Over the last 8 years we've helped 180,300 companies choose the right
software by sharing our extensive research on over 1,239 software systems.
Save time & costly mistakes. Our experts will recommend the best software for your needs. Call for a free consultation: (888) 234-5103
Medical billing software automates repetitive and error-prone billing tasks. It helps medical offices increase collections, code claims properly, verify patients’ insurance coverage, post payments and EOBs, provide reports on collections and rejections and more.
There are hundreds of computerized medical billing systems on the market and they range from functionally simple to very sophisticated. The most basic systems help providers generate paper statements based on demographics and billing codes input by the user. Additionally, medical office billing software allows providers to submit claims electronically, scrub claims, post payments, pull advanced reports and more.
In this guide we discuss the following:
Billing and other administrative tasks are notoriously paper-laden and cumbersome. A modern medical billing software system allows billers to be as efficient as possible at coding, submitting and following up on claims.
Moreover, staff will find that medical billing and coding software helps them code claims accurately to avoid errors. As a result, most providers find their collection rates increase when going from manually submitting claims to using medical claim software.
Finally, advanced reporting tools typically provide insights that are tough to gain without a medical billing solution. By knowing which claims get rejected most often, which payers pay the slowest, and which visits can be upcoded, providers can make data-driven decisions to improve collections.
Most practices and billing services we speak with face a common set of billing challenges, and consequently, they’re considering purchasing (or replacing) software to address those challenges. Here are common scenarios we often hear about during our phone consultations:
Transitioning from Paper Claims. Typically, solo or small practices are making the move from paper claims to an electronic system (though that is not always the case). They have a difficult time keeping track of patients and who owes what. They will implement medical billing software for the first time to reduce paperwork, track all data in a central place, and improve efficiency overall.
Bringing Billing In House. Another common scenario, most practices choose to bring billing in house--as opposed to outsourcing to a third-party service--to cut costs, have more control of their billing and accounts receivable, and get everything centrally located.
Replacing Antiquated Software. Finally, offices replacing their existing system do so because it’s outdated and expensive to maintain, it doesn’t meet their technical requirements (e.g., integration with electronic medical record software), or they have a difficult time using it. In this scenario, Web-based medical billing software is an attractive option because it’s modern and easy to use, costs less up front, and updates automatically as vendors release new versions and enhancements.
Most practices we speak with match one of these common buyer types:
Medical billing software prices often depend on the application’s deployment model. On-premise systems will require upfront costs for licenses, servers and other necessary hardware, setup and training. Buyers of on-premise systems will also need to pay ongoing maintenance and support fees, which are typically 15-20 percent of the upfront licensing costs.
Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications typically require lower upfront costs and ongoing monthly fees that cover licensing, support and upgrades. Finally, there are free medical billing software options that are supported by alternative revenue streams, such as advertising.
Most buyers who have successfully implemented systems will be able to generate returns on their investments through improved accuracy of filings, improved billing efficiency, and subsequently, increased collections.
Support for ICD-10
By law, every health care provider and payer--or at least those that are subject to requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)--must use ICD-10 billing codes by October 1, 2014. This is a very large undertaking as there are 155,000 classifications of diagnoses, tests and procedures under ICD-10--that’s a big upgrade from the 17,000 ICD-9 codes. Providers and billing staff should make sure their software vendor supports the latest set of codes. For more information, visit the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website.
Integrated Suites vs. Stand-Alone Billing Solutions
Buyers will need to decide if they want to implement a standalone system, a system integrated with patient scheduling (typically called “practice management”), or a fully-integrated billing, scheduling, and electronic medical records (EMR) system. Many vendors such as AdvancedMD and NueMD offer all three options. Medical billing solutions have long been the only or primary applications used in many doctors’ offices, and they are usually the first systems new practices will implement. Despite government legislation requiring the adoption of EMRs, we still hear from many practices looking for standalone billing or practice management systems.
On-Premise vs. Web-Based
SaaS or Web-based medical billing systems have become very popular and comprise well over 50 percent of new solution sales. Low upfront costs, greater accessibility, and little to no IT requirements are contributing factors to so many buyers preferring Web-based systems. Assuming buyers have reliable Internet access, we typically recommend they consider these programs.
A primary concern we hear from buyers regards data security. Since medical billing involves the storage and transmission of so much sensitive patient data, buyers will want to make sure they implement a secure system. Vendors are well aware of this need and offer HIPAA-compliant systems.
Usability tends to be more a function of the end user and how the system is configured than the medical claims software itself. Users with medical experience can typically adopt most systems quickly. Many complaints regarding usability tend to be related to setup and maintenance of servers and other hardware, not the applications themselves.