 reviewers who gave detailed accounts of their use of project planning/scheduling, 94% rated this feature as important or highly important. Wrike’s visual approach to user interface and relative ease of use make it well-suited for companies with fewer technical resources at their disposal.

Task progress tracking tools in Jira and Wrike allow users to maintain visibility over ongoing projects as they evolve. While user feedback praises both options, Jira tends to have the edge in this regard.

When analyzing Jira user feedback, it is clear that they find its time-tracking features essential. They particularly appreciate the capacity to monitor progress with Kanban and Scrum boards, burndown charts, and customizable dashboards. Another element that can make Jira an intuitive choice in this sense is its capacity to enhance this process with other integrations, such as Clockify. 

Wrike, by comparison, isn’t as flexible with add-ons for progress tracking, relying mainly instead on its own in-built features for managing this process. Nevertheless, these are well-received by users who regard them as suitably intuitive, providing real-time monitoring capacity. While users appreciate elements such as custom workflows and visual tools provided within this feature, they also highlight a lack of automation in status updates and better options for sorting tasks and projects when tracking progress. 

Task progress tracking in Jira:

Among the 342 reviewers who gave detailed accounts of their use of task progress tracking, 97% rated this feature as important or highly important. Based on our analysis, Jira is a better option for users who want a more personalized task progress-tracking experience through integrations or automations.

Task progress tracking in Wrike:

Of the 59 reviewers who gave detailed accounts of their use of task progress tracking, 93% rated this feature as important or highly important. According to our analysis, Wrike is the better option for users looking for an intuitive, built-in progress tracking experience.