Amazing Charts EHR OB/GYN 2026: Benefits, Features & Pricing

Valdosta Women’s Health Center, PC is a busy two-physician practice that was established in 1993. Management decided to implement an EMR in 2005 and a full time Microsoft Certified technician was hired to research and launch the EMR. A server-based EMR was purchased and installed, and chaos resulted. The EMR (Not digiChart) was immature and template-driven, and it had issues revery day that required contacting the vendor for support. The so-called technical support involved submitting a trouble ticket email that took up to 14 days allowed to correct. It took 24 clicks of the mouse for the physicians to sign off on a normal pap smear. Updates were offered at more cost. Our IT guy quit in despair. Management decided to abandon the old EMR and migrate to digiChart in 2007. The migration was painless and quick. We have never looked back. digiChart was designed by OB-GYNs for OB-GYNs, not by computer geeks. It is intuitive. Support personnel are friendly and quick to respond via a telephone call or email. User meetings attended were very helpful. The physicians love digiChart, and two other local OB-GYNs also moved their EMR to digiChart after seeing digiChart in action at the hospital. The antepartum record is instantly recognized nationwide, and several physicians have called our office to ask which EMR we use to produce the ACOG formatted antepartum record. digiChart is not perfect; nothing is. digiChart has grown and experienced growing pains. One episode involved slowness of operation that was challenging, but it's now corrected. You get what you expect, and the providers at VWHC expect digiChart to run smooth and quick - and digiChart meets or exceeds expectations nearly every time.

Upgrades are tough. But, it appears as though digiChart is following the MU lead, which is a challenge in and of itself

ACOG flowsheet built in, patient information flows easily from one visit to the next, drag and drop MDM is helpful, good task bar.

Doesn't keep up with current operating systems. We are two generations behind Windows 10 (using Windows 7 Pro) so for providers who like to use tablets, it is difficult to view the patient information. Also, the patient portal is very poor and needs work.

Easy to learn and less expensive that some of the other EMRS. Less input required to finish chart so can work through patients faster

Frequent crashes; frequently slow to respond, especially mid-afternoon; frequent compatibility issues with updates. Less input means less information available when you recall chart.

This is an OB/GYN specific program that uses ACOG forms as well. This makes the program one of a kind. The medical records are seamless and ease to follow.

There’s a learning curve, but that’s with any EHR. The support team is always helpful in assisting when necessary.

Geared toward ob/Gyn, has all the necessary components for proper documentation. Up to date for ICD-10.

Frequently freezes/kicks user out. Often has prepopulated answers that neither pt or MD has entered and cannot be removed. Often we enter data in one section and it’s all erased when you move on to the next section. Always runs slow. Bad user interface on patient portal. Time stamps are not in local time, makes documentation problematic.

I am familiar with it.

terrible customer support. slow. i spend half my day watching the little circle spin around and around. kicks me off at least once a day "smart applications has stopped working"........sometimes before it has even STARTED working.

Picture of patient on encounter, and specific OB-GYN focus of the program. Web-based interface accessible at home/work.

Too slow. Patient interface has many problems. Difficulty changing things when complaints are given. Difficulty complying with government regulations as required by law.

Looks good at first but then is awful. No upgrades over years. We have awesome data and it is as slow as Christmas.

Have had for over seven years and has progressively worsened. Changing to eCW but Digi would not give us a format of our electronic information that we could translate to a new system. They have us over a barrel. Run!

The physicians like the OB flow chart and the ease in seeing everything in one spot. The clinical reminders are also a favorite

Latency issues hamper efficiency, the patient portal is not functional and information disappears after it is entered into the portal. We have many complaints about the patient portal.

OB flowsheet is almost workable. I am struggling to think about the things I can complement in this overall abomination of an EHR

Crashes multiple times per day. Support is poor at best. Functionality and UX is horrible. Search engine may be the worst I have seen.